Initial Management of MRONJ Stages I and II, a Clinical Trial With Detection of Salivary Biomarkers
Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment for Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ) Stages I and II, a Quasi-experimental Clinical Trial With Discovery of Salivary Biomarkers
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious complication in patients receiving antiresorptive therapies, such as Bisphosphonates and Denosumab. It is defined by the presence of exposed bone or a fistula that probes bone in the jaws for a period greater than 8 weeks in patient with a history of current or past antiresorptive or antiangiogenic treatment, and in the absence of prior radiotherapy or maxillary bone metastases. Depending on the severity of the disease 4 stages are described. On the other hand, although the presence of alterations in the levels of certain biomarkers in saliva has been documented in patients with MRONJ compared to healthy patients, its applicability in clinical practice is still unknown. Until recently, the status quo favored the adoption of a conservative strategy (non-surgical) for the initial management of patients with stage I and II. However, in recent years, this paradigm has been challenged by multiple authors who report better and more predictable outcomes with surgical treatment. Based on the hypothesis that patients with MRONJ stage I and II subjected to initial surgical treatment have better results than those undergoing conservative (non-surgical) treatment, te research group has designed a unicentric, quasi-experimental clinical trial where the clinical and radiological outcome at the third month of 2 groups of patients with stages I and II MRONJ undergoing non-surgical treatment (Group 1 / control) versus initial surgical treatment (Group 2 / intervention) will be compared. Also, the investigators hypothesize that the patients with complete resolution of the disease will also normalize salivary biomarkers levels unlike those with stable or progressive disease, meaning there is a correlation between clinical and biochemical response. Accordingly, the levels of specific salivary biomarkers at baseline and at the third month will be determined and compared with the clinical outcome. After enrollment patients will be instructed and offered both treatment strategies, and assigned to the corresponding group according to their choice. Patients in group 1 (non-surgical) will receive traditional conservative treatment while patients undergoing surgical treatment will receive the same guidelines of conservative treatment plus surgery according to a specific surgical protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2024
CompletedFebruary 16, 2021
February 1, 2021
2.9 years
September 28, 2020
February 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Complete clinical resolution
This is the first of the three possible clinical outcome. The patient has achieved complete mucosal healing meaning there is no signs of bone exposure or fistula, the patient is asymptomatic and thus, can be considered cured.
Third month
Clinically stable disease
Second possible clinical outcome. The patient has not been cured but has neither gotten worse meaning that the area of bone exposure (in square centimeters) is equal or not greater than 50 percent of the initial measurement, and has not developed disease up-staging.
Third month
Clinical progression or up-staging
Third possible clinical outcome. The patient has gotten worse meaning that the area of bone exposure (in square centimeters) is greater than 50 percent of the initial measurement, or the patient has progressed to a higher stage.
Third month
Level of salivary NTX
Expressed in nanomoles of bone collagen equivalents
Third Month
Level of salivary MMP-9
Expressed in nanograms/milliliters
Third Month
Levels of IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-36α.
Expressed in picograms/milliliters
Third Month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Radiological absence of radiolucent areas or complete ossification.
Third month
Radiologically stable disease
Third Month
Radiological progression
Third month
Study Arms (2)
Group 1 (non-surgical treatment)
NO INTERVENTION* Soft diet. * Suspension of the use of prostheses or intraoral devices. * Oral hygiene guidelines. * Topical antiseptics: in the form of mouthrinses with 0.12% chlorhexidine after every meal and clorhexidine gel over the exposed bone or fistula. * Systemic antibiotics: for patients in stage 2 in which active acute infection is detected with Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid 875/125 mg every 8 hours for 2 weeks. Those allergic to penicillin will receive clindamycin 300 mg every 8 hours for 2 weeks or Levofloxacin 500 mg / day for 2 weeks. Systemic antibiotic treatment can be prolonged indefinitely until infection and symptoms are controlled.
Group 2 (surgical treatment)
EXPERIMENTALSame guidelines of conservative treatment plus surgical treatment according to the following protocol: Specific protocol for surgical treatment: * Wide mucoperiosteal flaps and complete surgical excision of necrotic bone together with a mucosa margin of at least 2 mm. * Removal of dental pieces included in the diseased area and regularization of bony margins avoiding leaving sharp edges or spicules. * Secure a two layered waterproof closure without tension (simple or with local flaps). * Samples will be sent for Pathological and microbiological analysis. * Stitches removal after two weeks * Postoperative systemic antibiotic following the mentioned protocol until stitches removal.
Interventions
Same guidelines as group 1 (non-surgical) plus surgical treatment according to the following protocol: Specific protocol for surgical treatment * Wide mucoperiosteal flaps and complete surgical excision of necrotic bone together with a mucosa margin of at least 2 mm. * Removal of dental pieces included in the diseased area and regularization of bony margins avoiding leaving sharp edges or spicules. * Secure a two layered waterproof closure without tension (simple or with local flaps). * Samples will be sent for Pathological and microbiological analysis. * Stitches removal after two weeks * Postoperative systemic antibiotic following the mentioned protocol until stitches removal.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Diagnosis of stage I or stage II medication related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) according to the 2014 AAOMS position paper.
You may not qualify if:
- Coexistence of any medical or social condition that prevents proper adherence to treatment or follow-ups (dependent patients without adequate socio-familiar support, drug addiction, severe psychiatric illness, terminal disease with life expectancy less than 3 months).
- Coexistence of Brown's Tumor, Paget's Disease or other bone diseases with the exception of Osteoporosis or bone metastases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07120, Spain
Related Publications (23)
Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, O'Ryan F; American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw--2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1938-56. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.031. Epub 2014 May 5.
PMID: 25234529BACKGROUNDBedogni A, Fusco V, Agrillo A, Campisi G. Learning from experience. Proposal of a refined definition and staging system for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). Oral Dis. 2012 Sep;18(6):621-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2012.01903.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 22353421BACKGROUNDSchiodt M, Reibel J, Oturai P, Kofod T. Comparison of nonexposed and exposed bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws: a retrospective analysis from the Copenhagen cohort and a proposal for an updated classification system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Feb;117(2):204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PMID: 24332520BACKGROUNDKolokythas A, Karras M, Collins E, Flick W, Miloro M, Adami G. Salivary Biomarkers Associated With Bone Deterioration in Patients With Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;73(9):1741-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
PMID: 25889372BACKGROUNDThumbigere-Math V, Michalowicz BS, de Jong EP, Griffin TJ, Basi DL, Hughes PJ, Tsai ML, Swenson KK, Rockwell L, Gopalakrishnan R. Salivary proteomics in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Oral Dis. 2015 Jan;21(1):46-56. doi: 10.1111/odi.12204. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
PMID: 24286378BACKGROUNDBagan J, Sheth CC, Soria JM, Margaix M, Bagan L. Bisphosphonates-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: a preliminary study of salivary interleukins. J Oral Pathol Med. 2013 May;42(5):405-8. doi: 10.1111/jop.12021. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
PMID: 23157469BACKGROUNDBagan J, Saez GT, Tormos MC, Hens E, Terol MJ, Bagan L, Diaz-Fernandez JM, Lluch A, Camps C. Interleukin-6 concentration changes in plasma and saliva in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Oral Dis. 2014 Jul;20(5):446-52. doi: 10.1111/odi.12150. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
PMID: 23837828BACKGROUNDZhang Q, Atsuta I, Liu S, Chen C, Shi S, Shi S, Le AD. IL-17-mediated M1/M2 macrophage alteration contributes to pathogenesis of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jun 15;19(12):3176-88. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0042. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
PMID: 23616636BACKGROUNDKim S, Williams DW, Lee C, Kim T, Arai A, Shi S, Li X, Shin KH, Kang MK, Park NH, Kim RH. IL-36 Induces Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw-Like Lesions in Mice by Inhibiting TGF-beta-Mediated Collagen Expression. J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Feb;32(2):309-318. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2985. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
PMID: 27567012BACKGROUNDBedogni A, Fedele S, Bedogni G, Scoletta M, Favia G, Colella G, Agrillo A, Bettini G, Di Fede O, Oteri G, Fusco V, Gabriele M, Ottolenghi L, Valsecchi S, Porter S, Petruzzi M, Arduino P, D'Amato S, Ungari C, Fung Polly PL, Saia G, Campisi G. Staging of osteonecrosis of the jaw requires computed tomography for accurate definition of the extent of bony disease. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;52(7):603-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 22.
PMID: 24856927BACKGROUNDVan den Wyngaert T, Claeys T, Huizing MT, Vermorken JB, Fossion E. Initial experience with conservative treatment in cancer patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and predictors of outcome. Ann Oncol. 2009 Feb;20(2):331-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn630. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
PMID: 18953067BACKGROUNDLerman MA, Xie W, Treister NS, Richardson PG, Weller EA, Woo SB. Conservative management of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: staging and treatment outcomes. Oral Oncol. 2013 Sep;49(9):977-983. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
PMID: 23830962BACKGROUNDNorholt SE, Hartlev J. Surgical treatment of osteonecrosis of the jaw with the use of platelet-rich fibrin: a prospective study of 15 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;45(10):1256-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 May 11.
PMID: 27179556BACKGROUNDMucke T, Koschinski J, Deppe H, Wagenpfeil S, Pautke C, Mitchell DA, Wolff KD, Holzle F. Outcome of treatment and parameters influencing recurrence in patients with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011 May;137(5):907-13. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0953-1. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
PMID: 20927569BACKGROUNDLesclous P, Grabar S, Abi Najm S, Carrel JP, Lombardi T, Saffar JL, Samson J. Relevance of surgical management of patients affected by bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws. A prospective clinical and radiological study. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):391-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0979-2. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
PMID: 23604698BACKGROUNDRuggiero SL, Kohn N. Disease Stage and Mode of Therapy Are Important Determinants of Treatment Outcomes for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;73(12 Suppl):S94-S100. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.024.
PMID: 26608159BACKGROUNDCarlson ER. Management of antiresorptive osteonecrosis of the jaws with primary surgical resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;72(4):655-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 24480762BACKGROUNDEl-Rabbany M, Sgro A, Lam DK, Shah PS, Azarpazhooh A. Effectiveness of treatments for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Aug;148(8):584-594.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 18.
PMID: 28527518BACKGROUNDHayashida S, Soutome S, Yanamoto S, Fujita S, Hasegawa T, Komori T, Kojima Y, Miyamoto H, Shibuya Y, Ueda N, Kirita T, Nakahara H, Shinohara M, Umeda M. Evaluation of the Treatment Strategies for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ) and the Factors Affecting Treatment Outcome: A Multicenter Retrospective Study with Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Oct;32(10):2022-2029. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3191. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
PMID: 28585700BACKGROUNDMarx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Sep;61(9):1115-7. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00720-1. No abstract available.
PMID: 12966493BACKGROUNDJapanese Allied Committee on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw; Yoneda T, Hagino H, Sugimoto T, Ohta H, Takahashi S, Soen S, Taguchi A, Nagata T, Urade M, Shibahara T, Toyosawa S. Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Position Paper 2017 of the Japanese Allied Committee on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. J Bone Miner Metab. 2017 Jan;35(1):6-19. doi: 10.1007/s00774-016-0810-7. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
PMID: 28035494BACKGROUNDRistow O, Ruckschloss T, Muller M, Berger M, Kargus S, Pautke C, Engel M, Hoffmann J, Freudlsperger C. Is the conservative non-surgical management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw an appropriate treatment option for early stages? A long-term single-center cohort study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;47(3):491-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.12.014. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
PMID: 30642734BACKGROUNDRistow O, Otto S, Troeltzsch M, Hohlweg-Majert B, Pautke C. Treatment perspectives for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;43(2):290-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
PMID: 25541255BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MARTA MONJO CABRER, PHD
Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes Balears
- STUDY DIRECTOR
JOANA RAMIS MOREY, PHD
Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes Balears
- STUDY CHAIR
VICTOR A LASA MENÉNDEZ, MD
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
JUAN M ZÁRATE GONZÁLEZ, MD
Fundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes Balears
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2020
First Posted
October 14, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2020
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
January 15, 2024
Last Updated
February 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- 6 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- IPD sharing subjected to prior authorization of the research group
All IPD that underlie results in a publication