Standard Patient Training Versus Vik Chatbot Guided Training: a Randomized Controlled Trial for Asthma Patients
AsthmaTrain
2 other identifiers
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The onset of smartphone usage has provided new opportunities for managing patients outside the walls of healthcare facilities. The development of asthma-specific smartphone applications represents an excellent area for partnership between developers and medical teams for delivering therapeutic education at the required time and in a personalised way. Within this context, the overall goal of the AsthmaTrain study is to perform a first, small pilot study comparing a new French-language chat-bot guided asthma patient education programme (the 'Vik' application) with the classic, authority-approved patient education program at the University Hospitals of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. The primary objective is to compare a population of adult patients with asthma and participating in a standard patient education programme with a similar population participating in Vik-guided education programme in terms of change in overall scores on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable asthma
Started May 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 27, 2023
CompletedJanuary 17, 2024
January 1, 2024
1.4 years
February 9, 2022
January 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the total AQLQ score
The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item, 4-domain instrument that can either be self- or interviewer-administered. The recall-time is two weeks. The four domains covered are: (i) symptoms (11 items), (ii) activity limitation (12 items, 5 of which are individualized), (iii) emotional function (5 items), and (iv) environmental exposure (4 items). Each item is ranked by the patient using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Scores range from 1 to 7, higher scores indicate better quality of life and a minimally important difference (for overall scores and for each sub-domain) has been established at 0.5.
baseline to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (27)
Change in the 'symptoms' domain of the AQLQ from baseline to six months
baseline to 6 months
Change in the 'activity limitation' domain of the AQLQ from baseline to six months
baseline to 6 months
Change in the 'emotional function' domain of the AQLQ from baseline to six months
baseline to 6 months
Change in the 'environmental exposure' domain of the AQLQ from baseline to six months
baseline to 6 months
Change in the ACQ-5 score
baseline to 6 months
- +22 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Comparator arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients randomized to this arm will participate in a standard patient education program.
Experimental arm
EXPERIMENTALAll patients randomised to this arm have the opportunity to participate in a patient education programme via a chatbot.
Interventions
The comparator intervention is the usual therapeutic training for patients (ETP) cursus currently used in the General Pulmonology unit at the Arnaud De Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier, France and approved by the French Regional Health Authority for the Occitanie Region \[Agence Régional de Santé Occitanie\].
The experimental intervention consists in providing the patient with access to a specific version of the "Vik-Asthme" chat bot for the duration of the study. Should the patient be unable to use or refuse to use the chatbot, the reasons for refusal will be documented and the patient will proceed with the comparator intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Minimum age: 18
- Physician-confirmed diagnosis of asthma
You may not qualify if:
- Protected populations according to the French Public Health Code Articles L1121-6,8
- The subject has already participated in the present study
- Subject unable to comply with trial procedures/visits
- Potential for interference from another study
- Non-beneficiary of the French single-payer national medical insurance system
- Lack of informed consent
- Patients already using the Vik Asthma application in their daily lives or having already followed a therapeutic education program
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
Related Publications (1)
Suehs CM, Vachier I, Galeazzi D, Vaast F, Cardon F, Molinari N, Bourdin A. Standard patient training versus Vik-Asthme chatbot-guided training: 'AsthmaTrain' - a protocol for a randomised controlled trial for patients with asthma. BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 21;13(2):e067039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067039.
PMID: 36810168BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arnaud Bourdin, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Montpellier
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This protocol aims to compare two different ways of engaging with the patient and teaching. The notion of blinding per se is not adapted to this protocol, which is carried out, for all practical purposes, in an "open" fashion. Nevertheless, the Zelen randomisation procedure, which aims to maintain the comparator arm ignorant of the existence of the experimental arm in order to avoid "resentful demoralisation" effects, may also result in a partial blinding effect.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2022
First Posted
February 21, 2022
Study Start
May 24, 2022
Primary Completion
October 27, 2023
Study Completion
October 27, 2023
Last Updated
January 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Datasets that underlie the results reported in the article (text, tables, figures, and appendices) can be requested after the publication process has been completed. The protocol will be published in an open-access journal. The remaining documents will be made available on the Open Science Framework as they are finalized.
- Access Criteria
- * The data will be used/examined in a not-for-profit manner; * The data will not be used in an attempt to identify a participant or group of participants; * The user does not work for a private insurance company; * The data will not be used in support of any kind of private insurance policy or health penalties; * The data will be used/examined for the advancement of science/teaching while respecting participant/patient privacy and rights; * The user will state why they wish to access the data. * If the data do not fulfil the requirements of the reference methodology (MR-001) (ex: data about religion, etc.), the appropriate CNIL (National Commission for Computing and Liberties) approval has to be obtained by the user. * If the data will be used outside the European Union, standard contractual clauses have to be signed between Montpellier University Hospital and the user before sharing data.
The general goal is to make the study data available to interested researchers as well as to provide proof of transparency for the study. Data will be made available to persons who address a reasonable request to the study director. Individual participant data (and an accompanying data dictionary) will be de-identified and potentially further cleaned or aggregated as the investigators deem necessary to protect participant anonymity. The study protocol, participant information materials, and paper case report form will also be made available to the public.