NCT07391449

Brief Summary

The aim of this trial is to conduct a 12-week randomised controlled trial comparing an HRV-guided home exercise program with traditional home exercise program for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), followed by 24-week assessment. The trial employs a validated HRV sensor and the HRV4Training app to record daily HRV measurements, enabling personalized exercise intensity adjustments. Participants with high HRV are prescribed high-intensity exercises, while those with low HRV undertake low-intensity exercises. In contrast, the traditional exercise group follows a standardised program, progressing from low to high intensity over the 12-week period. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the effect of HRV-guided exercise on pain and functional disability in patients with KOA using validated outcome measures assessed at baseline, 12 weeks (post-intervention), and 24 weeks. Longitudinal semi-structured qualitative interviews at weeks 12 and 24 will explore participants' experiences and perceived barriers to exercise adherence. A mediation analysis will elucidate the physiological mechanisms underlying the efficacy of HRV-guided exercise. Secondary objectives include comparing HRV-guided and traditional home exercise programme in terms of exercise adherence, quality of life, sleep quality, self-efficacy, patient satisfaction, physical performance, balance, muscle strength, and lower limb biomechanics. Exploratory aims involve evaluating long-term effects (up to 24 weeks), examining associations between baseline HRV profiles and key outcomes, and determining the cost-effectiveness of HRV-guided exercise relative to traditional programme. The trial employs a robust methodological design, applying mixed-effects models and an intention-to-treat approach for data analysis.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
37mo left

Started Jan 2027

Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2026

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2027

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2028

1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2029

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

January 29, 2026

Last Update Submit

February 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritisHRVPhysical activityHome exerciseRehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Knee pain

    Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. Higher scores mean more discomfort. The WOMAC pain subscale include five items for pain (scores range from 0 to 20).

    change from pre- to post-treatment (12 weeks)

  • Physical Function

    Assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale. Higher scores mean more difficulty with daily tasks. The WOMAC function subscale include 17 items for functional restriction (scores range from 0 to 68).

    Change from pre- to post-treatment (12 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Healthcare resource utilisation

    week 12 and week 24

  • Quality adjusted life year (QALY)

    week 12 and week 24

  • Knee pain

    changes from baseline to week 24

  • Physical function

    changes from baseline to week 24

  • Arthritis self-efficacy scale (ASES)

    Baseline, week 12, week 24

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • System Usability Scale (SUS)

    week 12

Study Arms (2)

HRV guided home exercise

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: HRV-guided home exercise prescription

Traditional home exercise

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Traditional Home Exercise

Interventions

Participants in this group will follow the same exercise structure as the traditional home exercise group; however, their exercise program will be individualised according to daily HRV profiles. Exercise sessions will be performed three times per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). All participants will conduct HRV measurements, starting one week before the intervention and continuing until its completion. HRV will be measured each morning immediately after awakening and bladder voiding, with participants remaining in the supine position for 5 minutes. The validated smartphone application, "HRV4Training" (http://www.hrv4training.com/) will be used to record HRV data \[31\]. The analysis provides the root mean square of successive differences between R-R intervals (root mean square successive differences \[rMSSD\]), derived via photoplethysmography. A 7-day rolling average (Ln rMSSD7d) will be computed, and HRV parameters will be calculated.

HRV guided home exercise

Participants in this group will measure their HRV daily as described in the next section; however, these HRV measurements will not be used to guide their exercise prescription. Instead, participants will follow a standardized home exercise programme, conducted three sessions per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). Each session will include a 5-10-minute warm-up, a main exercise component comprising aerobic, strengthening, and stretching exercises (e.g., stretching of lower extremity muscles including knee extensors, knee flexors, and calf), and a 5-minute cooldown \[27-29\]. The warm-up phase will comprise mobility exercises designed to activate the lower extremity muscles, particularly the quadriceps and hamstrings, while the cool-down will incorporate stretching the muscle groups engaged during the session.

Traditional home exercise

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants will include adults aged 45 years and older with symptomatic KOA, diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology Clinical Criteria for the Classification and Reporting of KOA.
  • Mild to moderate KOA (Kellgren Lawrence grade ≤ grade III),
  • a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2, and
  • an average knee pain intensity ≥ 3 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale during the past week.

You may not qualify if:

  • presence of neurological disorders;
  • nonambulatory status;
  • implanted electrical devices;
  • systemic inflammatory arthritis (e.g., gout);
  • significant cognitive impairment;
  • prior hip or knee arthroplasty;
  • history of trauma or surgical arthroscopy of either knee within the past six months;
  • participation in a similar study within the past six months;
  • engagement in an exercise programme within the past six months;
  • receipt of knee intra-articular injection within the past three months;
  • current anticoagulant therapy;
  • recent or planned surgery within three months; and
  • any medical comorbidities precluding safe participation in exercise.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Kowloon, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (36)

  • 37. Saldaña J. Longitudinal qualitative research: analyzing change through time. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2003 May 16.

    BACKGROUND
  • 36. Plano Clark VL, Schumacher K, West C, Edrington J, Dunn LB, Harzstark A, Melisko M, Rabow MW, Swift PS, Miaskowski C. Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2013 Jul;7(3):219-42.

    BACKGROUND
  • 35. Winser SJ, Pang M, Whitney S, Chan AY, Chen C. Cost and effectiveness of Dual-task training on balance and fall risk in individuals with cerebellar ataxia: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2024 Jun 1;123:e113.

    BACKGROUND
  • 34. LaFlair GT, Egbert J, Plonsky L. A practical guide to bootstrapping descriptive statistics, correlations, t tests, and ANOVAs. Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. 2015 Jul 3;46.

    BACKGROUND
  • 33. Lewis JR. The system usability scale: past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2018 Jul 3;34(7):577-90.

    BACKGROUND
  • 32. Vesterinen V, Häkkinen K, Laine T, Hynynen E, Mikkola J, Nummela A. Predictors of individual adaptation to high-volume or high-intensity endurance training in recreational endurance runners. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2016 Aug;26(8):885-93.

    BACKGROUND
  • 31. Plews DJ, Scott B, Altini M, Wood M, Kilding AE, Laursen PB. Comparison of heart-rate-variability recording with smartphone photoplethysmography, polar H7 chest strap, and electrocardiography. International journal of sports physiology and performance. 2017 Nov 1;12(10):1324-8.

    BACKGROUND
  • 30. Williams N. The Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale. Occupational medicine. 2017 Jul 1;67(5):404-5.

    BACKGROUND
  • 29. Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Sarkar B, Paul AK, Anwar D. Effect of 6-week retro or forward walking program on pain, functional disability, quadriceps muscle strength, and performance in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial (retro-walking trial). BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2019 Apr 9;20(1):159.

    BACKGROUND
  • 28. Anwer S, Alghadir A, Brismee JM. Effect of home exercise program in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of geriatric physical therapy. 2016 Jan 1;39(1):38-48.

    BACKGROUND
  • 27. Anwer S, Alghadir A. Effect of isometric quadriceps exercise on muscle strength, pain, and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study. Journal of physical therapy science. 2014;26(5):745-8.

    BACKGROUND
  • 26. Fritz MS, MacKinnon DP. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological science. 2007 Mar;18(3):233-9. 27. Anwer S, Alghadir A. Effect of isometric quadriceps exercise on muscle strength, pain, and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study. Journal of physical therapy science. 2014;26(5):745-8.

    BACKGROUND
  • 25. Rizvi MR, Sharma A, Hasan S, Ahmad F, Asad MR, Iqbal A, Alghadir AH. Exploring the impact of integrated polyvagal exercises and knee reinforcement in females with grade II knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports. 2023 Nov 3;13(1):18964.

    BACKGROUND
  • 24. Williams A, van Dongen JM, Kamper SJ, O'Brien KM, Wolfenden L, Yoong SL, Hodder RK, Lee H, Robson EK, Haskins R, Rissel C. Economic evaluation of a healthy lifestyle intervention for chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Pain. 2019 Mar;23(3):621-34.

    BACKGROUND
  • 23. Jackson D, McCrone P, Mosweu I, Siegert R, Turner-Stokes L. Service use and costs for people with long-term neurological conditions in the first year following discharge from in-patient neuro-rehabilitation: a longitudinal cohort study. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e113056.

    BACKGROUND
  • 22. Joudeh AA, Alghadir AH, Zafar H, Elwatidy SM, Tse C, Anwer S. Effect of quadriceps and calf muscles fatigue on standing balance in healthy young adult males. Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions. 2018 Jun;18(2):248.

    BACKGROUND
  • 21. Sun J, Liu Y, Yan S, Cao G, Wang S, Lester DK, Zhang K. Clinical gait evaluation of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Gait & posture. 2017 Oct 1;58:319-24.

    BACKGROUND
  • 20. Dobson F, Bennell KL, Hinman RS, Abbott JH, Roos EM. Recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. OARSI 2013. https://oarsi.org/sites/oarsi/files/docs/2013/manual.pdf. Accessed 2 October 2025.

    BACKGROUND
  • 19. Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiotherapy Canada. 1995 Oct;47(4):258-63.

    BACKGROUND
  • 17. Tsai PS, Wang SY, Wang MY, Su CT, Yang TT, Huang CJ, Fang SC. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (CPSQI) in primary insomnia and control subjects. Quality of Life Research. 2005 Oct;14(8):1943-52.

    BACKGROUND
  • 16. Brand E, Nyland J, Henzman C, Mcginnis M. Arthritis self-efficacy scale scores in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthritis self-management education with or without exercise. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2013 Dec;43(12):895-910.

    BACKGROUND
  • 15. Myers BJ. Isokinetic testing of muscle strength in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: an integrative review. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 2020 Aug;28(3):269-90.

    BACKGROUND
  • 14. Marriott KA, Hall M, Maciukiewicz JM, Almaw RD, Wiebenga EG, Ivanochko NK, Rinaldi D, Tung EV, Bennell KL, Maly MR. Are the effects of resistance exercise on pain and function in knee and hip osteoarthritis dependent on exercise volume, duration, and adherence? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2024 Jun;76(6):821-30.

    BACKGROUND
  • 13. Rodrigues JA, Santos BC, Medeiros LH, Gonçalves TC, Júnior CR. Effects of different periodization strategies of combined aerobic and strength training on heart rate variability in older women. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2021 Jul 1;35(7):2033-9.

    BACKGROUND
  • 12. Symonds T, Hughes B, Liao S, Ang Q, Bellamy N. Validation of the Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index in patients from mainland China with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis care & research. 2015 Nov;67(11):1553-60.

    BACKGROUND
  • 11. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb SE. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Bmj. 2014 Mar 7;348.

    BACKGROUND
  • 10. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hróbjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleža-Jerić K. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. Bmj. 2013 Jan 9;346.

    BACKGROUND
  • 9. Morinaga H, Takai Y. Heart rate variability-guided aerobic training without moderate-intensity enhances submaximal and maximal aerobic power with less training load. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2025;20(1):366-80.

    BACKGROUND
  • 8. Düking P, Zinner C, Trabelsi K, Reed JL, Holmberg HC, Kunz P, Sperlich B. Monitoring and adapting endurance training on the basis of heart rate variability monitored by wearable technologies: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2021 Nov 1;24(11):1180-92.

    BACKGROUND
  • 7. Carrasco-Poyatos M, Granero-Gallegos A, López-García GD, López-Osca R. HRV-guided training for elders after stroke: a protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022 Aug 31;19(17):10868.

    BACKGROUND
  • 6. Ortigosa-Márquez JM, Reigal RE, Portell M, Morales-Sánchez V, Hernández-Mendo A. Observación automatizada: La variabilidad de la frecuencia cardíaca y su relación con las variables psicológicas determinantes del rendimiento en nadadores jóvenes. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology. 2017 Jul 21;33(3):436-41.

    BACKGROUND
  • 5. Hawker GA. Osteoarthritis is a serious disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep 1;37(Suppl 120):3-6.

    BACKGROUND
  • 4. The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Osteoarthritis in Hong Kong Chinese-prevalence, aetiology and prevention. 2001. Available from: http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ipro/010306e.htm. Accessed 07 Oct 2025.

    BACKGROUND
  • 3. Liu Q, Wang S, Lin J, Zhang Y. The burden for knee osteoarthritis among Chinese elderly: estimates from a nationally representative study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage. 2018 Dec 1;26(12):1636-42.

    BACKGROUND
  • 2. Steinmetz JD, Culbreth GT, Haile LM, Rafferty Q, Lo J, Fukutaki KG, Cruz JA, Smith AE, Vollset SE, Brooks PM, Cross M. Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990-2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Rheumatology. 2023 Sep 1;5(9):e508-22.

    BACKGROUND
  • 1. Fransen M, McConnell S, Harmer AR, Van der Esch M, Simic M, Bennell KL. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane systematic review. British journal of sports medicine. 2015 Dec 1;49(24):1554-7.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesBehavior

Study Officials

  • Shanawaz Anwer, PhD

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2026

First Posted

February 5, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymised individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publication(s).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Beginning 6 months and ending 36 months following publication(s).
Access Criteria
Data will only be available for individual participant data. Data will be disseminated to researchers who submit a methodologically rigorous proposal and whose intended usage of the data has received approval from an independent review committee designated for this purpose.

Locations