Impact of Face Masks on 6MWD in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension
Impact of Face Masks on the Six Minute Walking Distance in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective, Randomized Cross-over Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
122
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is classified according to the Nice Classification into different etiologies, including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a disease of the pulmonary arteriolar vasculature (Class I), and forms of pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (Class II), lung disease (Class III), pulmonary artery obstructions including chronic pulmonary embolism (Class IV) or other less common causes (Class V). Patients with PH are at risk in the current COVID 19 pandemic. The course of the disease and the prognosis of the patients are assessed on the basis of various parameters and therapy is adapted accordingly. In addition to clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory examinations, cardiopulmonary performance tests such as the 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) are of particular significance. According to the ESC/ERS guidelines for PH and the recommendations of the Cologne Consensus Conference, exercise performance is a central criterion for prognostication and treatment decisions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals require the constant use of face masks for patients, in most cases also during the 6 minute walking test. We suspect a performance-reducing effect of face masks, thus impacting the results of the 6MWD. A systematic error in the assessment of cardiopulmonary performance should be revealed by comparing the results of the 6MWD with and without mask (particularly surgical mask and FFP2 mask).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2022
CompletedJuly 21, 2022
July 1, 2022
1.2 years
November 4, 2020
July 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intra-individual difference in six-minute-walking-distance (6MWD) with versus without face mask
Patients repeat a walking-test, conducting 2 walks on one day while a Follow-Up-visit. Change in six-minutes-walking-distance will be measured intra-individually. Patients are walking without mask (control) and wearing a mask (intervention). Minimum 1 hour of rest in between control and intervention. A cross-over design is performed with randomization, if mask will be used in the first six-minutes-walking.
one day while follow-up visit in PAH-center
Secondary Outcomes (5)
PAH-specific Quality of life Baseline
while follow-up 1 day visit in PAH-center
Depression Baseline
while follow-up 1 day visit in PAH-center
Anxiety Baseline
while follow-up 1 day visit in PAH-center
Intra-individual difference in pSO2 performing a six-minutes-walking-test (6MWT) with face mask
one day while follow-up-visit in PAH-center
Intra-individual difference in Borg dyspnea score after a six-minutes-walking-test (6MWT) with versus without face mask
one day while follow-up-visit in PAH-center
Study Arms (2)
with mask (FFP2 mask or surgical mask)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient is Walking with mouth/nose-mask for 6 Minutes.
without mask
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatient is Walking without mouth/nose-mask for 6 Minutes.
Interventions
Patients conducting a six-minutes-walking test
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Regular 6MWD in the last 24 months, at least 1 test per 24 months
- Pulmonary (arterial) hypertension according to the Nice Classification Type I-V
- NYHA-WHO/FC I - III
- Lung function test performed within 6 months
- Age ≥18 years
- Severity of symptoms and specific therapy stable during the last 4 weeks
- General ability to participate in the study
- Ability to give consent
You may not qualify if:
- Contact allergy to face mask materials
- Significant peripheral arterial occlusive disease (Fontaine ≥ IIb)
- Muscular or orthopedic diseases of the lower extremities that contribute to reduced resilience
- Relevant coronary heart disease (angina pectoris ≥ CCS II or positive stress test, myocardial infarction or bypass surgery within the last 3 months)
- inability to perform the 6-minute walk test (mental, physical) or lack of ability to provide essential information (questionnaire, Borg level)
- Uncontrolled high blood pressure (≥140/90 mmHg or ≥160/100 mmHg with 3 antihypertensive drugs) or resting heart rate ≥ 100 b.p.m.)
- Fresh fractures / broken bones (within the last 3 months)
- Not able to give consent Insufficient ability to walk (NYHA IV, immobility, other ailments)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Cologne
Cologne, Germany
Related Publications (11)
Tschope C, Birner C, Bohm M, Bruder O, Frantz S, Luchner A, Maier L, Stork S, Kherad B, Laufs U. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current management and future strategies : Expert opinion on the behalf of the Nucleus of the "Heart Failure Working Group" of the German Society of Cardiology (DKG). Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Jan;107(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1170-6. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
PMID: 29018938BACKGROUNDEikenberry SE, Mancuso M, Iboi E, Phan T, Eikenberry K, Kuang Y, Kostelich E, Gumel AB. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infect Dis Model. 2020 Apr 21;5:293-308. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.04.001. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32355904BACKGROUNDGreenhalgh T, Schmid MB, Czypionka T, Bassler D, Gruer L. Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis. BMJ. 2020 Apr 9;369:m1435. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1435. No abstract available.
PMID: 32273267BACKGROUNDLiang M, Gao L, Cheng C, Zhou Q, Uy JP, Heiner K, Sun C. Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Jul-Aug;36:101751. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101751. Epub 2020 May 28.
PMID: 32473312BACKGROUNDLyu W, Wehby GL. Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Aug;39(8):1419-1425. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
PMID: 32543923BACKGROUNDWorby CJ, Chang HH. Face mask use in the general population and optimal resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 13;11(1):4049. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17922-x.
PMID: 32792562BACKGROUNDRoberge RJ, Kim JH, Benson SM. Absence of consequential changes in physiological, thermal and subjective responses from wearing a surgical mask. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2012 Apr 15;181(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
PMID: 22326638BACKGROUNDRoberge RJ, Coca A, Williams WJ, Palmiero AJ, Powell JB. Surgical mask placement over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: physiological effects on healthcare workers. Respirology. 2010 Apr;15(3):516-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01713.x. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
PMID: 20337987BACKGROUNDLi R, Pei S, Chen B, Song Y, Zhang T, Yang W, Shaman J. Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):489-493. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3221. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
PMID: 32179701BACKGROUNDFikenzer S, Laufs U. Response to Letter to the editors referring to Fikenzer, S., Uhe, T., Lavall, D., Rudolph, U., Falz, R., Busse, M., Hepp, P., & Laufs, U. (2020). Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. Clinical research in cardiology: official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 1-9. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Dec;109(12):1600. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01736-4. Epub 2020 Sep 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 32989474BACKGROUNDWissmuller M, Wartner V, Hohmann C, Adler J, Kramer T, Hellmich M, Gerhardt F, Baldus S, Rosenkranz S. Impact of face masks on the 6-minute walk distance in pulmonary hypertension patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective, randomised cross-over study. Eur Respir J. 2023 Oct 26;62(4):2201454. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01454-2022. Print 2023 Oct.
PMID: 37827573DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Max VJ Wissmueller, MD
University Hospital of Cologne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. med. Max Wissmueller
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2020
First Posted
February 25, 2022
Study Start
November 15, 2020
Primary Completion
February 2, 2022
Study Completion
March 31, 2022
Last Updated
July 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share