Feasibility of ESWT Treatment in Post-stroke Patients With Triceps Sural Spasticity
Waves2021
ESWT Treatment in Post-stroke Patients With Triceps Sural: a Feasibility RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective is to evaluate the feasibility of two different rehabilitation protocols that differed from the number of treatment sessions (1 session of ESWT versus 3 weekly sessions of ESWT), in patients with triceps surae spasticity after stroke. In both arms the other ESWT parameters (types of ESWT, intensity, frequency, location) and stretching sessions are the same. Secondary objectives: to compare functional performances in these two groups of patients receiving the different rehabilitation protocol with ESWT, using the following parameters: \- Six Minutes walking test (6MWT) ; - Time Up \& Go (TUG); - Modified Ashworth scale (MAS); - Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); - passive ankle range of motion (p-ROM), pain (NRS); and presence of ankle clonus. These parameters are assessed during baseline (T0), after 4 weeks (T1) and after 12 weeks (T2).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 22, 2022
CompletedJune 24, 2025
November 1, 2021
1 year
February 5, 2022
June 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of two kind treatments proposed
The intervention is feasible if at least 80% of the enrolled patients complete the entire treatment foreseen in the allocation group
T1 after 4 weeks from T0 (Enrollment)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in Walking Resistance
T0 Enrollment, T1 after 4 weeks from T0, T2 after 12 weeks from T0
Change in Level of mobility and balance
T0 Enrollment, T1 after 4 weeks from T0, T2 after 12 weeks from T0
Change in spasticity
T0 Enrollment, T1 after 4 weeks from T0, T2 after 12 weeks from T0
Change in Passive ROM of the ankle in dorsiflexion
T0 Enrollment, T1 after 4 weeks from T0, T2 after 12 weeks from T0
Change in Leg Pain
T0 Enrollment, T1 after 4 weeks from T0, T2 after 12 weeks from T0
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group I
EXPERIMENTALGroup II
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
3 weeks intervention: * 3 sessions of ESWT, once a week * 6 sessions of passive stretching, twice a week
3 weeks intervention: * 1 sessions of ESWT + 2 sessions of Sham, once a week * 6 sessions of passive stretching, twice a week
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients of legal age
- Time elapsed since the stroke between 6 and 60 months
- Autonomous or supervised walking with or without aids
- Spasticity of the sural triceps\> 1 on the MAS scale
You may not qualify if:
- Joint stiffness of the lower limbs due to other pathologies (ex orthopedic or rheumatological);
- Conditions that interfere with evaluation or collaboration in rehabilitation treatment (major psychiatric illnesses, clearly detectable cognitive deficits, severe pre-existing disabilities, sensory disturbances, etc.)
- Focal antispasmodic toxin treatments in the previous 3 months or phenolic blocks in the previous 9 months in the treatment region
- Treatments with central antispasmodic drugs with dosage modifications in the last week of starting treatment
- Individual neurorehabilitation treatments in progress
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Operational Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation AUSL - IRCCS Reggio Emilia
Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, 42123, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefania Testoni, Dr
Azienda AUSLRE
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2022
First Posted
February 24, 2022
Study Start
July 22, 2021
Primary Completion
July 22, 2022
Study Completion
July 22, 2022
Last Updated
June 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2021-11