High Velocity Nasal Insufflation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
compare the efficacy of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI) versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in managing COVID 19 pneumonic patients with acute type 1 respiratory failure
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2025
CompletedOctober 9, 2025
October 1, 2025
6 months
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correction of hypoxia in COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure
assessment of efficacy of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
ACTIVE COMPARATORCOVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure received Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
High Velocity Nasal Insufflation
ACTIVE COMPARATORCOVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure received High Velocity Nasal Insufflation
Interventions
COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure received High Velocity Nasal Insufflation
COVID 19 Pneumonic Patients with Acute Type 1 Respiratory Failure received Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged above 18 years with COVID 19 pneumonia with acute type 1 respiratory failure were included.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure.
- patients with a disturbed level of consciousness and/or a high risk of aspiration
- individuals with hypotension
- patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mohamed AbdElmoniem
Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed AbdElmoniem
Lecturer of chest medicine faculty of medicine Mansoura university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2025
First Posted
October 9, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
October 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10