Effects of a Machine Learning-based Lower Limb Exercise Training System for Knee Pain
Development and Randomized Controlled Trial of an AI-powered Technological Surrogate Physiotherapist (TSP) Dedicated to Quality Enhancement and Cost Reduction in Knee Osteoarthritis Exercise Rehabilitation
1 other identifier
interventional
264
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of the study is to confirm the idea of AI-powered Technological Surrogate Physiotherapist (TSP), by demonstrating its effectiveness and value as a new technology-based contribution to OA healthcare. Participants will be randomized to one of three groups: (1) the conventional PT group receiving the exercise program delivered through in-person sessions; (2) the AI-guided group following the program through the TSP after an initial PT session; or (3) the combined group receiving both in-person PT sessions and AI-guided home exercise. All individuals will take part in the study for 12 weeks, and data will be collected at baseline and 12 weeks after randomization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Oct 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2027
October 7, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.3 years
December 9, 2021
October 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in knee pain as assessed by a 11-point numerical pain rating scale as recommended by the OARSI
0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain.
From baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in physical function as assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) physical function sub-scale
The scale regards the degree of difficulty in performing usual daily activities and higher level activities that involve physical function of the knee. Each item will be rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'None' (i.e., no difficulty) to 'Extreme' (i.e., extreme difficulty), based on which a normalized total score will be calculated (0 indicating extreme symptoms and 100 indicating no symptoms).
From baseline to 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Changes in physical function as assessed by 30-second chair-stand test
From baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in physical function as assessed by timed up-and-go test
From baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in physical function as assessed by maximal isometric strength of the quadriceps and hamstrings
From baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in physical function as assessed by active and passive ranges of motion of the hip and knee joints
From baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in health-related quality of life assessed by the Chinese version of the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
From baseline to 12 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
The AI-powered Technological Surrogate Physiotherapist
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be required to perform three 30-minute exercise sessions per week for 12 weeks, with six exercises at any one time. During the exercise sessions, participants will receiveTechnological Surrogate Physiotherapist (TSP) support which will in particular leverage AI to offer innovative features and modules dedicated to enhancing exercise monitoring and supervision, real-time performance feedback, and self-assessment.
Face-to-face physiotherapist-supervised exercise program
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be required to visit a physiotherapist for usual face-to-face exercise therapy. Also, they will be required to perform three 30-minute home exercise sessions per week for 12 weeks. However, TSP will not be involved in this group.
The AI-powered Technological Surrogate Physiotherapist Plus Face-to-face physiotherapist-supervised
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive an integrated intervention combining conventional physiotherapist-supervised sessions and TSP-supported home exercises (three 30-minute exercise sessions per week for 12 weeks).
Interventions
The AI-powered Technological Surrogate Physiotherapist will have three key features: 1. Evidence-based exercise videos instructed by physical therapists 2. Real-time movement feedback and performance score 3. Exercise records.
Physiotherapists will give usual face-to-face therapy. The assessment of participants' exercise movements will only be achieved in the traditional manner during face-to-face exercise sessions - by physiotherapists' visual inspection of and professional judgement on postural alignment and effectiveness, with verbal instructions for posture correction. The features of real-time movement feedback and tracking of exercise progress will not be provided.
This group will attend in-person group therapy sessions, while additionally completing weekly home exercise sessions using the TSP system.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants will be recruited if they
- age ≥ 50 years,
- report having pain in or around the knee for more than 12 weeks and on most days of the previous month,
- report being diagnosed with knee OA by a physician, have physician-diagnosed knee OA in the medical record, or have radiographic evidence of grade 2 to 3 knee OA on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale in the posteroanterior and/or skyline view or the presence of lateral/posterior osteophytes (the X-rays will be read and classified by our orthopaedic surgeons collaborators to decide on each patient's eligibility to be included in the study),
- are willing and physically and cognitively able to perform (technology-supported) exercises required in the study protocol
- have normal or corrected to normal vision,
- are able to speak and read Chinese,
- are able to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals will be excluded if they have
- history of knee or hip replacement surgery,
- non-ambulatory status,
- systemic inflammatory arthritis (e.g., gout),
- history of trauma (e.g., fractures around the knee, dislocation, and sprains or tears of soft tissues, like ligaments) or surgical arthroscopy of either knee within the past 6 months,
- intra-articular injection to the knee within the past 6 months,
- cognitive impairment,
- involvement in a similar study in the past 6 months,
- recent or imminent surgery (within 12 weeks),
- medical co-morbidities that preclude participation in exercise.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
826, Haking Wong Building, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Hong Kong, 000, Hong Kong
Related Publications (14)
Roberts JM, Wilson K. Effect of stretching duration on active and passive range of motion in the lower extremity. Br J Sports Med. 1999 Aug;33(4):259-63. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.4.259.
PMID: 10450481BACKGROUNDPodsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
PMID: 1991946BACKGROUNDHinman RS, Kimp AJ, Campbell PK, Russell T, Foster NE, Kasza J, Harris A, Bennell KL. Technology versus tradition: a non-inferiority trial comparing video to face-to-face consultations with a physiotherapist for people with knee osteoarthritis. Protocol for the PEAK randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Aug 7;21(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03523-8.
PMID: 32767989BACKGROUNDLam CL, Tse EY, Gandek B, Fong DY. The SF-36 summary scales were valid, reliable, and equivalent in a Chinese population. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;58(8):815-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.008.
PMID: 16018917BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
PMID: 1593914BACKGROUNDDobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, Abbott JH, Stratford P, Davis AM, Buchbinder R, Snyder-Mackler L, Henrotin Y, Thumboo J, Hansen P, Bennell KL. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Aug;21(8):1042-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 13.
PMID: 23680877BACKGROUNDHawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
PMID: 22588748BACKGROUNDMcAlindon TE, Driban JB, Henrotin Y, Hunter DJ, Jiang GL, Skou ST, Wang S, Schnitzer T. OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Design, conduct, and reporting of clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 May;23(5):747-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.005.
PMID: 25952346BACKGROUNDMcAlindon TE, Cooper C, Kirwan JR, Dieppe PA. Knee pain and disability in the community. Br J Rheumatol. 1992 Mar;31(3):189-92. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/31.3.189.
PMID: 1540789BACKGROUNDCottrell E, Roddy E, Foster NE. The attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of GPs regarding exercise for chronic knee pain: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Jan 18;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-4.
PMID: 20082694BACKGROUNDHurley MV, Walsh NE, Mitchell HL, Pimm TJ, Patel A, Williamson E, Jones RH, Dieppe PA, Reeves BC. Clinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain: a cluster randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct 15;57(7):1211-9. doi: 10.1002/art.22995.
PMID: 17907147BACKGROUNDHurley MV, Walsh NE, Mitchell H, Nicholas J, Patel A. Long-term outcomes and costs of an integrated rehabilitation program for chronic knee pain: a pragmatic, cluster randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Feb;64(2):238-47. doi: 10.1002/acr.20642.
PMID: 21954131BACKGROUNDChen T, Or CK, Chen J. Effects of technology-supported exercise programs on the knee pain, physical function, and quality of life of individuals with knee osteoarthritis and/or chronic knee pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):414-423. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa282.
PMID: 33236109BACKGROUNDHay EM, Foster NE, Thomas E, Peat G, Phelan M, Yates HE, Blenkinsopp A, Sim J. Effectiveness of community physiotherapy and enhanced pharmacy review for knee pain in people aged over 55 presenting to primary care: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ. 2006 Nov 11;333(7576):995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38977.590752.0B. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
PMID: 17056608BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2021
First Posted
December 29, 2021
Study Start
October 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Last Updated
October 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share