Group Drum-Based Music Therapy Intervention for Parkinson's Disease/Huntington's Disease
Drum-PD/HD: The Impact of Group Drum-Based Music Therapy Intervention on Quality of Life and Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease and Huntington's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Participants in this study (18-89 years) with Parkinson's disease or Huntington's disease receive drum classes twice a week for 12 weeks (24 lessons). All participants also participate in study visits for assessments before the beginning of the study, at the 6 week mark, at the 12 week mark and at the 18 week mark so that the investigators can assess the short and long term effects of drum classes on hand dexterity, upper extremity function and well-being.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2021
CompletedDecember 30, 2025
December 1, 2025
5 months
December 1, 2021
December 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Changes in score on anxiety level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner)
Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For anxiety domain, unpleasant thoughts and/or feelings related to fear (e.g., fearfulness, feelings of panic), helplessness, worry and hyperarousal (e.g., tension, nervousness, restlessness) are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) \*High scores indicate worse (undesirable) self-reported health.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on depression level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner)
Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For depression domain, experience of loss and feelings of hopelessness, negative mood (e.g., sadness, guilt), decrease in positive affect (e.g., loss of interest), information-processing deficits (e.g., problems in decision-making), negative views of the self (e.g., self-criticism, worthlessness), and negative social cognition (e.g., loneliness) are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) \*High scores indicate worse (undesirable) self-reported health.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on upper extremity performance level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner)
Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For upper extremity domain, one's ability to carry out various activities involving digital, manual and reach-related functions, ranging from fine motor to self-care (activities of daily living) are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) \*High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on lower extremity performance level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner)
Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For lower extremity domain, one's ability to carry out various activities involving the trunk region and increasing degrees of bodily movement, ambulation, balance, or endurance are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) \*High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on ability to participate in social roles and activities as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner)
Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For the ability to participate in social roles and activities domain, degree of involvement in one's usual social roles, activities and responsibilities, including work, family, friends, and leisure are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) \*High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on satisfaction with social roles and activities as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner)
Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For the satisfaction with social roles and activities domain, satisfaction with involvement in one's usual social roles, activities and responsibilities, including work, family, friends, and leisure are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) \*High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on positive affect and well-being level as assessed by Neuro-QoL (patients and study partner)
Neuro-QoL is a set of self-report measures that assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and with neurological disorders including PD and HD. For positive affect and well-being domain, aspects of a person's life that relate to a sense of well-being, life satisfaction or an overall sense of purpose and meaning are measured. All Neuro-QoL items employ five response options (e.g., 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much) \*High scores indicate better (desirable) self-reported health.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on burden level as assessed by the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) (study partner)
The Zarit Burden Interview, a popular caregiver self-report measure used by many aging agencies, originated as a 29-item questionnaire. The 29-item instrument is included in Zarit et al., 1980. The revised version contains 22 items. This study used 22 items. It is scored as either (0) never, (1) rarely, (2) sometimes, (3) quite frequently, or (4) nearly always. Items are then summed and total scores are interpreted as follows: 0 to 21 little or no burden, 21 to 40 mild to moderate burden, 41 to 60 moderate to severe burden, and 61 to 88 severe burden.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Changes in score on cognitive impairment level as assessed by the MoCA (patients)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Change in score on depression level as assessed by the BDI-II (patients and study partner)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on the daily living level as assessed by Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) (patients)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on patient health level as assessed by the short form (SF)-36 (patients and study partner)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
Changes in score on apathy level as assessed by Apathy Evaluation Scale (patients)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Parkinson's Disease (PD) Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with PD and their caregivers receive group drum classes twice a week for 12 weeks (24 lessons).
Huntington's Disease (HD) Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with HD and their caregivers receive group drum classes twice a week for 12 weeks (24 lessons).
Interventions
All 24 Armstrong Rhythm Cycleâ„¢ sessions is conducted in a circle to ensure maximum line of sight for each participant. A variety of diverse percussion instruments ranging from hand drums, stick drums, shakers, and rhythm sticks are available as well as adaptive measures to address limited physical functioning. Instrument choice is dependent on ease of use for the level of the physical ability, skill development needs, and personal choice. Participants are informed that the participants free to use the same instrument for the duration of each session or to switch instruments at any time. Utilizing the five components of The Armstrong Rhythm Method, this protocol guides participants through three phases to achieve rhythmic skill development and group cohesion for therapeutic benefit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Huntington's Disease (HD)
- Ability to give written consent
- Age 18-90
- Clinical diagnosis of probable of clinically established Parkinson disease; or Huntington disease confirmed by genetic testing (greater than or equal to 36 CAG repeats)
- Ability to move hands, wrists and arms safely for instrument play
- Presence of study partner who is available for all drum lessons and study assessments
- Study Partners:
- Ability to give written consent
- Ability to give written consent
- Age 18-90
- Ability to move hands, wrists and arms safely for instrument play
You may not qualify if:
- PD: Hoehn \& Yahr Stage 5 disease; Schwab \& England score 40% or lower
- HD: Total Functional Capacity scores between 5 and 13 inclusive
- Co-morbid diagnosis (broken bones, sprains, severe arthritis, conditions involving paresis) in the judgement of the patient's treating physician that may preclude participant's full ability to participate in the intervention group.
- MoCA scores \<17
- Active psychosis or other condition affecting the participants' ability to safely cooperate with study procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Related Publications (10)
Pantelyat A, Syres C, Reichwein S, Willis A. DRUM-PD: The use of a drum circle to improve the symptoms and signs of Parkinson's disease (PD). Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016 May-Jun;3(3):243-249. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12269. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
PMID: 27340683BACKGROUNDNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). User Manual for the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Measures, Version 2.0, March 2015.
BACKGROUNDZarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.6.649. No abstract available.
PMID: 7203086BACKGROUNDGoetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N; Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70. doi: 10.1002/mds.22340.
PMID: 19025984BACKGROUNDPeto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Greenhall R. The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson's disease. Qual Life Res. 1995 Jun;4(3):241-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02260863.
PMID: 7613534BACKGROUNDBeck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the beck depression inventory-II.1996
BACKGROUNDMarin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale. Psychiatry Res. 1991 Aug;38(2):143-62. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(91)90040-v.
PMID: 1754629BACKGROUNDMcRae C, Diem G, Vo A, O'Brien C, Seeberger L. Reliability of measurements of patient health status: a comparison of physician, patient, and caregiver ratings. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2002 Jan;8(3):187-92. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(01)00009-8.
PMID: 12039430BACKGROUNDNasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
PMID: 15817019BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
PMID: 1593914BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexander Pantelyat
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2021
First Posted
December 14, 2021
Study Start
January 9, 2019
Primary Completion
June 10, 2019
Study Completion
June 10, 2019
Last Updated
December 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share