CRRT Versus Plasmapheresis in Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning
AlP
Comparison Between the Effect of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Versus Plasmapheresis on Mortality Rate in Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning; Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
75
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aluminum phosphide (AlP) is a solid fumigant pesticide sold as tablets in use since the 1940s. It is considered to be an ideal pesticide because of its cheapness, efficiency, and easy availability in the market and is widely used as a grain preservative worldwide.The mortality in cases of aluminum phosphide poisoning varies between 60% and 90%, even in experienced and well-equipped hospitals. Patients mostly die due to cardiovascular collapse, refractory shock, severe acidemia, fulminant hepatic failure, and or adult respiratory distress syndrome. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a slow and smooth continuous extracorporeal blood purification, which is designed to replicate depurative function of the kidney. It is usually implemented over 24 h to several days with an aim of gentle correction of fluid overload and removal of excess uremic toxins. Furthermore, many observational studies considered CRRT as the predominant form of RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU) for critically ill patients with AKI and/or multiorgan failure, along with acute brain injury or other causes of increased intracranial pressure or generalized brain edema. The effectiveness of CRRT is mainly due to its accurate volume control, steady acid-base and electrolyte correction, and achievement of hemodynamic stability in adults and pediatrics. Plasmapheresis (PPH) can rapidly and effectively remove toxic substances and their potentially toxic metabolites from the blood compartment, especially those with high protein-binding. As the potential benefit of therapeutic plasma exchange is increasingly recognized, its use is becoming more widespread, and case reports have confirmed its value in the treatment of drug overdose. The application of plasmapheresis dramatically reversed the severe biochemical and clinical manifestations and was able to prevent serious co-occurrence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2025
CompletedApril 19, 2022
April 1, 2022
3 years
April 11, 2022
April 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality rate
Evaluation of the effect of CRRT versus PPH on mortality rate in acute AlP poisoning, (30 days mortality).
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
ICU
30 days
Morbidity
30 days
Sessions
30 days
Vasopressors
30 days
Study Arms (3)
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients will receive routine management only.
CRRT group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive CRRT and routine management.
PPH group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive plasmapheresis and routine management.
Interventions
Prisma-flex (Gambro-Swedan) machine will be used to carry out both CRRT and PPH sessions. Each CRRT session continue for 72 hours, while PPH session continue for 4 hours.
Prisma-flex (Gambro-Swedan) machine will be used to carry out both CRRT and PPH sessions. Each CRRT session continue for 72 hours, while PPH session continue for 4 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients exposed to AlP poisoning of either sex.
- Critically ill with severe symptomatic acute AlP poisoning; SBP\<90mmHg, PH\<7.32 and HR\<60 bpm.
- Age \>18 year.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to consent participating research.
- Age \<18 years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Chan LT, Crowley RJ, Delliou D, Geyer R. Phosphine analysis in post mortem specimens following ingestion of aluminium phosphide. J Anal Toxicol. 1983 Jul-Aug;7(4):165-7. doi: 10.1093/jat/7.4.165.
PMID: 6314042BACKGROUNDYan H, Chen H, Li Z, Shen M, Zhuo X, Wu H, Xiang P. Phosphine Analysis in Postmortem Specimens Following Inhalation of Phosphine: Fatal Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning in Children. J Anal Toxicol. 2018 Jun 1;42(5):330-336. doi: 10.1093/jat/bky005.
PMID: 29378027BACKGROUNDNavabi SM, Navabi J, Aghaei A, Shaahmadi Z, Heydari R. Mortality from aluminum phosphide poisoning in Kermanshah Province, Iran: characteristics and predictive factors. Epidemiol Health. 2018 May 27;40:e2018022. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2018022. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29807406BACKGROUNDBellomo R, Ronco C. Nomenclature for continuous renal replacement therapies. Critical Care Nephrology: Springer; 1998. p. 1169-76.
BACKGROUNDRonco C, Ricci Z. Renal replacement therapies: physiological review. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Dec;34(12):2139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1258-6. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
PMID: 18791697BACKGROUNDMacedo E, Mehta RL. Continuous Dialysis Therapies: Core Curriculum 2016. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Oct;68(4):645-657. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.427. Epub 2016 May 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 27241853BACKGROUNDSchutt RC, Ronco C, Rosner MH. The role of therapeutic plasma exchange in poisonings and intoxications. Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):201-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.01033.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22353434BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) The trial will be planned that neither the doctors (investigator) nor the patients will be aware of the group allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2022
First Posted
April 19, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
November 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share