Impact of Silicon-based Formulations on Wound Healing of Laser-induced Microscopic Skin Lesions
SPASM11
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Delayed wound healing is considered a health problem with devastating consequences for patients, healthcare systems, and societies. Over the past 20 years, many other groups, as well as ourselves, have evaluated various alternatives to improve wound healing. Despite this, the scientific evidence demonstrating the efficacy of recently developed treatments is often limited. Stratacel® and Stratamed® are two gels approved by Swissmedic and the FDA for use in improving wound healing. To this end, the efficacy of these formulations has been visually tested by a physician or by patients. Using the most advanced medical technologies (confocal microscopy and LCOCT), this study aims to investigate the effect of these formulations on the healing of human skin. For this research, a total of 20 volunteers will be included in this study. Volunteers will have up to 7 follow-up appointments over 21 days. Each appointment will last approximately 30 minutes and will be used to perform external measurements of skin healing. All volunteers will use the same formulations (Stratacel® and Stratamed®) with the only difference between volunteers being the anatomical area of application of the formulation. This will be determined by chance. The active participation of the participant is requested for the application of the formulations on the skin twice a day during the trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2023
CompletedSeptember 6, 2023
September 1, 2023
5 months
November 1, 2022
September 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of erythema severity via erythema index with and without silicon-based formulations.
Erythema severity is measured using the erythema index (EI). EI will be evaluated by a Mexameter by means of duplicate measurements per skin area in arbitrary units.
21+-2 days maximum
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time needed for the scab to fall off
21+-2 days maximum
Volume of microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) and recovery time
21+-2 days maximum
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONFormulation 1
EXPERIMENTALFormulation 2
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Silicone-based formulation registered as a European class IIa, TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) and FDA listed Class I medical device (wound dressing).
Silicone-based formulation registered as a European class IIa, TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) and FDA listed Class I medical device (wound dressing).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy adult volunteers age ≥18 years to 50 years
- Subjects must be willing and able to participate as required by the protocol.
- Subjects must be willing and able to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of any relevant skin or systemic disease (for example diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, chronic or acute skin disease) possibly affecting the wound healing of the test site.
- Any skin alteration (for example tattoo or scar) on the test site.
- Test sites with terminal hairs
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- History of hypertrophic scars or keloid formation or a similar abnormal wound healing.
- Intake of any drug which in the evaluation of the investigator may interfere with the interpretation of trial results or are known to cause clinically relevant interferences.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 36 kg/m².
- Have any other condition (including drug abuse, alcohol abuse, or psychiatric disorder) that, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes the patient from following and completing the protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stratpharma AGlead
- University Hospital, Genevacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève
Geneva, Switzerland
Related Publications (7)
Laubach HJ, Tannous Z, Anderson RR, Manstein D. Skin responses to fractional photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Feb;38(2):142-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20254.
PMID: 16392146BACKGROUNDSandhofer M, Schauer P. The safety, efficacy, and tolerability of a novel silicone gel dressing following dermatological surgery. Skinmed. 2012 Nov-Dec;10(6):S1-7.
PMID: 23346665BACKGROUNDMonk EC, Benedetto EA, Benedetto AV. Successful treatment of nonhealing scalp wounds using a silicone gel. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Jan;40(1):76-9. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12366. Epub 2013 Nov 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 24267314BACKGROUNDAbdlaty R, Hayward J, Farrell T, Fang Q. Skin erythema and pigmentation: a review of optical assessment techniques. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021 Mar;33:102127. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102127. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
PMID: 33276114BACKGROUNDGarbarino F, Migliorati S, Farnetani F, De Pace B, Ciardo S, Manfredini M, Reggiani Bonetti L, Kaleci S, Chester J, Pellacani G. Nodular skin lesions: correlation of reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography features. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jan;34(1):101-111. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15953. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
PMID: 31520439BACKGROUNDDel Rio-Sancho S, Christen-Zaech S, Martinez DA, Punchera J, Guerrier S, Laubach HJ. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography coupled with artificial intelligence algorithms as tool to investigate wound healing: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded pilot study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Aug;39(8):1481-1488. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20478. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
PMID: 39688344DERIVEDDel Rio-Sancho S, Christen-Zaech S, Alvarez Martinez D, Punchera J, Merat R, Laubach HJ. Comparing Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy on the In Vivo Healing Process of Lesions Induced by Fractional Photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2025 Jan;57(1):121-129. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23841. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
PMID: 39245876DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hans J. Laubauch, Dr. med.
University Hospital, Geneva
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2022
First Posted
November 14, 2022
Study Start
March 21, 2023
Primary Completion
August 31, 2023
Study Completion
August 31, 2023
Last Updated
September 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share