Effect of Glass Ionomer Cement as an Interim Restoration in Diagnosis of Pulpal Status
Evaluation of the Effect of Glass Ionomer Cement as an Interim Restoration in Diagnosis of Pulpal Status in Permanent Teeth: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
146
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aim: To evaluate whether glass ionomer interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) in asymptomatic teeth with deep cavities can help in determining the pulp status. Methodology: 146 mandibular molars with deep carious lesion having positive response to pulp sensitivity were randomly allocated to two study groups (75-ITR, 71- NON-ITR group). In the first group after partial caries removal(PCR), interim therapeutic restoration of glass ionomer cement (GIC) Ketac molar was placed for one month before definitive adhesive restoration. In NON-ITR group, cavity preparation was similar to ITR group, but definitive restoration was done in the same visit. Two examiners evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes for 18 months. Success was defined as absence of signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis and absence of periapical alterations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2017
CompletedMay 30, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.5 years
May 23, 2017
May 25, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
clinical success
Success was defined as absence of signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain, fistula and swelling), positive response to pulp sensibility tests.
18 months
radiographic success
Absence of periapical alterations (radiolucency at furcal or periapical region, calcification). Pretreatment pulpal diagnosis was considered successful when teeth treated with or without ITR were diagnosed as vital and radiographic signs and symptoms of failure developed.
18 months
Study Arms (2)
ITR group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn ITR group after partial caries removal(PCR), interim therapeutic restoration of glass ionomer cement (GIC) Ketac molar was placed for one month before definitive adhesive restoration
Non ITR group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn NON-ITR group, cavity preparation was similar to ITR group, but definitive restoration was done in the same visit
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- mature permanent mandibular molars having deep carious lesions involving half or more of the dentine detected by radiographic examination,
- pulp sensibility confirmed using the electric pulp test (Digitest D626D; Parkell Electronics, New York, NY) and the cold test (Endo frost, Coltene, Whaledent),
- absence of apical and furcal radiolucency determined by radiographic examination,
- absence of clinical symptoms of irreversible symptoms, fistula, swelling and abnormal tooth mobility.
- Clinical diagnosis of vital pulp was made on the basis of radiographic and clinical examination and the pulp sensibility tests.
You may not qualify if:
- had negative response to vitality tests before or after ITR,
- diabetic, immunocompromised,
- pregnant,
- had a positive history of antibiotic use in past one month or required antibiotic prophylaxis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2017
First Posted
May 30, 2017
Study Start
May 20, 2015
Primary Completion
November 30, 2016
Study Completion
November 30, 2016
Last Updated
May 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share