Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability Of Hydrophilic Versus Conventional Titanium Dental Implants.
Comparative Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability Of Hydrophilic Versus Conventional Titanium Dental Implants - A Randomized Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Dental implants have become more common treatment for replacing missing teeth and aim to improve chewing efficiency, physical health and esthetic. Researchers always tried to improve design, mechanical and chemical properties of implant. Major benefit of surface modification are to improve hydrophilicity, cell to implant adhesion and cell proliferation. These modification improve osseointegration and reduce treatment duration. In this study investigators are evaluating healing capacity of hydrophilic implant compared to conventional implant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 25, 2024
July 1, 2024
1 year
July 12, 2024
July 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Implant Stability Using Resonance Frequency Analysis
Implant stability is measured
"Baseline", "2 weeks", "1 month", "3 months"
Marginal Bone Loss Using RVG and Grid.
Marginal Bone Loss Measured
"3 months"
Soft tissue healing
Soft tissue healing will be assessed using Landry Turnbull and Howley Healing Index. Where soft tissue healing will be scored from 1 to 5, where score "1" indicate worse score and score "5" indicate Best score
"1 Week", "2 weeks", "1 month", "3 months"
Study Arms (2)
Hydrophilic Dental Implant Group
EXPERIMENTALOne dental implant placed will have hydrophilic properties.
Conventional Dental Implant Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis Conventional Dental implant group will act as control.
Interventions
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant. Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant. Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least above 18 years of age.
- Patients who needs replacement of two or more teeth in mandible.
- Adequate bone volume to accommodate planned dental implants.
You may not qualify if:
- General contraindication to dental implant treatment. (Uncontrolled diabetes and severe cardiovascular or infectious diseases).
- Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy.
- Presence of severe, moderate or mild untreated periodontal disease.
- Unwillingness to return for the follow-up examination.
- Smokers.
- Patients who are psychologically unable to participate.
- Poor oral hygiene.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2024
First Posted
July 25, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
August 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual Participant Data will not be shared with other researchers.