A Cohort Study of Non-surgical Treatment and Exercise Rehabilitation in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial compared the prognosis of surgical and non-surgical treatment in patients with complete anterior cruciate ligament rupture
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2024
CompletedJune 3, 2022
May 1, 2022
2 years
May 31, 2022
May 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000
Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.The role of IKDC2000 is not only to compare the prognosis of the knee joint between the surgical group and the non-surgical group, but also to the normal population we mentioned in the article according to The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form Normative Data Allen F. Anderson,\*† AJSM The IKDC2000 values of different genders and ages were used to judge whether the two groups of patients reached the standard of normal people after surgery.
At 6 months after intervention.
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000
Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.The role of IKDC2000 is not only to compare the prognosis of the knee joint between the surgical group and the non-surgical group, but also to the normal population we mentioned in the article according to The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form Normative Data Allen F. Anderson,\*† AJSM The IKDC2000 values of different genders and ages were used to judge whether the two groups of patients reached the standard of normal people after surgery.
At 12 months after intervention.
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation
Patients will be asked to fill out the IKDC2000 score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.The role of IKDC2000 is not only to compare the prognosis of the knee joint between the surgical group and the non-surgical group, but also to the normal population we mentioned in the article according to The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form Normative Data Allen F. Anderson,\*† AJSM The IKDC2000 values of different genders and ages were used to judge whether the two groups of patients reached the standard of normal people after surgery.
At 24 months after intervention.
Quadriceps strength
Side to side quadriceps strength assessed by Biodex arthrometer test
At 24months after intervention.
Knee laxity (physical exam)
The side to side knee joint laxity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery can be divided into four grades: grade A: -1\~2mm(0+), grade B: 3\~5mm (1+), grade C: 6\~10mm (2+) and D Grade: \>10mm(3+) assessed by Lachman test of physical examination.
At 24months after intervention.
Knee laxity (KT-2000 arthrometer)
The knee laxity test of the forward KT-2000 measured knee laxity at pressures of 132Nt, 88Nt, 66Nt, and 44Nt, respectively, while the back-pushing KT-2000 was measured at -132NT, 88Nt, 66Nt, and -44Nt. The foward-pushing KT-2000 asessed side-to-side can be stratified into five levels are (A) \< - 1 mm, (B) - 1 to 1 mm, (C) 1-3 mm, (D) 3-5 mm and (E) \> 5 mm. The back-pushing KT-2000 is also divided into side to side differences as (A) \< - 2 mm, (B) - 2 to - 0.5 mm, (C) - 0.5 to 0.5 mm, (D) 0.5-1 mm and ( E) \> 1 mm.
At 24months after intervention.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Magnetic resonance imaging was used to compare lateral comparisons of ligament healing and ACL graft healing after conservative treatment, meniscal damage and knee cartilage damage after intervention.
At 24months after intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (36)
Gender
At baseline.
Age
At baseline
BMI
At baseline
Single-Legged Hop Test
At 6 months after intervention.
Single-Legged Hop Test
At 12 months after intervention.
- +31 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
non-surgical treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe patient who was diagnosed with complete rupture of the ACL in the Institute of Sports Medicine of the Third Hospital of Peking University was informed by the doctor that there is a chance that the ACL may grow back after 6 weeks of strict bracing.
surgical treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient who was diagnosed with complete rupture of the ACL in the Institute of Sports Medicine of the Third Hospital of Peking University was informed by the doctor that there is a chance that after 6 weeks of strict brace immobilization, the ACL may grow back without surgery. However, the choice was still made for immediate ACL reconstruction. This group of patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery in the Third Hospital of Peking University.
Interventions
Conservative treatment is required to use a curved splint for 6 weeks to keep the feet on the ground, bathing and sleeping without loosening the utensils and taking no steroids during the period. Physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging were performed after 6 weeks. If laxity remained unsatisfactory, the outcome was recorded as failure and surgery was changed.
The patient underwent knee arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament surgery at the Institute of Sports Medicine of the Third Hospital of Peking University. The surgical methods were all anatomical single-bundle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) Age 8-45 years old 2) Complete rupture of unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) (with/without partial meniscus tear) 3) The history of ACL injury should not be more than 2 months before enrollment 4) Complete rupture of the ACL as determined by clinical examination and MRI 5) Activity level scale 5-9 (Tegner activity score) 6) Degeneration of knee joint \<KL II degree, intraoperative cartilage injury \< ICRS III degree.
- \) The reason for the rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament is sports trauma.
- \) Complete rupture of the ACL meets the MRI indications: (1) The signal changes, deforms, and thickens on imaging, and is completely broken but not separated; (2) There is no sagging and separation of the broken ends; (3) The synovial image is continuous.
- \) The physical examination of complete ACL rupture meets the following indications: (1) Lachman (-) or ADT (-) has one of them; (2) or both are slightly loose, and the slack is not more than 10mm; (3) vertical Leg position ADT (-) or slack \<5mm.
You may not qualify if:
- \) Used in the previous 12 months 1. Intra-articular injection 2. Physical therapy 2) Those who broke again after surgery and underwent knee surgery in other hospitals 3) Previous knee surgery (except diagnostic arthroscopy) 4) Active infection of the knee joint within the past 12 months 5) Informed consent cannot be given 6) History of knee gout 7) Include one or more of the following knee-related injuries: 8) Unstable meniscus tears requiring repair or post-operative changes in rehabilitation Bicompartmental wide meniscectomy Total collateral ligament rupture full thickness cartilage lesions 9) History of rheumatoid arthritis or similar rheumatic diseases 10) The discovery of rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis pigment villonodular synovitis and other joint diseases during the postoperative follow-up period may impair the ability to participate in the study 11) Unable to speak/understand the research content, lack of autonomy, unable to walk, or unable to participate in follow-up 12) Participate in any drug trials during and after the disease 13) Any other medical condition that considers the longest survival time to be less than 2 years 14) Immunodeficiency or HIV positive 15) Illegal drug use or chronic alcoholism or total daily alcohol intake \> 50 g/d 16) Pregnancy/planning pregnancy 17) There are contraindications such as current or previous history of neurological disease, cerebrovascular and serious cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, coronary angiogenesis process or abnormal electrocardiogram Q wave appearance (ECG)), Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic, including transient ischemic attack), peripheral arterial disease diagnosed by angiography 18) No imaging diagnosis 19) History of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or blood system 20) There is a systemic disease that affects physical function, or there is any other condition or treatment that prevents the completion of the trial, including patients with metal devices or movement disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
Related Publications (1)
Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ; International Knee Documentation Committee. The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):128-35. doi: 10.1177/0363546505280214. Epub 2005 Oct 11.
PMID: 16219941RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2022
First Posted
June 3, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Last Updated
June 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share