Feasibility of Home Instillation of UGN-102 for Treatment of Low-Grade (LG) Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)
A Phase 3b, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Assess the Feasibility of Home Instillation of UGN-102 for Treatment of Patients With Low-Grade (LG) Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) at Intermediate-Risk (IR) of Recurrence
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This study aims to demonstrate that home instillation of UGN-102 is a feasible alternative to instillation in a clinical setting, which might mitigate patient challenges (logistical, expense, and comfort) when receiving treatment for low-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (LG-IR-NMIBC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.2 years
September 23, 2021
August 12, 2024
September 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation, and TEAEs of Special Interest.
The number of patients with each type of event will be summarized. TEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the day of the first instillation of UGN-102 or pre-treatment AEs that worsened during the study.
Up to 3 months
Number of Participants With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values
PCS laboratory criteria were defined for the following parameters: Hematology * Hemoglobin \< 0.8 × lower limit of normal and \> 20% decrease from baseline or \> 1.3 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and \> 30% increase from baseline. * Leukocytes ≤ 2.8 or ≥ 16 × 10\^3/µL. * Lymphocytes \< 0.5 or \> 20 × 10\^3/µL. * Neutrophils \< 1.0 × 10\^3/µL. * Platelets \< 75 or ≥ 700 × 10\^3/µL. Chemistry * Creatinine \> 2.2 mg/dL. * Sodium ≤ 130 or \> 150 mEq/L. * Potassium \< 3.0 or \> 5.5 mEq/L. * Total bilirubin \> 1.5 × ULN. * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 3 × ULN. * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 3 × ULN. * Gamma glutamyl transferase \> 2.5 × ULN.
Up to 3 months
Composite Score for the Post-instillation Patient Questionnaire
Patients were asked to rate their experience receiving UGN-102 at home after each instillation was completed. A total of 5 domains (8 questions) were assessed: * Comfort (3 questions, possible range from 3 "least favorable" to 12 "most favorable"). * Safety/concerns (1 question, possible range from 1 "least favorable" to 4 "most favorable"). * Communication (2 questions, possible range from 2 "least favorable" to 8 "most favorable"). * Preference compared to office instillation (1 question, possible range from 1 "least favorable" to 4 "most favorable"). * Overall experience/satisfaction (1 question, possible range from 1 "least favorable" to 4 "most favorable"). A composite score (sum of all 8 question scores) was also calculated (possible range from 8 "least favorable" to 32 "most favorable").
Up to 5 weeks
Responses to the Post-instillation Home Health Professional Questionnaire
Home health professionals (HHPs) were asked to share their experience administering UGN-102 at the patient's home after each instillation was completed. A total of 4 domains (4 questions) were assessed: * Comfort - Were you comfortable performing the instillation at this patient's home, yes (most favorable) or no (least favorable)? * Difficulty - Was it difficult to perform the instillation at this patient's home, yes (least favorable) or no (most favorable)? * Safety/concerns - Did you have any concerns performing the instillation in the home setting, yes (least favorable) or no (most favorable)? * Adequate support - Did you have sufficient support performing the instillation in the home setting, yes (most favorable) or no (least favorable)? The number of patients whose HHP had a "most favorable" response to all 4 questions is summarized for each home instillation.
Up to 5 weeks
Responses to End of Study Patient and Investigator Questionnaires
Patient recommendations regarding home instillation of UGN-102 were collected at the 3-month Visit or Early Termination Visit. Two questions were asked: * Will you recommend home instillations of UGN-102 for other patients with NMIBC, yes (most favorable) or no (least favorable)? * Will you recommend home instillations of UGN-102 instead of having transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for other patients with NMIBC, yes (most favorable) or no (least favorable)? The number of patients who had a "most favorable" response is summarized by question. In addition, investigators were asked if the experience of having their patient receive instillations at home was less difficult (most favorable), more difficult (least favorable), or not different than having them receive instillations in the office. All responses are summarized.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
3 months
Study Arms (1)
UGN-102
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive 6 once-weekly intravesical instillations of UGN-102 (75 mg mitomycin). Treatment Visit 1 will occur at the investigative site and instillation will be performed by a qualified physician. Treatment Visits 2 to 6 will occur at the patient's home and instillation will be performed by a properly trained and qualified home health professional.
Interventions
UGN-102 consists of mitomycin and sterile hydrogel (a proprietary thermally responsive gel) that is used to reconstitute mitomycin before instillation. The reverse thermal properties of UGN-102 allow for local administration of mitomycin as a liquid under chilled conditions, with subsequent conversion to a semi-solid gel depot following instillation into the bladder.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Capable of giving written informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form and the protocol.
- Patient who has newly diagnosed or historic LG-NMIBC (Ta) histologically confirmed by cold cup biopsy at Screening or within 8 weeks before Screening.
- Has IR disease, defined as having 1 or 2 of the following:
- Presence of multiple tumors.
- Solitary tumor \> 3 cm.
- Recurrence (≥ 1 occurrence of LG-NMIBC within 1 year of the current diagnosis at the initial Screening Visit).
- Negative voiding cytology for HG disease within 6 weeks before Screening.
- Has adequate organ and bone marrow function as determined by routine laboratory tests:
- Leukocytes ≥ 3,000/μL (≥ 3 × 10\^9/L).
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/μL (≥ 1.5 × 10\^9/L).
- Platelets ≥ 100,000/μL (≥ 100 × 10\^9/L).
- Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL.
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN.
- AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 × ULN.
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 × ULN.
- +5 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment for urothelial carcinoma (UC) within previous 1 year.
- History of HG bladder cancer (papillary or carcinoma in situ) in the past 2 years.
- Known allergy or sensitivity to mitomycin that in the investigator's opinion cannot be readily managed.
- Clinically significant urethral stricture that would preclude passage of a urethral catheter.
- History of:
- Neurogenic bladder.
- Active urinary retention.
- Any other condition that would prohibit normal voiding.
- Past or current T1 UC, muscle invasive UC (ie, T2, T3, T4), metastatic UC, or concurrent upper tract UC.
- Has an underlying substance abuse or psychiatric disorder such that, in the opinion of the investigator, the patient would be unable to comply with the protocol.
- History of prior treatment with an intravesical chemotherapeutic agent in the past 2 years except for a single dose of chemotherapy immediately after any previous TURBT.
- Has participated in a study with an investigational agent or device within 30 days of enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Urology Centers of Alabama (UCA)
Homewood, Alabama, 35209, United States
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Medication Management
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408, United States
Urology Associates, P.C.
Nashville, Tennessee, 37209, United States
Virginia Urology
Richmond, Virginia, 23235, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Clinical Development
- Organization
- UroGen Pharma
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sunil Raju, MBBS
UroGen Pharma
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2021
First Posted
November 30, 2021
Study Start
November 30, 2021
Primary Completion
February 2, 2023
Study Completion
February 2, 2023
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Results First Posted
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09