RCT on Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Acute Complete tearS of the Ulnar Collateral ligAment of the Thumb
MUSCAT
MUlticenter Randomized Controlled Trial on Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Acute Complete tearS of the Ulnar Collateral ligAment of the Thumb: Cost- Effectiveness and Functional Outcomes.
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A complete rupture of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the thumb must heal in order to regain proper function of the thumb. Guidelines recommend surgery for complete UCL ruptures, including Stener lesions. This recommendation is based on expert opinion, anatomic theories and low quality retrospective case series. High quality studies comparing cast immobilization with operative treatment are lacking. Research has shown that in about 9 out of 10 patients, a complete UCL rupture, including Stener Lesions, can also be treated with a cast alone for 6 weeks and no surgery is needed. We hypothesize that cast immobilization is non-inferior regarding functional outcome and carries concomitant lower costs compared with operative treatment for complete UCL ruptures, including Stener Lesions. The project aims to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis comparing operative and nonoperative treatment for complete UCL ruptures, including Stener Lesions. The project will take four years, from preparation to reporting of the results. In the following years, implementation will be achieved in collaboration with the Dutch hand surgery committees (NVvH and NVPC), health insurance companies, and medical experts. Research question Is nonoperative treatment with splint immobilization non-inferior to immediate operative treatment regarding functional outcome and does it lead to lower costs in adult patients with an acute complete UCL rupture, including Stener Lesions?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 17, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2026
ExpectedAugust 21, 2025
September 1, 2024
3.6 years
March 3, 2022
August 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Michigan Hand outcome Questionnaire (MHQ)
The MHQ, expressed as the MHQ at 6 months (from randomization to 6 months after) is the primary endpoint of the study. The MHQ is a validated tool for assessment of functional outcome in patients with pathology of the hand. The MHQ is a questionnaire divided in six subscales; overall hand function, activities of daily living (ADLs), pain, work performance, aesthetics and patient satisfaction with hand function. Each subscale has a formula to calculate a score. The final score is a summation of the six individual item-scores divided by six and goes from 0 (severe disability) to 100 (no disability).
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
at randomization, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization.
EQ-5D-5L
at randomization, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization.
Michigan Hand outcome Questionnaire (MHQ)
at randomization, 2, 3 and 12 months after randomization.
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
at randomization, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization.
Patient satisfaction
at randomization, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization.
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cast immobilization
EXPERIMENTALCast immobilization to immobilize the thumb for 4 weeks. After 2 weeks the thumb will be re-examined to determine if surgery is required. It is expected that at re-evaluation at 2 weeks after starting the cast treatment about 1 in 10 patients will still need surgery.
Surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention is compared to surgery, which is standard treatment for complete ulnar collateral ligament ruptures.
Interventions
A cast to immobilize the MCP, in 10-30 degrees (slight) flexion (neutral position), and the CMC joint, in 30-40 degrees palmar abduction, is applied (IP joint is free).
In general, two surgical techniques are described in literature and used in daily clinical practice: * If the UCL is ruptured in the middle of the ligament, sutures are used to reattach the ligament remnants together. * When no viable UCL ligaments are present, the UCL is reattached directly to the bone using suture anchors.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients 18 years and older
- Dutch or English speaking patients
- Patients with an acute complete UCL rupture, with or without a Stener Lesion, diagnosed using physical examination, performed by the hand surgeon. When providing radically directed force to the proximal phalanx (radial deviation stress) as the thumb metacarpal is stabilized, criteria 1 AND 2 must be present to confirm the diagnosis of a complete UCL rupture:
- no firm endpoint in the MCP joint AND
- at least more than 35 degrees of laxity in the MCP joint (measured with the MCP joint in extension or in 30 degrees of flexion) OR more than 15 degrees difference in laxity compared with the uninjured side.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Diakonessenhuis Utrecht
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3582KE, Netherlands
Related Publications (6)
Pulos N, Shin AY. Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries of the Thumb: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev. 2017 Feb 21;5(2):e3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00051. No abstract available.
PMID: 28248741BACKGROUNDPichora DR, McMurtry RY, Bell MJ. Gamekeepers thumb: a prospective study of functional bracing. J Hand Surg Am. 1989 May;14(3):567-73. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80026-7.
PMID: 2738347BACKGROUNDLandsman JC, Seitz WH Jr, Froimson AI, Leb RB, Bachner EJ. Splint immobilization of gamekeeper's thumb. Orthopedics. 1995 Dec;18(12):1161-5. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19951201-06.
PMID: 8749294BACKGROUNDSamora JB, Harris JD, Griesser MJ, Ruff ME, Awan HM. Outcomes after injury to the thumb ulnar collateral ligament--a systematic review. Clin J Sport Med. 2013 Jul;23(4):247-54. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318289c6ff.
PMID: 23615487BACKGROUNDMikhail M, Wormald JCR, Thurley N, Riley N, Dean BJF. Therapeutic interventions for acute complete ruptures of the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb: a systematic review. F1000Res. 2018 Jun 8;7:714. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15065.1. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30057756BACKGROUNDde Haas L, van Hoorn B, van de Lucht V, Schep N, Dijkgraaf M, van Heijl M; MUSCAT Trial Collaborator group. Study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to assess functional outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a primarily non-operative treatment strategy with cast immobilization versus immediate operative treatment followed by cast immobilization for patients with complete ulnar collateral ligament ruptures, including Stener lesions: MUSCAT study. Trials. 2024 Oct 28;25(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08576-x.
PMID: 39468632DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark van Heijl, MD, PhD
Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Not possible for surgical intervention vs cast immobilization
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2022
First Posted
March 22, 2022
Study Start
February 17, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2026
Last Updated
August 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- When the manuscripts are published
An official Data Management Plan has been developed, in accordance with the official format used in the Netherlands.