NCT05142683

Brief Summary

This a stepped wedged cluster RCT with two intervention arms--Treatment As Usual (TAU) and an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP). Eligible participants are between the ages of 13 and 18, who present to community mental health agencies with depressive symptoms as the primary concern. The primary objective is to establish the clinical effectiveness of the ICP intervention in the community setting relative to TAU, with respect to reducing evaluator-rated depressive symptoms. The secondary objectives are to explore changes in clinician-rated function and caregiver-rated symptoms for youth receiving the ICP intervention relative to TAU. The third objective is to explore the implementation effectiveness of the ICP intervention, namely investigating: feasibility, fidelity, cost and acceptability. Edited on March 7th, 2024: This is a quasi-experimental, multi-site cluster controlled clinical trial design with two intervention arms--Treatment As Usual (TAU) and an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP). Eligible participants are between the ages of 13 and 18, who present to community mental health agencies with depressive symptoms as the primary concern. The primary objective is to establish the clinical effectiveness of the ICP intervention in the community setting relative to TAU, with respect to reducing evaluator-rated depressive symptoms. The secondary objectives are to explore changes in clinician-rated function and caregiver-rated symptoms for youth receiving the ICP intervention relative to TAU. The third objective is to explore the implementation effectiveness of the ICP intervention in the community setting, namely investigating: feasibility, fidelity, cost and acceptability.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder

Timeline
17mo left

Started Feb 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress76%
Feb 2022Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 2, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2022

Completed
5.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2027

Last Updated

March 22, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5.7 years

First QC Date

November 3, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

AdolescentsIntegrated Care PathwayDepressionMeasurement Based CareImplementation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Childhood Depression Rating Scale-Revised

    A 17-item measure rated by an RA following a semi-structured interview with the adolescent relating to symptoms of depression over the past 2 weeks. The RA will be blind to treatment assignment.

    Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale

    Change from baseline to 24 weeks

  • Depression Rating Scale

    Change from baseline to 24 weeks

  • Youth Quality of Life Scale Research Version

    Change from baseline to 24 weeks

  • Health and Social Service Utilization

    Change from baseline to 24 weeks

  • Ontario Perception of Care Tool for Mental Health and Addictions

    Change from baseline to 24 weeks

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Treatment as Usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study involvement for all sites will begin in the TAU condition, which is the typical treatment at the participating community mental health agency. A range of treatments observed in our previous survey of sites will be on offer in these agencies, depending on the preferences and context of the local agency. In typical TAU in community mental health agencies, depressive symptoms and function are not systematically monitored via standardized rating scales. TAU may or may not include referral to psychotherapy and/or parent support. There are no prompts to prescribe specific medications, and/or internal and external referrals to treatment and other services, guided by local service standards.

Other: Treatment As Usual

CARIBOU-2

EXPERIMENTAL

After the CARIBOU-1 pilot study, the Principal Investigator revised the ICP to render it more applicable to community settings as well as offer a second-line psychotherapy ("Brief Psychosocial Intervention") for youth who do not engage with, or respond to, cognitive-behavioural therapy. The revised version is called the CARIBOU-2 intervention. The current iteration of the pathway involves a series of steps: (1) structured assessment, including safety assessment; (2) education on depression, sleep, exercise, and diet; (3) psychotherapy (with 1st line Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, 2nd line "Brief Psychosocial Intervention"); (4) a caregiver structured support group; (5) medication options (1st line fluoxetine, 2nd line sertraline); (6) "team reviews" every four weeks, (meeting with the youth and involved clinicians to review measures and discuss treatment changes); and, (7) discharge and follow-up planning.

Other: CARIBOU-2

Interventions

Various typical interventions for adolescents with depression.

Treatment as Usual

Integrated Care Pathway intervention for adolescents with depression.

CARIBOU-2

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Youth is aged 13 to 18 years, inclusive.
  • Youth and/or their caregiver is expressing that 'depression" (or some synonym) is a concern.
  • Clinician agrees that depressive symptoms are a treatment target.
  • Mood and Feelings Questionnaire score is ≥22 at two sequential visits (screening and baseline assessment).
  • Youth must be new to the site (in past 3 months) or have a period of no treatment for 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Known or highly suspected presentations of psychotic symptoms that are persistent, affect functioning, and have observable effects on behaviour.
  • Severe substance use disorder, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disability, severe eating disorder, imminent risk of suicide requiring hospitalization as per judgment of the assessing clinician.
  • Inability to provide informed consent to the study for any reason
  • Youth currently in Day Treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Bennett K, Courtney D, Duda S, Henderson J, Szatmari P. An appraisal of the trustworthiness of practice guidelines for depression and anxiety in children and youth. Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jun;35(6):530-540. doi: 10.1002/da.22752. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

    PMID: 29697887BACKGROUND
  • Courtney D, Bennett K, Henderson J, Darnay K, Battaglia M, Strauss J, Watson P, Szatmari P. A Way through the woods: Development of an integrated care pathway for adolescents with depression. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;14(4):486-494. doi: 10.1111/eip.12918. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

    PMID: 31883210BACKGROUND
  • Courtney DB, Bennett K, Szatmari P. The Forest and the Trees: Evidence-Based Medicine in the Age of Information. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;58(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.035.

    PMID: 30577942BACKGROUND
  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.

    PMID: 22310560BACKGROUND
  • Hytman L, Mansueto S, Chan JI, Kumar R, Nguyen ATP, Wang W, Krause KR, Monga S, Szatmari P, Courtney DB. Interrater Reliability and Measurement Error of the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised in Adolescents. JAACAP Open. 2025 Jun 20;3(4):1225-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.06.005. eCollection 2025 Dec.

  • de Oliveira C, Mason J, Amani B, Liddell G, Szatmari P, Henderson J, Courtney D. Protocol for the economic evaluation of the Care for Adolescents who Received Information 'Bout Outcomes, 2nd iteration (CARIBOU-2) non-randomised, cluster-controlled trial of an integrated care pathway for depression in adolescents. BMJ Open. 2025 May 15;15(5):e092541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092541.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, MajorDepression

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Darren B Courtney, MD

    University of Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Michelle U Ferreira, MEd

CONTACT

Bahar Amani, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The evaluator of the primary outcome will be blind to treatment arm as well as blind to the stepped wedge design. Edited March 7th, 2024: The evaluator of the primary outcome will be blind to treatment arm as well as blind to the quasi-experimental cluster controlled design.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: The study uses a Type 1 Hybrid Implementation Effectiveness design that focuses on the effectiveness of the clinical intervention (ICP) while exploring the implementation effectiveness of the intervention. A stepped wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial is indicated as the intervention is applied at the clinic level. Edited on March 7th, 2024: The study uses a Type 1 Hybrid Implementation Effectiveness design that focuses on the effectiveness of the clinical intervention (ICP) while exploring the implementation effectiveness of the intervention. A cluster controlled trial is indicated as the intervention is applied at the clinic-level.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2021

First Posted

December 2, 2021

Study Start

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Last Updated

March 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations