Study Stopped
During interim analysis, it appeared there were no difference in groups
Do Peanut Shaped Birthing Balls Reduce the Length of Labor in Patients With Epidural Analgesia?
1 other identifier
interventional
101
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Labor patients who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be consented to be participate in this study to determine if the use of a peanut shaped birthing ball reduces the length of labor and reduces the incidence of cesarean section. Subjects will be randomized at the time of consent to either use the birthing ball or not use the birthing ball from the time of labor analgesia until complete cervical dilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 4, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 26, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 29, 2019
CompletedMarch 18, 2022
July 1, 2018
2.6 years
August 25, 2015
August 22, 2018
March 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Length of Labor
time in minutes will be calculated from epidural catheter insertion until delivery
up to 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Maternal Satisfaction
length of labor, up to 24 hours
Participant Cesarean Delivery Incidence-Mode of Deliveries
up to 24 hours
Number of Participants With Post-delivery Complications
up to 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
peanut ball
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe peanut shaped birthing ball after labor analgesia will be utilized
no peanut ball
NO INTERVENTIONthe peanut shaped birthing ball will not be utilized during labor
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- nulliparous
- \>/= 18 years of age
- not allergic to medications used for labor analgesia
- no contraindications to labor analgesia
- ASA I-II
- EGA \>/= 37 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- under age 18
- Spanish speaking only
- multiparous
- EGA \<37 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Novant Health-Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Related Publications (7)
Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ullrich FA. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):645-53. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030. No abstract available.
PMID: 16129992BACKGROUNDHalpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, Barrett JF, Rice A. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1998 Dec 23-30;280(24):2105-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.24.2105.
PMID: 9875879BACKGROUNDMartin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Jan 15;64(1):1-65.
PMID: 25603115BACKGROUNDAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.
PMID: 24565430BACKGROUNDTussey CM, Botsios E, Gerkin RD, Kelly LA, Gamez J, Mensik J. Reducing Length of Labor and Cesarean Surgery Rate Using a Peanut Ball for Women Laboring With an Epidural. J Perinat Educ. 2015;24(1):16-24. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.24.1.16.
PMID: 26937158BACKGROUNDTsen LC, Thue B, Datta S, Segal S. Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology. 1999 Oct;91(4):920-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199910000-00010.
PMID: 10519493BACKGROUNDBISHOP EH. PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION. Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Aug;24:266-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 14199536BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Lynnette Harris, BSN
- Organization
- Wake Forest School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert D'Angelo, MD
WakeForest School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2015
First Posted
September 3, 2015
Study Start
June 4, 2015
Primary Completion
December 26, 2017
Study Completion
December 26, 2017
Last Updated
March 18, 2022
Results First Posted
April 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share