Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Perineal Message and Childbirth
The Effect of Instrumented and Non-Instrumental Perineal Massage on Birth Results in the Active Phase of Labor
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Today, the increase in the costs of applications in the health care system makes it difficult for easy and inexpensive methods to be used based on evidence. In this study, the episiotomy rate, episiotomy length, perineal pain at birth and postpartum period, perineal trauma, newborn 1st min. and 5 min. It was planned as a Randomized Controlled Experimental study to examine the effect of APGAR score on birth outcomes such as the duration of the first and second stages of labor and birth satisfaction. The universe of the research was carried out between December 2021-2022 in University Hospital and City Hospital Pregnant women at 38-42 weeks of gestation who are admitted to the maternity ward to give birth. Power analysis was performed using the GPower program in order to sample size. In determining the sample size, the article titled "The Effect of Perineal Massage During Labor in Nulliparous Women on Birth Comfort, Perineal Pain and Trauma" (Yaşar, 2019) was used. Considering the total mean scores of the GCS scale in intervention and control groups, Type 1 error amount was 0.01, test power was 0.99, and effect size was 1.1276841; The minimum required sample size was determined as 80 (40 interventions + 40 control groups) for the intervention and control groups. In line with these data, it was decided that the sample size would be 120 pregnant women who agreed to be in the study and met the inclusion criteria, 40 in the intervention-1 group to be given instrumental perineal massage, 40 in the intervention-2 group that would receive non-instrumental perineal massage, and 40 in the control group. Frequency and mean values will be used in the evaluation of descriptive data, and independent sample t-test, chi-square test, fisher chi-square test and ANOVA will be used in the analysis of data showing normal distribution. The Mann Whitney U test is planned to be used in the analysis of data that do not show normal distribution. Normal distribution in the analysis of the relationship between prenatal instrument perineal massage and GCS scores, quality of pain, length of episiotomy, condition of the perineal region, duration of the first and second stages of labor, total delivery time, APGAR 1st and 5th minute scores, and parameters related to postpartum satisfaction Pearson correlation test will be used. All the results will be evaluated at the 95% confidence interval, at the 0.05 significance level.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 13, 2023
CompletedOctober 31, 2023
October 1, 2023
1.1 years
December 4, 2021
October 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Labor Evaluation Form Part I
I. It will be applied in the latent phase of labor (cervical dilatation: 0-4 cm). II.It will be applied in the active phase of labor (cervical dilatation: 4-8 cm). III.Until two days after birth
The progression time of vaginal dilatation at birth may vary from person to person. For this reason, the questionnaire will be applied at the beginning of the birth process, before the vaginal dilatation is 4 cm.
Visual analog scale
Birth pain. VAS is a horizontal or vertical line of 10 cm/100 mm that starts with "No pain" and ends with "Unbearable pain." No pain is written on one end and very severe or unbearable pain is written on the other end on the scale during the measurement and the patient marks their current state on this line. The length of the distance from no pain to the point marked by the patient indicates the patient's pain.
The progression time of vaginal dilatation at birth may vary from person to person. For this reason, the questionnaire will be applied at the beginning of the birth process, before the vaginal dilatation is 4 cm.
Labor Evaluation Form Part II
It will be applied during the active period of labor (cervical dilatation: 5-8 cm). II.It will be applied in the active phase of labor (cervical dilatation: 4-8 cm). III.Until two days after birth
The progression time of vaginal dilatation at birth may vary from person to person. For this reason, the questionnaire will be applied at the beginning of the birth process, before the vaginal dilatation is 8 cm.
Labor Evaluation Form Part III
It will be applied within the first 48 hours after the birth is completed.
This form is evaluated within 48 hours of postpartum
REEDA Scale
This scale includes five factors that indicate perineal wound healing. These; These are redness (redness), edema (edema), ecchymosis (ecchymosis), discharge (discharge), approximation (approaching wound ends). Each factor takes values between 0-3. A total REEDA score (0-15) is obtained by evaluating these five improvement factors. The lowest score is 0 points, the highest score is 15 points. Higher scores indicate more tissue trauma.
The REEDA score is evaluated in the 48th hour after delivery.
Birth satisfaction scale
The original of the scale used to evaluate women's perceptions of birth satisfaction is 30 items and is a five-point Likert type. It consists of 3 main themes: quality of care, personal characteristics of women and stress experienced during childbirth. A minimum of 30 and a maximum of 150 points can be obtained from the scale. The higher the score, the higher the level of satisfaction.
This form is evaluated postpartum 10th day.
Visual analog scale
It is a scale used to evaluate the severity of pain. participants are asked to mark or say the point on the line numbered from zero to 10 that corresponds to the pain.Zero points; While expressing no pain, 10 points indicates the most severe pain experienced.
The VAS is evaluated postpartum10th day.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Visual analog scale
The progression time of vaginal dilatation at birth may vary from person to person. For this reason, the questionnaire will be applied at the beginning of the birth process, before the vaginal dilatation is 8 cm.
Visual analog scale
The VAS is evaluated within 48 hours of postpartum after delivery
REEDA Scale
The REEDA score is evaluated in the postpartum 10th day after delivery.
Study Arms (2)
Initiative group I
EXPERIMENTALIn the active phase of labor, perineal massage will be performed with the device at an interval of one hour.
Initiative group II
EXPERIMENTALDuring the active phase of labor, manual perineal massage will be performed with an interval of one hour.
Interventions
In the active phase of labor, perineal massage will be performed with an instrument twice with an interval of one hour.
In the active phase of labor, manual perineal massage is performed twice an hour apart.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Volunteer to participate in the study
- No vision and hearing problems
- At least primary school graduate and no language problems
- Those between the ages of 18-35
- th-42nd of pregnancy. in the week
- Does not feel uncomfortable being touched by the genital area
- Those who are willing to have a normal delivery and have a vaginal delivery indication
- During the first stage of labor, analgesia and anesthesia are not used.
- Head presenter
- Single pregnancy
- Those who do not have a risky pregnancy (Dystosiler, Presanta previa, threat of premature birth, premature rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, eclampsia, hyperemesis gravidarum, ablatio placenta, placenta accreta, intrauterine growth retardation, cord anomaly, vaginal bleeding, etc.)
You may not qualify if:
- Non-Turkish citizens
- Planned cesarean section
- Having genital infection
- A different perineal massager
- Pregnant women with narcotic and analgesic addiction and who were administered narcotic analgesics during the data collection process.
- Known chronic disease (heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, kidney disease, etc.) systemic disease
- Having a neurological disease
- Non-pharmacological pain control methods at birth (respiratory exercise techniques, massage, intradermal water injection, relaxation and relaxation methods, mental/mental stimulation, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, etc.). using.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Meryem Metinoğlu
Tekirdağ, Süleymanpaşa, 59030, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Abdelhakim AM, Eldesouky E, Elmagd IA, Mohammed A, Farag EA, Mohammed AE, Hamam KM, Hussein AS, Ali AS, Keshta NHA, Hamza M, Samy A, Abdel-Latif AA. Antenatal perineal massage benefits in reducing perineal trauma and postpartum morbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Sep;31(9):1735-1745. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04302-8. Epub 2020 May 12.
PMID: 32399905BACKGROUNDDencker A, Nilsson C, Begley C, Jangsten E, Mollberg M, Patel H, Wigert H, Hessman E, Sjoblom H, Sparud-Lundin C. Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: A systematic review. Women Birth. 2019 Apr;32(2):99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
PMID: 30115515BACKGROUNDJahani Shoorab N, Mirteimouri M, Taghipour A, Latifnejad Roudsari R. Women's Experiences of Emotional Recovery from Childbirth-Related Perineal Trauma: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2019 Jul;7(3):181-191. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.44993.
PMID: 31341917BACKGROUNDO'Connell MA, Khashan AS, Leahy-Warren P, Stewart F, O'Neill SM. Interventions for fear of childbirth including tocophobia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 7;7(7):CD013321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013321.pub2.
PMID: 34231203BACKGROUNDManresa M, Pereda A, Bataller E, Terre-Rull C, Ismail KM, Webb SS. Incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jun;30(6):853-868. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03894-0. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
PMID: 30770967BACKGROUNDKavvadias T, Hoesli I. The EpiNo(R) Device: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Impact on Pelvic Floor-Implications for Future Research. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016;2016:3818240. doi: 10.1155/2016/3818240. Epub 2016 Feb 14.
PMID: 26981126BACKGROUNDMartin CH, Fleming V. The birth satisfaction scale. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):124-35. doi: 10.1108/09526861111105086.
PMID: 21456488BACKGROUNDDemsar K, Svetina M, Verdenik I, Tul N, Blickstein I, Globevnik Velikonja V. Tokophobia (fear of childbirth): prevalence and risk factors. J Perinat Med. 2018 Feb 23;46(2):151-154. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0282.
PMID: 28379837BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Meryem Metinoğlu
TNKU
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the design of the study, single or double masking cannot be done.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2021
First Posted
January 13, 2022
Study Start
November 22, 2021
Primary Completion
December 12, 2022
Study Completion
July 13, 2023
Last Updated
October 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share