B Cell Tailored Ocrelizumab Versus Standard Ocrelizumab in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
BLOOMS
Efficacy, Safety and Cost-effectiveness of B Cell Tailored Ocrelizumab Versus Standard Ocrelizumab in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
296
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: B-cell depleting therapies like ocrelizumab are very effective in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). As B cell repopulation varies extensively between individuals (ranging from 27-175 weeks), using a treatment scheme with a fixed infusion interval may be suboptimal. So far personalized adapted treatment of ocrelizumab in RRMS has not been studied in a prospective setting. Objective: Evaluating the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of ocrelizumab when administered in personalized B cell tailored intervals in RRMS patients. Study design: This is a national multicenter randomized controlled trial with 96 week follow-up. Study population: The study population consists of 296 adult RRMS patients who have received ocrelizumab treatment for a minimum of 12 months (2x 300 mg infusion and 1x 600mg infusion). Intervention: Patients will be randomized into the standard interval group (600 mg infusions every 24 weeks) or the personalized interval group in which the infusions will be extended as long as the serum CD19 B cell count is below 10 CD19 cells/µL, determined every 4 weeks. Main study parameters: To conclude non-inferiority of personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab there will be two co-primary endpoints: 1. the difference of percentage of confirmed relapse-free patients between the two groups after 96 weeks and 2. the difference of percentage of patients free from new/enlarging T2 lesions on MRI between the two groups after 96 weeks. Secondary study parameters are number of confirmed relapses, annualized relapse rate, number of new T2 lesions and brain atrophy on MRI, disability progression, no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), MS disease biomarkers (serum neurofilament light), quality of life, burden of treatment, immunoglobulin levels and (serious) adverse events including occurrence of infections and COVID-19. Furthermore, various immune cell subsets will be studied in relation to ocrelizumab concentration in a subgroup. Nature and extent of the burden and risks: All patients will be subjected to visits every 24 weeks including clinical scoring and questionnaires. Blood samples and MRI scans will be taken and performed every 48 weeks. Continuous assessment of key stroke dynamics on the patients smartphone and monthly digital cognitive test and walk test will be performed in most patients. As CD19 B cells are kept near complete depletion, the estimated risk of recurrence of disease activity is very low.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Apr 2022
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedApril 28, 2022
April 1, 2022
2 years
February 18, 2022
April 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Confirmed relapse-free patients
Difference of percentage of confirmed relapse-free patients between the two treatment groups after 96 weeks follow-up.
96 weeks
Change of T2 lesions on brain MR
Difference of percentage of patients without new/enlarging T2 MRI lesions between the two treatment groups after 96 weeks follow-up.
96 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Annualized relapse rate
Baseline, year 1, year 2
Total number of active (new and/or enlarging) T2 lesions on brain MRI
Baseline, year 1, year 2
Disability progression during follow-up
Baseline, 6 months,12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Disability progression during follow-up
Baseline, year 1, year 2
Brain atrophy
Baseline, year 1, year 2
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Trough ocrelizumab concentration
24 weeks, 48 weeks, 72 weeks, 96 weeks
Intra-individual course and stability B-cell counts and subsets from whole blood
24 weeks, 48 weeks, 72 weeks, 96 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Standard interval dosing
NO INTERVENTIONThe standard group will receive ocrelizumab every 24 weeks following the current label.
Personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe personalized group will start with B cell measurements 24 weeks after the last infusion (baseline). The infusion interval will never be shorter than 24 weeks. The personalized group will start the study with a possible extension of the interval. The infusion will be postponed as long as CD19 B cell count stays below 10 cells/µL (determined every 4 weeks). When CD19 B cell count exceeds or is equal to 10 cells/µL, ocrelizumab infusion will be scheduled within two weeks
Interventions
Personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A current diagnosis of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis according to the 2017 McDonald criteria34
- EDSS score of 0 to 6.5
- Treatment with ocrelizumab for a minimum of 48 weeks (two 300 mg infusions and one 600 mg infusion)
You may not qualify if:
- Previous treatment with alemtuzumab, cladribine or stem cell transplantation
- Inability to undergo regular MRI scanning
- Women who are pregnant or expect to become pregnant during the study period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Amsterdam UMC, location VU
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joep Killestein, Prof.
Amsterdam UMC, location VU
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2022
First Posted
March 25, 2022
Study Start
April 20, 2022
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- After medical ethical commitee approved the study protocol.