NCT05129514

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a course of daily manual lymphatic drainage over the course of 5 days can improve lymphatic drainage function and cognitive outcomes and to determine whether single sessions of manual lymphatic drainage improves lymphatic drainage in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 9, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 22, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 18, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 22, 2022

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

November 9, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

traumatic brain injurylymphatic drainagecerebrospinal fluid

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • change in Near-Infrared Fluorescence Lymphatic Imaging (NIRF-LI) assessment of lymphatic drainage

    2 NIRF-LI sessions will be conducted separated by 3 days.

    day 1, day 5

  • change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Global health( GH) scale

    Nine of the 10 PROMIS GH items are scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the best health. Pain which is the 10th question is scored from 0(no pain) to 10(worst imaginable pain).

    day1,day2,day3,day4,day5

  • change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    This scale consists of a set of 9 questions each scored form 0(not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Total score ranges form 0-27.

    day1,day2,day3,day4,day5

  • change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Multilingual Aphasia Examination III-Controlled Oral Word Association

    This is used to asses phonemic fluency. Participant is asked to name words that begin with a particular letter in one minute and examiner will write down the words said by the participant. This will be reported y the number of words participants say in one minute

    day1,day2,day3,day4,day5

  • change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Trail Making Test(TMT)

    Scores are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment.

    day1,day2,day3,day4,day5

  • change in cognitive test results as assessed by the learning trial

    This will be assessed by the number of words participants can remember

    day1,day2,day3,day4,day5

  • change in cognitive test results as assessed by the delayed recall trial instructions

    This will be assessed by the number of words participants can remember after 20-25 minutes delay

    day1,day2,day3,day4,day5

  • change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Semantic Category learning trial

    There are 12 words that participants will categories as Four-legged Animals, precious stones and human dwellings for a total score from 0-12 a higher number indicates a better outcome

    day1,day2,day3,day4,day5

  • Change in processing speed, as assessed by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -IV

    Two subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - IV are used (Coding and Symbol Search). Age-adjusted standard scores are calculated for each of subtest. The 2 subtest scores are then combined to create the Processing Speed Index. Processing Speed Index will be reported as a percentile (0% to 100%), with a higher percentile indicating a better outcome

    day1,day2,day3,day4,day5

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in NIRF-LI detected lymphatic drainage

    day1,day5

Study Arms (1)

Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD)

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD)

Interventions

The participant will be placed in a supine position and manual lymphatic drainage will be performed for 50 minutes. During the three intervening days, daily 50 minute sessions of manual lymphatic drainage will be provided.

Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female participants must complete the Female Enrollment Form. Those subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy within 36 hours of study drug administration and also agree to use one of the medically accepted methods of contraception listed on the form for a period of one month following the study. Female subjects of non-childbearing potential, defined as physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, must meet the criteria listed on the Female Enrollment form, but are not restricted to the use of contraception following study participation.
  • Participants must be able to sit upright for periods of 30 minutes.
  • Participants should have a body mass index between 19 and 30 kg/m2
  • Initial post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score following blunt head trauma of 3 to 12 or coma (not due to sedation) greater than 6 hours. Emergence from Post-traumatic Amnesia as documented by serial administration of the Orientation-Log or Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test
  • Have an anticipated hospital length of stay of 5 days or more following screening and consent.
  • Able to provide consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Persons who are known to be allergic to iodine
  • Persons who have extensive soft tissue damage to the neck region, including carotid artery dissection, spinal cord injury, or other conditions, that makes lymphatic drainage techniques undesirable.
  • Women who are of child bearing potential who do not agree to use medically acceptable contraceptives for one month following the study.
  • Subjects who are participating in another interventional trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, TraumaticNeuroinflammatory Diseases

Interventions

Manual Lymphatic Drainage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MassageTherapy, Soft TissueMusculoskeletal ManipulationsComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsDrainagePhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Eva Sevick, PhD

    The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2021

First Posted

November 22, 2021

Study Start

May 18, 2022

Primary Completion

July 22, 2022

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

March 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations