The Effect of Manual Lymphatic Drainage
Investigation of the Effect of Manual Lymphatic Drainag on Venous Ulcer Healing Rate
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In venous ulcer, venous insufficiency is accompanied by lymphatic insufficiency. Manual lymphatic drainage (mld) technique cause to increase contraction rate of lymphatic collector and venous flow. It is known that Manual lymphatic drainage accelerates microcirculation, enabling nutrients and oxygen to reach tissues and at the same time removing residual substances from the tissue. We hypothesis that if we inrease to lypmhatic activity with MLD, we could stimulate healing of ulcer. The aim of this study to investigate the effect of manual lymphatic drainage on venous ulcer healing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedJuly 8, 2020
July 1, 2020
10 months
July 2, 2020
July 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Evaluation of wound healing
Wound was assesed by analyzing photographes of wound with Tracker software.
Change from baseline wound healing following the end of treatment (12. treatment session) and 1 month after the end of treatment.
Evaluation of range of motion of ankle
range of motion of ankle was measured with goniometer
Change from baseline range of motion following the end of treatment (12. treatment session) and 1 month after the end of treatment.
Evaluation of pain
Pain was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale between 0 (no pain)-10 (extreme) pain.
Change from baseline pain following the end of treatment (12. treatment session) and 1 month after the end of treatment.
evaluation of edema
edema was measured by 3D scanner
Change from baseline edema following the end of treatment (12. treatment session) and 1 month after the end of treatment.
evaluation of quality of life
quality of life was evaluated by SF- 12
Change from baseline quality of life following scores the end of treatment (12. treatment session) and 1 month after the end of treatment.
Study Arms (2)
Manual Lymphatic Drainage Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients were treated 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The treatment program of these patients included manual lymphatic drainage on the leg, skin care, bandaging and exercise.
Shame Manual Lymphatic Drainage Group
SHAM COMPARATORAll patients were treated 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The treatment program of these patients included shame manual lymphatic drainage on the leg, skin care, bandaging and exercise. Shame manual lymphatic drainage include light touches instead of real manual lymphatic drainage techniques
Interventions
MLD vith vodder technique was applied to leg
Wound was cleaned with salin and covered by dressing without including active products
breathing and foot pump exercise was prescribed
manual lymphatic drainage was applied with light touch instead of real mld techniques
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- with venous ulcer unhealing for at least 6 weeks
- Without enfection
- vascular surgery is not indicated
- There is no obstruction to apply MLD and compression to lower extremty
You may not qualify if:
- with diabetic mellutus
- with enfection
- with ABI\<0,7
- Patients who have undergone venous vascular surgery
- Patients undergoing active wound closure treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Saglık Bilimleri University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
Azoubel R, Torres Gde V, da Silva LW, Gomes FV, dos Reis LA. [Effects of the decongestive physiotherapy in the healing of venous ulcers]. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2010 Dec;44(4):1085-92. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342010000400033. Portuguese.
PMID: 21337794RESULTCrawford JM, Lal BK, Duran WN, Pappas PJ. Pathophysiology of venous ulceration. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Jul;5(4):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.03.015.
PMID: 28624002RESULTde Roos KP, Wittens CH, Maessen-Visch MB, van der Wegen-Franken CP. [Universal Dutch guideline on 'Venous disease']. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158(0):A8076. Dutch.
PMID: 27707417RESULTWilliams A. Manual lymphatic drainage: exploring the history and evidence base. Br J Community Nurs. 2010 Apr;15(4):S18-24. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2010.15.Sup3.47365.
PMID: 20559172RESULTKelechi TJ, Johnson JJ, Yates S. Chronic venous disease and venous leg ulcers: An evidence-based update. J Vasc Nurs. 2015 Jun;33(2):36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2015.01.003.
PMID: 26025146RESULTHampton S. An introduction to various types of leg ulcers and their management. Br J Nurs. 2006 Jun 8-21;15(11):S9-13. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.Sup2.21235.
PMID: 16835515RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nilüfer Kablan, PhD
University of Health science
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2020
First Posted
July 8, 2020
Study Start
September 11, 2018
Primary Completion
July 3, 2019
Study Completion
May 29, 2020
Last Updated
July 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07