MargheRITA (Remote Intelligence for Therapeutic Adherence)
MargheRITA
Evaluation of Performance and Safety of APP RITA in Increasing the Therapeutic Adherence of Onco-Hematological Patients - a Prospective Monocentric Pre-Market Study with a Historical Group of Comparison
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is essential to improve clinical efficiency and management of hematological and oncological patients treated on an outpatient basis. The most promising operative way to achieve this result is the development of tele-oncology platforms, that allow not only a telemedicine visit, but also the patient support in the daily management of the disease and related disorders, as well as treatments and their complications. In this perspective, the RITA communication platform should be able to support the patient, the caregiver, the physician and the general practitioner in the management of the disease and its treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable multiple-myeloma
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable multiple-myeloma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 4, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2023
CompletedNovember 6, 2024
February 1, 2023
8 months
December 30, 2021
November 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluating changes in actual dose intensity
The primary outcome is defined as the comparison between the proportion of patients with at least 20% of increase in the relative dose intensity (defined as the ratio of delivered dose intensity to the prescribed referenced dose intensity, expressed as a percentage) of anticancer treatment during the study period in the two arms (i.e., intervention and historical group). The actual delivered dose intensity will be evaluated at each follow up visit through the drug accountability performed onsite.
Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of grade 3-4 adverse events
Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Number of visits to the Emergency Room
Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Number of days in hospital
Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Quality of life change - Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L
Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Quality of life change - Questionnaire EORTC QLQC30
Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Minor complications
Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Safety Outcome - Adverse events
Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months
Study Arms (2)
App RITA
EXPERIMENTALThe interventional study group will use the Device Rita, an application that allow the oncological and onco-hematological patients to receive and communicate information about the quality of life and about the treatment related adverse events, providing a support in the therapy management. The access to the app functionalities is granted when the physician habilitates the personal profile. The app can be also used from people designated from the patient as caregiver, who can view the data inserted by the patient and, if enabled, they can insert the data for the patient.
Retrospective Historical
NO INTERVENTIONThis clinical trial has no control intervention; on the other hand, the clinical outcomes of this treatment will be compared with the retrospective clinical data obtained from a historical group of comparison. The historic control used in this clinical trial is specifically selected to reflect the endpoints. According to a feasibility phase of this study, the information on the date of start and end of treatments is routinely collected in the medical records of patients, and for this reason, these data are potentially already available for the historical control group.
Interventions
The RITA "Remote Intelligence for Therapeutic Adherence" application was designed, on the doctor's side, as a support for the management of the onco-hematological patient and, on the patient's side, as a first aid tool for the management of the most common problems, as well as an efficient and "non-invasive" means of communication with the doctor. The system also allows the caregiver and general practitioner to be included in the communication group. The added value of the app consists in improving the relationship between the patient and the doctor, creating an effective communication channel, increasing the safety the patient has when facing his difficult path, reducing the number of visits to the facility and, in general, making those visits more efficient, thus creating savings both in terms of time and resources.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form (ICF) prior to any study related procedures being conducted;
- Patients who are ≥ 18 years old;
- Patients who are diagnosed with a onco-hematologic disease, namely: Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma, Solitary Plasmocytoma, Amyloidosis, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, B cells non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, T cells non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Acute myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorder;
- Patients who receive a standard of care therapy for their disease, independently from the route of administration;
- Patients in their first or subsequent line of therapy;
- Patients at the beginning of the treatment, or during therapy;
- Life expectancy \> 6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients treated with radiotherapy only;
- Presence of clinical conditions that will impair the adherence to the treatment (ie, concomitant tumor on treatment, severe neurologic disease, drug or alcohol abuse etc.);
- Patient unable to use a smartphone and/or a computer (ie blindness, inability to use a smartphone or a computer etc.);
- Major psychopathology or cognitive impairment likely in the judgment of the research staff to interfere with the participation or completion of the protocol;
- Patient enrolled in another clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo - SSD Ematologia - Neoplasie Ematologiche P.O. San Carlo
Milan, Milano, 20153, Italy
Related Publications (10)
Sandstrom M, Wilen J, Oftedal G, Hansson Mild K. Mobile phone use and subjective symptoms. Comparison of symptoms experienced by users of analogue and digital mobile phones. Occup Med (Lond). 2001 Feb;51(1):25-35. doi: 10.1093/occmed/51.1.25.
PMID: 11235824BACKGROUNDOftedal G, Wilen J, Sandstrom M, Mild KH. Symptoms experienced in connection with mobile phone use. Occup Med (Lond). 2000 May;50(4):237-45. doi: 10.1093/occmed/50.4.237.
PMID: 10912374BACKGROUNDChia SE, Chia HP, Tan JS. Prevalence of headache among handheld cellular telephone users in Singapore: a community study. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Nov;108(11):1059-62. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081059.
PMID: 11102297BACKGROUNDKoivisto M, Haarala C, Krause CM, Revonsuo A, Laine M, Hamalainen H. GSM phone signal does not produce subjective symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001 Apr;22(3):212-5. doi: 10.1002/bem.41.
PMID: 11255218BACKGROUNDHocking B. Preliminary report: symptoms associated with mobile phone use. Occup Med (Lond). 1998 Sep;48(6):357-60. doi: 10.1093/occmed/48.6.357.
PMID: 10024730BACKGROUNDHietanen M, Hamalainen AM, Husman T. Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: no causal link. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002 May;23(4):264-70. doi: 10.1002/bem.10016.
PMID: 11948605BACKGROUNDWilen J, Sandstrom M, Hansson Mild K. Subjective symptoms among mobile phone users--a consequence of absorption of radiofrequency fields? Bioelectromagnetics. 2003 Apr;24(3):152-9. doi: 10.1002/bem.10101.
PMID: 12669297BACKGROUNDKoivisto M, Revonsuo A, Krause C, Haarala C, Sillanmaki L, Laine M, Hamalainen H. Effects of 902 MHz electromagnetic field emitted by cellular telephones on response times in humans. Neuroreport. 2000 Feb 7;11(2):413-5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200002070-00038.
PMID: 10674497BACKGROUNDOftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A, Stovner LJ. Mobile phone headache: a double blind, sham-controlled provocation study. Cephalalgia. 2007 May;27(5):447-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01336.x. Epub 2007 Mar 14.
PMID: 17359515BACKGROUNDRubin GJ, Hahn G, Everitt BS, Cleare AJ, Wessely S. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study. BMJ. 2006 Apr 15;332(7546):886-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38765.519850.55. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
PMID: 16520326BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alessandro Flavio Ferri
Advice Pharma Group S.r.l.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2021
First Posted
March 2, 2022
Study Start
June 4, 2022
Primary Completion
January 16, 2023
Study Completion
January 16, 2023
Last Updated
November 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share