Effects of Individualized Cognitive Training on Cognition in Heart Failure
SYNAPSE
A Multicenter Randomized Single-blinded Clinical Trial to Investigate the Effects of a Home-based Cognitive Training for individualS Affected bY chroNic heArt Failure: an Individualized Program to increaSE Cognitive Functions
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The SYNAPSE trial is designed to study the effects of an individualized home-based cognitive training program on cognitive functions in heart-failure patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Jan 2023
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 19, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2024
CompletedNovember 14, 2023
November 1, 2023
1.8 years
September 29, 2021
November 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Changes in performance on trained computerized cognitive tasks
Trained version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Reaction time (ms)
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on trained computerized cognitive tasks
Trained version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Accuracy (%)
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on transfer computerized cognitive tasks
Transfer version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Reaction time (ms)
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on transfer computerized cognitive tasks
Transfer version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Accuracy (%)
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in general cognitive functioning
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in quality of life
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (13)
Change in depressive symptomatology
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in anxiety
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Change in perceived stress
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
- +10 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive training followed by usual care
EXPERIMENTALUsual care and cognitive training for 6 weeks, followed by usual care (only) for 6 weeks.
Usual care followed by cognitive training
EXPERIMENTALUsual care (only) for 6 weeks, followed by cognitive training and usual care for 6 weeks.
Interventions
A cognitive training program will be individually developed for each participant based on baseline neuropsychological tests. It will include: Computerized cognitive training: this training include: the Dual-Task, the Stroop and the N-Back task. The tasks are accompanied by feedback based on the participant's responses (e.g., progress graph, feedback, etc.). In order to promote participants' learning, the level of difficulty of the tasks increased as training sessions progressed. Two sets of stimuli will be used to maximize the generalization of learning. Memory training: This training is adapted from the MEMO+ training program (Belleville et al., 2018). These sessions, also home-based, will be done through online video and are covering a variety of topics: memory (normal aging, mnemonic strategies), attention, aging, etc. Each week, participants will be asked to complete the equivalent of 6 training sessions of 15 minutes each, for a total of 1h30 per week.
Participants will be asked to continue the care and follow-up as usually planned with the attending cardiologist. Apart from weekly follow-ups with the research team member, no changes will be made to the participant's medical care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult aged 50 or older
- Have access to Internet
- Have access to a computer or a tablet;
- Have the ability to perform cognitive training;
- Have the ability to read, understand and consent to the informed consent form;
- Have chronic heart failure on tolerated therapy for at least two months;
- Without limitation of physical activity to severe limitation of physical activity (i.e. NYHA class I, class II, class III OR class IV).
You may not qualify if:
- Acute cardiovascular event 1 month before randomization;
- Cardiovascular procedure scheduled within 3 months;
- Uncontrolled diabetes or untreated thyroid dysfunction;
- Current or recent malignancy with a life expectancy of less than 1 year;
- Neurological disease;
- Chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Preventive medicine and physical activity center (centre EPIC), Montreal heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, H1T1N6, Canada
Centre de recherche du centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Related Publications (17)
Turk-Adawi KI, Oldridge NB, Tarima SS, Stason WB, Shepard DS. Cardiac rehabilitation patient and organizational factors: what keeps patients in programs? J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Oct 21;2(5):e000418. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000418.
PMID: 24145743BACKGROUNDResurreccion DM, Moreno-Peral P, Gomez-Herranz M, Rubio-Valera M, Pastor L, Caldas de Almeida JM, Motrico E. Factors associated with non-participation in and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Jan;18(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/1474515118783157. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
PMID: 29909641BACKGROUNDRego MLM, Cabral DAR, Fontes EB. Cognitive Deficit in Heart Failure and the Benefits of Aerobic Physical Activity. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Jan;110(1):91-94. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180002.
PMID: 29538528BACKGROUNDLeto L, Feola M. Cognitive impairment in heart failure patients. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2014 Dec;11(4):316-28. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.04.007.
PMID: 25593581BACKGROUNDHawkins MA, Schaefer JT, Gunstad J, Dolansky MA, Redle JD, Josephson R, Moore SM, Hughes JW. What is your patient's cognitive profile? Three distinct subgroups of cognitive function in persons with heart failure. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 May;28(2):186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
PMID: 25510559BACKGROUNDDoehner W. Dementia and the heart failure patient. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Dec;21(Suppl L):L28-L31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz242. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
PMID: 31885510BACKGROUNDDodson JA, Chaudhry SI. Geriatric conditions in heart failure. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2012 Oct;6(5):404-410. doi: 10.1007/s12170-012-0259-8.
PMID: 23997843BACKGROUNDDickson VV, Tkacs N, Riegel B. Cognitive influences on self-care decision making in persons with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2007 Sep;154(3):424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.058.
PMID: 17719284BACKGROUNDde Tournay-Jette E, Dupuis G, Denault A, Cartier R, Bherer L. The benefits of cognitive training after a coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Behav Med. 2012 Oct;35(5):557-68. doi: 10.1007/s10865-011-9384-y. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
PMID: 22068879BACKGROUNDCannon JA, Moffitt P, Perez-Moreno AC, Walters MR, Broomfield NM, McMurray JJV, Quinn TJ. Cognitive Impairment and Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Card Fail. 2017 Jun;23(6):464-475. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
PMID: 28433667BACKGROUNDBelleville S, Hudon C, Bier N, Brodeur C, Gilbert B, Grenier S, Ouellet MC, Viscogliosi C, Gauthier S. MEMO+: Efficacy, Durability and Effect of Cognitive Training and Psychosocial Intervention in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):655-663. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15192. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
PMID: 29313875BACKGROUNDKua ZJ, Valenzuela M, Dong Y. Can Computerized Cognitive Training Improve Cognition in Patients With Heart Failure?: A Review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;34(2):E19-E27. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000558.
PMID: 30585868BACKGROUNDBherer L. Cognitive plasticity in older adults: effects of cognitive training and physical exercise. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1337:1-6. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12682.
PMID: 25773610BACKGROUNDLampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756. eCollection 2014 Nov.
PMID: 25405755BACKGROUNDLussier M, Gagnon C, Bherer L. An investigation of response and stimulus modality transfer effects after dual-task training in younger and older. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 18;6:129. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00129. eCollection 2012.
PMID: 22629239BACKGROUNDPendlebury ST, Welch SJ, Cuthbertson FC, Mariz J, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Telephone assessment of cognition after transient ischemic attack and stroke: modified telephone interview of cognitive status and telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment versus face-to-face Montreal Cognitive Assessment and neuropsychological battery. Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):227-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673384. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PMID: 23138443BACKGROUNDBlanchette CA, Besnier F, Dupuy EG, Gagnon C, Vincent T, Rouleau JL, Bouabdallaoui N, Grau JI, Racine N, Tournoux F, Apullan FJ, Vitali P, Belleville S, Bherer L. A multicenter randomized single-blinded clinical trial to investigate the effects of an individualized home-based cognitive training program in patients with chronic heart failure: the SYNAPSE protocol. Trials. 2025 Nov 17;26(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09193-y.
PMID: 41250150DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Louis Bherer, PhD
Montreal Heart Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single blind masking: the research personnel performing the outcome assessments at baseline, between the intervention (two months) and after the intervention (four months) will be blinded to groups' intervention order. Participants will be aware of the order in which they receive the intervention.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate scientific director, Direction of prevention, Montreal heart Institute
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2021
First Posted
February 4, 2022
Study Start
January 19, 2023
Primary Completion
November 1, 2024
Study Completion
November 1, 2024
Last Updated
November 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share