Testing a Precision Psychotherapy System for Low-income Patients
ML_LMIC
Open-trial to Prospectively Test the Feasibility of a Precision Psychotherapy System for Low-income Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
111
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of an evidence-based system to recommend core interventions, before the beginning of treatment, to psychotherapists treating low-income patients with depressive or anxiety disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
November 18, 2021
November 1, 2021
9 months
November 2, 2021
November 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline in Depressive Severity on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at Week 15
The PHQ-9 is a validated 9-item self-reported measure of depression severity grounded on the diagnostic criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV), with higher scores representing greater severity. Items are rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"). Change= Estimated weekly change from Baseline to Week 15 from a multilevel growth curve model
Baseline and Week 15
Change from Baseline in Anxiety Severity on the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at Week 15
The GAD-7 is a self-reported measure that evaluates the overall anxiety severity with seven items rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all) to 3 ("Nearly every day"). Greater scores represents higher severity. Change= Estimated weekly change on severity from Baseline to Week 15 from a multilevel growth curve model
Baseline and Week 15
Change from Baseline in Overall Functioning on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) at Week 15
The WHODAS is a validated self-reported measure that evaluates overall functioning with 12 items rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("None") to 4 ("Extreme"). Greater scores represents higher disability. Change= Estimated weekly change on severity from Baseline to Week 15 from a multilevel growth curve model
Baseline and Week 15
Average Adherence to the Recommended Interventions on the Multitheoretical List of Therapeutic Interventions (MULTI-30) Across Treatment
The MULTI-30 is a validated and reliable measure to assessed the adherence to therapeutic interventions in a given session. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all typical to the session") to 5 ("Very typical to the session"). For the project the investigators will test the following MULTI-30 subscales: Cognitive, Behavioral, Interpersonal, and Person-centered. In this study the investigators will use the therapist version of the MULTI-30. Average Adherence= Mean Score of the Recommended Interventions Across all the Sessions of the Treatment.
Week 1 and Week 15
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Status at Week 15 in the Primary Diagnoses Identified at Baseline with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview
Baseline and Week 15
Study Arms (1)
Pre-treatment recommendations
EXPERIMENTALTherapists receive automatized feedback at the beginning of the treatments with recommendations regarding the most appropriate interventions to use with their patients based on a machine learning algorithm developed on a previous study.
Interventions
After patients complete an intake evaluation and prior to starting therapy, the assigned therapist will receive automatized feedback that consists of recommendations regarding the most suitable interventions (i.e., cognitive, behavioral, interpersonal or patient-centered) for each individual patients, based on patients' baseline characteristics and a machine learning algorithm developed in a previous study. Besides the interventions recommended, therapist will receive within the system guideline and tutorial videos showing how to deliver adequately the specific interventions recommended.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnoses of a depressive disorder (i.e., major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder) or an anxiety disorder (i.e., specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia or generalized anxiety disorder) determined with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
- A score of at least two (mild) in any the five items from the depression and anxiety domains of the DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure-Adult
- A total family income below the poverty index threshold, determined by a Licensed Social Worker
- Aged 18 to 65
- Fluency in Spanish language
- Capacity to consent
You may not qualify if:
- Psychosis
- Mania
- Suicidal ideation with intent and/or plan
- Substance abuse disorders
- History of organic mental disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Solomonov N, McCarthy KS, Gorman BS, Barber JP. The Multitheoretical List of Therapeutic Interventions - 30 items (MULTI-30). Psychother Res. 2019 Jul;29(5):565-580. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1422216. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
PMID: 29336228BACKGROUNDSheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.
PMID: 9881538BACKGROUNDUstun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, Saxena S, von Korff M, Pull C; WHO/NIH Joint Project. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.
PMID: 21076562BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan M Gomez Penedo, PhD
National Council of Scientific and Technical Research
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2021
First Posted
November 12, 2021
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Upon request, we will start sharing IPD 6 months after the publication of the main outcome paper in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. We will maintain our de-identified database indefinitely for potential future requests.
- Access Criteria
- For meta-analyses or replications, we will share de-identified IPD, an associated data dictionary, and supporting information to scientific colleagues showing a track record of publications in psychotherapy research following ethical guidelines. We can also share IPD for secondary analyses, grounded on previously agreed collaborations and under a clear establishment of manuscript authorship arrangements. Requests should be send via email to the PI, Dr. Juan Martín Gómez Penedo (jmgomezpenedo@gmail.com). If the data usage details are unclear or questionable Dr. Gómez Penedo reserves the right to deny individual data share requests.
We will share individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results of publications of the project, upon request. Furthermore, following the particular scientific journals' standards, we will share analytic code of published results.