Robotic Telerehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Stroke
TELEREHAB
Robotic Telerehabilitation: Feasibility of a Robotic Treatment of the Upper Limb With Remote Supervision in Patients With Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of the study is to investigate the feasibility and the effects of a home-based upper-limb rehabilitation treatment (based on teleconsulting, telemonitoring, and robotic telerehabilitation using the robot Icone and integrated sensors) in patients with stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started May 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2022
CompletedOctober 15, 2024
October 1, 2024
3 months
February 11, 2022
October 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment Upper Extremity motor functioning
It is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 66 points (normal).
Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Reliability of the remote evaluation of the Fugl-meyer Assessment Upper Extremity motor functioning (FMA)
The value of the FMA obtained by means of online observation of the patient will be assessed in terms of reliability with the value obtained by means of direct observation, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Before the intervention
System Usability Scale
It is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate usability. It ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better usability.
After a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
It is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the acceptance of the provided intervention. It comprises several questions rated on a 7-point likert scale.
After a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Likert for Satisfaction
Satisfaction will be assessed using a 11-point likert scale. It ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores mean higher satisfaction.
After a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Secondary Outcomes (32)
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment Upper Extremity motor functioning
Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment - Sensory functioning
Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Fugl-meyer Assessment - Sensory functioning
Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Numeric Rating Scale for pain
Before the intervention, after a 2-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
Changes in Numeric Rating Scale for pain
Before the intervention, after a 4-week robotic rehabilitation intervention
- +27 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Robotic group
EXPERIMENTALIn the robotic group, each patient undergoes 20 upper limb robotic telerehabilitation sessions, each session lasting 1 hour. The frequency is 5 sessions/week. Each session is performed at the patient's home, with direct supervision of a caregiver and remote supervision of a physical therapist, using three webcams able to show (a) the frontal and (b) the sagittal plane of the patient, as well as (c) the monitor of the robot.
Interventions
The upper limb rehabilitation will be carried out with the planar rehabilitation robot Icone (a CE Class IIA medical device manufactured by Heaxel). The proposed exercises require the patient to move a cursor on the screen using the end-effector of the robot to reach specific points (planar reaching exercises). When the patient is able to perform these exercises independently, the robot assists the movement by minimizing the interaction force applied to the hand and limiting itself to acquiring the kinematic and dynamic parameters of the exercise, which are useful in determining the state of motor skills. Icone assist the subject by applying a force to his hand that helps him complete the task in the phases where the patient plans the movement correctly but is unable to complete it. As a result, the system will enable you to perform planar elbow and shoulder movements in active, passive, or active-assisted modes, with visual and acoustic feedback.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (verified by MRI or CT);
- time since stroke onset \> 3 months
- cognitive abilities adequate to understand the experiments and the follow instructions
- upper limb impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment - upper extremity score ≤58);
- presence of a caregiver to supervise the treatment
You may not qualify if:
- fixed contractions in the affected limb (ankylosis, Modified Ashworth Scale equal to 4);
- inability to understand the instructions required for the study;
- behavioral disorders that may influence therapeutic activity;
- other orthopedic or neurological diseases
- inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Santa Maria della Provvidenza Center
Rome, 00168, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Germanotta M, Mauro MC, Falchini F, Scotto Di Luzio F, Vollero L, Zollo L, Aprile IG. A robotic rehabilitation intervention in a home setting during the Covid-19 outbreak: a feasibility pilot study in patients with stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Apr 24;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01633-9.
PMID: 40269913DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Irene Aprile, D, PhD
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of the Neurorehabilitation Department, Neurologist, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2022
First Posted
February 22, 2022
Study Start
May 12, 2021
Primary Completion
August 8, 2021
Study Completion
August 8, 2021
Last Updated
October 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10