NCT05118594

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of an evidence-based system to recommend core interventions, before the beginning of treatment, to psychotherapists treating low-income patients with depressive or anxiety disorders.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder

Timeline
6mo left

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress35%
Feb 2026Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2021

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 12, 2021

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2026

Last Updated

November 18, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

November 2, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 11, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Depressive disordersAnxiety disorders

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change from Baseline in Depressive Severity on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at Week 15

    The PHQ-9 is a validated 9-item self-reported measure of depression severity grounded on the diagnostic criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV), with higher scores representing greater severity. Items are rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"). Change= Estimated weekly change from Baseline to Week 15 from a multilevel growth curve model

    Baseline and Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in Anxiety Severity on the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at Week 15

    The GAD-7 is a self-reported measure that evaluates the overall anxiety severity with seven items rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all) to 3 ("Nearly every day"). Greater scores represents higher severity. Change= Estimated weekly change on severity from Baseline to Week 15 from a multilevel growth curve model

    Baseline and Week 15

  • Change from Baseline in Overall Functioning on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) at Week 15

    The WHODAS is a validated self-reported measure that evaluates overall functioning with 12 items rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("None") to 4 ("Extreme"). Greater scores represents higher disability. Change= Estimated weekly change on severity from Baseline to Week 15 from a multilevel growth curve model

    Baseline and Week 15

  • Average Adherence to the Recommended Interventions on the Multitheoretical List of Therapeutic Interventions (MULTI-30) Across Treatment

    The MULTI-30 is a validated and reliable measure to assessed the adherence to therapeutic interventions in a given session. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all typical to the session") to 5 ("Very typical to the session"). For the project the investigators will test the following MULTI-30 subscales: Cognitive, Behavioral, Interpersonal, and Person-centered. In this study the investigators will use the therapist version of the MULTI-30. Average Adherence= Mean Score of the Recommended Interventions Across all the Sessions of the Treatment.

    Week 1 and Week 15

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic Status at Week 15 in the Primary Diagnoses Identified at Baseline with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview

    Baseline and Week 15

Study Arms (1)

Pre-treatment recommendations

EXPERIMENTAL

Therapists receive automatized feedback at the beginning of the treatments with recommendations regarding the most appropriate interventions to use with their patients based on a machine learning algorithm developed on a previous study.

Behavioral: Pre-treatment psychotherapy recommendations

Interventions

After patients complete an intake evaluation and prior to starting therapy, the assigned therapist will receive automatized feedback that consists of recommendations regarding the most suitable interventions (i.e., cognitive, behavioral, interpersonal or patient-centered) for each individual patients, based on patients' baseline characteristics and a machine learning algorithm developed in a previous study. Besides the interventions recommended, therapist will receive within the system guideline and tutorial videos showing how to deliver adequately the specific interventions recommended.

Pre-treatment recommendations

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnoses of a depressive disorder (i.e., major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder) or an anxiety disorder (i.e., specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia or generalized anxiety disorder) determined with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
  • A score of at least two (mild) in any the five items from the depression and anxiety domains of the DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure-Adult
  • A total family income below the poverty index threshold, determined by a Licensed Social Worker
  • Aged 18 to 65
  • Fluency in Spanish language
  • Capacity to consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Psychosis
  • Mania
  • Suicidal ideation with intent and/or plan
  • Substance abuse disorders
  • History of organic mental disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • Solomonov N, McCarthy KS, Gorman BS, Barber JP. The Multitheoretical List of Therapeutic Interventions - 30 items (MULTI-30). Psychother Res. 2019 Jul;29(5):565-580. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1422216. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

    PMID: 29336228BACKGROUND
  • Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.

    PMID: 9881538BACKGROUND
  • Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, Saxena S, von Korff M, Pull C; WHO/NIH Joint Project. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.

    PMID: 21076562BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

    PMID: 11556941BACKGROUND
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, MajorDysthymic DisorderPhobia, SpecificPhobia, SocialPanic DisorderAgoraphobiaGeneralized Anxiety DisorderDepressive DisorderAnxiety Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mood DisordersMental DisordersPhobic Disorders

Study Officials

  • Juan M Gomez Penedo, PhD

    National Council of Scientific and Technical Research

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Juan M Gomez Penedo, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Therapists will receive patient-specific treatment recommendations (based on a machine-learning based algorithm developed in a previous study) regarding the most suitable interventions to be used to treat each study patient.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2021

First Posted

November 12, 2021

Study Start

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Last Updated

November 18, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

We will share individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results of publications of the project, upon request. Furthermore, following the particular scientific journals' standards, we will share analytic code of published results.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Upon request, we will start sharing IPD 6 months after the publication of the main outcome paper in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. We will maintain our de-identified database indefinitely for potential future requests.
Access Criteria
For meta-analyses or replications, we will share de-identified IPD, an associated data dictionary, and supporting information to scientific colleagues showing a track record of publications in psychotherapy research following ethical guidelines. We can also share IPD for secondary analyses, grounded on previously agreed collaborations and under a clear establishment of manuscript authorship arrangements. Requests should be send via email to the PI, Dr. Juan Martín Gómez Penedo (jmgomezpenedo@gmail.com). If the data usage details are unclear or questionable Dr. Gómez Penedo reserves the right to deny individual data share requests.