Effects of Comprehensive Augmented and Virtual Reality in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of augmented and virtual reality-based rehabilitation programs on improving upper extremity function in subacute stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2022
CompletedFebruary 7, 2022
January 1, 2022
14 days
December 9, 2021
January 23, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity score
range (0-126), higher scores mean a better motor function
Baseline
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity score
range (0-126), higher scores mean a better motor function
2 weeks after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Box and Block Test
Baseline
Box and Block Test
2 weeks after intervention
Modified Barthel Index
Baseline
Modified Barthel Index
2 weeks after intervention
Motor Activity Log of Amount of Use and Quality of Movement
Baseline
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Augmented reality and virtual reality rehabilitation
EXPERIMENTALThis group underwent augmented reality and virtual reality rehabilitation for 60 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 2 weeks.
Conventional occupational therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group underwent conventional occutational therapy for 60 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 2 weeks.
Interventions
This group underwent augmented reality and virtual reality rehabilitation with 4 different systems. The RAPAEL Smart Glove® is a wearable sensory system that contains a single 9-axis movement and position sensor with 3 acceleration channels, 3 angular rate channels, and 3 magnetic field channels that measures wrist movements, and 5 bending sensors that measure finger movements. The RAPAEL Smart Board® is a rehabilitation system used to improve arm function by practicing gravity-compensated movements. The RehabMaster® is a game-based Kinect sensor AR rehabilitation system which uses a 3D camera to digitize patient movements and quickly analyze their range of motion, speed, motion angle, and movement cycles. rehabilitation exercise using games to encourage active arm and trunk movements and promote successful rehabilitation. The COG-Trainer® is a VR system that uses a training device synchronized with the screen through simulation.
The group underwent standard ocupational therapy, such as range of motion and strengthening exercises for the affected upper extremity, table-top activities, and training for activities of daily living.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First ever stroke
- Onset of stroke less than 3 months
- Sufficiently medically stable to participate in active rehabilitation
- Mild-to-moderate upper extremity motor impairments (Brunnstrom stage for the upper extremity 2-6).
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive impairment (defined as score \< 10 on the Mini-Mental State Examination)
- Evidence of apraxia
- Clinical history of neglect
- Previous upper extremity hemiplegia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The researcher responsible for randomization was independent from the assessors, assuring blindness to treatment allocation and randomization procedures. The blinded assessor performed the baseline and post-treatment assessments. The patients and the occupational therapists were not blinded due to the nature of treatment modality.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D, PhD, Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2021
First Posted
January 18, 2022
Study Start
November 19, 2018
Primary Completion
December 3, 2018
Study Completion
October 21, 2019
Last Updated
February 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01