Covid-19 Pandemic and Use of Video Laryngoscopy
Airway Management During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy Versus Video Laryngoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes a highly contagious infection with the highest viral load in the upper respiratory secretions. Despite using personal protective equipment, SARS-CoV-2 contamination to the healthcare personnel is possible during the airway management of infected patients. Direct laryngoscopy remains as the most common method for endotracheal intubation. Our study aimed to compare the use of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in adult patients receiving general anesthesia for elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 9, 2022
March 1, 2022
3 months
November 15, 2021
March 8, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intubation time
Time from Beginning of Intubation to Full Ventilation of the Lungs
First 5 minutes of the operation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intubation Comfort
First 5 minutes of the operation
Cormack-Lehane Scoring
First 5 minutes of the operation
Study Arms (2)
Videolaryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients were intubated with the C-MAC PM-Karl Storz Video laryngoscope.
Laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients were intubated with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-II
- Elective surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Intraoral or neck surgery
- gastroesophageal reflux
- delayed gastric emptying
- pregnancy
- scoliosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Erzurum City Hospital
Erzurum, 25100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Piepho T, Fortmueller K, Heid FM, Schmidtmann I, Werner C, Noppens RR. Performance of the C-MAC video laryngoscope in patients after a limited glottic view using Macintosh laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1101-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06872.x. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
PMID: 21883131BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2021
First Posted
November 16, 2021
Study Start
November 30, 2021
Primary Completion
February 15, 2022
Study Completion
March 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03