Study Stopped
Low recruitment and end of funding for study.
Imaging Lymphatic/Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Drainage From the Head and Neck in Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury: Demonstration of Feasibility and Evaluation of Manual Therapy to Improve Drainage and Facilitate Cognitive Recovery
Imaging Lymphatic/CSF Drainage From the Head and Neck in Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury: Demonstration of Feasibility and Evaluation of Manual Therapy to Improve Drainage and Facilitate Cognitive Recovery
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a course of daily manual lymphatic drainage over the course of 5 days can improve lymphatic drainage function and cognitive outcomes and to determine whether single sessions of manual lymphatic drainage improves lymphatic drainage in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedMarch 10, 2026
May 1, 2023
2 months
November 9, 2021
March 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
change in Near-Infrared Fluorescence Lymphatic Imaging (NIRF-LI) assessment of lymphatic drainage
2 NIRF-LI sessions will be conducted separated by 3 days.
day 1, day 5
change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Global health( GH) scale
Nine of the 10 PROMIS GH items are scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the best health. Pain which is the 10th question is scored from 0(no pain) to 10(worst imaginable pain).
day1,day2,day3,day4,day5
change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
This scale consists of a set of 9 questions each scored form 0(not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Total score ranges form 0-27.
day1,day2,day3,day4,day5
change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Multilingual Aphasia Examination III-Controlled Oral Word Association
This is used to asses phonemic fluency. Participant is asked to name words that begin with a particular letter in one minute and examiner will write down the words said by the participant. This will be reported y the number of words participants say in one minute
day1,day2,day3,day4,day5
change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Trail Making Test(TMT)
Scores are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment.
day1,day2,day3,day4,day5
change in cognitive test results as assessed by the learning trial
This will be assessed by the number of words participants can remember
day1,day2,day3,day4,day5
change in cognitive test results as assessed by the delayed recall trial instructions
This will be assessed by the number of words participants can remember after 20-25 minutes delay
day1,day2,day3,day4,day5
change in cognitive test results as assessed by the Semantic Category learning trial
There are 12 words that participants will categories as Four-legged Animals, precious stones and human dwellings for a total score from 0-12 a higher number indicates a better outcome
day1,day2,day3,day4,day5
Change in processing speed, as assessed by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -IV
Two subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - IV are used (Coding and Symbol Search). Age-adjusted standard scores are calculated for each of subtest. The 2 subtest scores are then combined to create the Processing Speed Index. Processing Speed Index will be reported as a percentile (0% to 100%), with a higher percentile indicating a better outcome
day1,day2,day3,day4,day5
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in NIRF-LI detected lymphatic drainage
day1,day5
Study Arms (1)
Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD)
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The participant will be placed in a supine position and manual lymphatic drainage will be performed for 50 minutes. During the three intervening days, daily 50 minute sessions of manual lymphatic drainage will be provided.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female participants must complete the Female Enrollment Form. Those subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy within 36 hours of study drug administration and also agree to use one of the medically accepted methods of contraception listed on the form for a period of one month following the study. Female subjects of non-childbearing potential, defined as physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, must meet the criteria listed on the Female Enrollment form, but are not restricted to the use of contraception following study participation.
- Participants must be able to sit upright for periods of 30 minutes.
- Participants should have a body mass index between 19 and 30 kg/m2
- Initial post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score following blunt head trauma of 3 to 12 or coma (not due to sedation) greater than 6 hours. Emergence from Post-traumatic Amnesia as documented by serial administration of the Orientation-Log or Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test
- Have an anticipated hospital length of stay of 5 days or more following screening and consent.
- Able to provide consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- Persons who are known to be allergic to iodine
- Persons who have extensive soft tissue damage to the neck region, including carotid artery dissection, spinal cord injury, or other conditions, that makes lymphatic drainage techniques undesirable.
- Women who are of child bearing potential who do not agree to use medically acceptable contraceptives for one month following the study.
- Subjects who are participating in another interventional trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eva Sevick, PhD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 9, 2021
First Posted
November 22, 2021
Study Start
May 18, 2022
Primary Completion
July 22, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
March 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share