NCT05113186

Brief Summary

Percutaneous ablation (PA) is the only non-surgical curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Due to its excellent tolerance, particularly in patients with portal hypertension or bearing comorbidities, it now represents in France nearly 70% of the first-line curative treatment of "in Milan" tumours. For HCC less than 3 cm, ideal indication for percutaneous ablations, results of monopolar radiofrequency ablation (mRFA), are excellent with only 5% of reported non-tumoral control after a first procedure. In addition to mRFA the arsenal of ablations has grown considerably with the emergence of new techniques which allow the expansion of indications for PA, especially in patients with poor prognostic tumors or relatively advanced beyond the Milan criteria. In this setting, multibipolar mode using no touch technique (mbpRFAnt) increases the tumour volume than can be ablated, allowing the removal of large tumors\> 5 cm. Inadequate tumour control is then de facto greater in these situations, around 20%. Difficult-to-access tumors can furthermore be treated by percutaneous irreversible electrotroporation (IRE). Despite a tumor burden accessible for curative ablation, a phenotype of "aggressive" HCC characterized by high rates of local recurrences is yet to be defined. Up to now, several characteristics might define this subtype with a poor-prognosis and include 1) high serum alpha-foetoprotein (AFP) levels, 2) radiological infiltrative form, and 3) histological macrotrabecular subtype. Based on these characteristics, median recurrence-free survival of these patients is usually below 10 months. High serum AFP level is a well-known predictor of HCC recurrence following curative procedure. In patients treated by percutaneous ablation, regardless of the technique used and irrespective of tumor burden, high baseline serum AFP level has tenaciously been reported as an independent predictor or recurrence.. More recently, the radiological description of infiltrative HCC (as opposed to mass-forming) has been identified as an aggressive from of HCC with a poor prognosis even when eligible for ablation. This aspect is often associated with infra-clinical invasion of the portal veins (PV), leading to poor prognosis. Finally, a "massive macrotrabecular" (MTM) histological subtype of HCC associated with specific molecular features has recently been described. This MTM-HCC subtype, reliably observed in 12% of patients eligible for curative treatment, represents an aggressive form of HCC is an independent predictor of early and overall recurrence following PA, which is retained even after patient stratification according to common clinical, biological, and pathological features of aggressiveness. The idea of optimizing HCC curative treatments using adjuvant biotherapy, particularly in patients with poor-prognosis tumors in curative intent, is particularly attractive. One trial in adjuvant setting was conducted, the STORM trial, that tested the benefit of sorafenib in curative intent of in Milan HCC. This negative trial included patients within Milan HCC, with an expected low rate of recurrence with only few patients treated by PA. Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor which has been recently approved as firs-line therapy for advanced HCC. The investigators assume that lenvatinib could have also a synergistic local action with PA in two ways. First, given as neoadjuvant regimen, lenvatinib by reducing tumor and liver perfusion could decrease the global heat sink effect associated with loco-regional blood microcirculation during PA. Second, by carrying on in adjuvant treatment, lenvatinib could decrease the magnitude of non-specific inflammatory angiogenesis around the treatment zone, therefore reducing the risk of locoregional (intrasegmental) cells tumor spreading or promotion. Given the dismall prognosis of the aforementioned poor-prognosis HCC eligible for PA with an overall median recurrence-free survival below 10 months, the investigators hypothesis is that addition of Lenvatinib as neo- and adjuvant therapy might increase tumour control in these difficult-to-treat patients. Patients combining either high serum AFP levels, infiltrative form or MTM-HCC histological subtype represent 30% of BCLC A stage HCC patients in expert centers, and are the ideal candidates for such trials. Therefore, the first aim of this proposal is to assess the benefit of lenvatinib in neo- and adjuvant setting combined with curative percutaneous ablation for BCLC A HCC patients considered at high risk of local recurrence (high AFP or infiltrative form or macrotrabecular massive subtype).

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 hepatocellular-carcinoma

Timeline
5mo left

Started Feb 2022

Longer than P75 for phase_2 hepatocellular-carcinoma

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress91%
Feb 2022Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 31, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 9, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 2, 2022

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 19, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 2, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

January 29, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

July 31, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

LenvatinibAdjuvantNeoadjuvantcurative intentpercutaneous ablative

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • One-year local recurrence-free survival

    Recurrence rate local will be assessed using imaging techniques as recommended by international guidelines (3-months US and MRI during two years). Patients who will meet primary endpoint will be alive 1 year afterPA procedure without evidence of local recurrence on 3-months US/MRI evaluations.

    At one year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Per nodule assessment of early response (one month) after PA

    At one month after a single procedure of PA

  • Per nodule assessment of local recurrence

    During 2 years following PA procedure

Other Outcomes (12)

  • Per nodule assessment of intra segmental distant recurrence

    During 2 years following PA procedure

  • Per nodule assessment of extra segmental distant recurrence

    During 2 years following PA procedure

  • Assessment of overall recurrence-free survival at 1 and 2 years

    At 1 year and 2 years following PA procedure

  • +9 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy with lenvatinib

EXPERIMENTAL

* Neoadjuvant therapy with lenvatinib to complete a 3-week course, stopping 1 week before the planned date of PA procedure * Adjuvant therapy with lenvatinib for 3 months starting after the PA evaluation (± 14 days) The daily dose of lenvatinib will be 12 mg (≥60 kg) or 8 mg (\<60 kg). Lenvatinib will be taken within 2 hours after a light meal, preferably in the morning.

Drug: Lenvatinib Pill

Interventions

The design of study is summarized as follows: * Neoadjuvant phase with lenvatinib for 21 days (rationale: compromise between expected benefit and acceptable tolerance without compromising ablation procedure) * PA of HCC in a curative intent (radiofrequency, microwave or electroporation) * Adjuvant phase with lenvatinib for 3 months (rationale: compromise between expected benefit and acceptable tolerance without compromising ablation procedure)

Also known as: percutaneous ablative procedure
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy with lenvatinib

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female patients ≥ 18 years
  • Histological or radiological diagnosis of HCC, whether new or recurrent following a prior curative therapeutic management \> 6 months.
  • Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage Category A
  • Comprising at least one of the following the following characteristics:
  • Single tumour\>3 cm≤ 5cm or
  • Multiple tumours (max 3 lesions ≤ 3cm) or
  • Single tumour between 2 and 3 cm with at least one of the following characteristic:
  • Serum AFP\>100 ng/mL
  • Infiltrative form
  • Macro-trabecular subtype (if applicable)
  • Patients with HCC amenable for PA as assessed by multidisciplinary board
  • At least one uni-dimensional measurable lesion by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to modified RECIST for HCC
  • Absence of any portal vein thrombosis
  • Liver function status Child-Pugh Class A
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 1
  • +17 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with recurrence of HCC occurring less than six months after a curative treatment regarded as successful
  • BCLC stage \>A (1 single lesion \>5cm or more than 3 lesions ore multifocal HCC \>3cm or vascular invasion or extra-hepatic spread)
  • Patients with contraindications to PA
  • Pacemakers or patients who have a history of cardiac arrhythmias or irregular heartbeats (in case of electroporation procedure)
  • Ascites
  • Coagulopathy
  • Ongoing bacterial infection
  • Patients with contraindication to contrast medium intravenous injection either gadolinium or iodinate
  • Prior liver transplantation
  • Prior systemic treatment for HCC (chemotherapy, any other TKI, immunotherapy)
  • Patients with large esophageal varices at risk of bleeding that are not being treated with conventional medical intervention
  • Past or concurrent history of neoplasm other than HCC, except for in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri and/or non-melanoma skin cancer and superficial bladder tumours. Any cancer curatively treated \> 3 years prior to study entry is permitted
  • Major surgical procedure or significant traumatic injury within 28 days before enrolment
  • Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ class 2
  • Unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months before enrolment
  • +13 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NAHON

Bobigny, 93000, France

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Nault JC, Sutter O, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Seror O. Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and innovations. J Hepatol. 2018 Apr;68(4):783-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

    PMID: 29031662BACKGROUND
  • N'Kontchou G, Nault JC, Sutter O, Bourcier V, Coderc E, Grando V, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Diallo A, Sellier N, Seror O. Multibipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Mass-Forming and Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinomas > 5 cm: Long-Term Results. Liver Cancer. 2019 May;8(3):172-185. doi: 10.1159/000489319. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

    PMID: 31192154BACKGROUND
  • Sutter O, Calvo J, N'Kontchou G, Nault JC, Ourabia R, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Bourcier V, Zentar N, Bouhafs F, Sellier N, Diallo A, Seror O. Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Not Amenable to Thermal Ablation Techniques: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series. Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):877-886. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161413. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

    PMID: 28453431BACKGROUND
  • Ziol M, Pote N, Amaddeo G, Laurent A, Nault JC, Oberti F, Costentin C, Michalak S, Bouattour M, Francoz C, Pageaux GP, Ramos J, Decaens T, Luciani A, Guiu B, Vilgrain V, Aube C, Derman J, Charpy C, Zucman-Rossi J, Barget N, Seror O, Ganne-Carrie N, Paradis V, Calderaro J. Macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma: A distinctive histological subtype with clinical relevance. Hepatology. 2018 Jul;68(1):103-112. doi: 10.1002/hep.29762. Epub 2018 May 9.

    PMID: 29281854BACKGROUND
  • Bruix J, Takayama T, Mazzaferro V, Chau GY, Yang J, Kudo M, Cai J, Poon RT, Han KH, Tak WY, Lee HC, Song T, Roayaie S, Bolondi L, Lee KS, Makuuchi M, Souza F, Berre MA, Meinhardt G, Llovet JM; STORM investigators. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1344-54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00198-9. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

    PMID: 26361969BACKGROUND
  • Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, Baron A, Park JW, Han G, Jassem J, Blanc JF, Vogel A, Komov D, Evans TRJ, Lopez C, Dutcus C, Guo M, Saito K, Kraljevic S, Tamai T, Ren M, Cheng AL. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1163-1173. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.

    PMID: 29433850BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Interventions

lenvatinib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Study Officials

  • Pierre NAHON, MD-PhD

    APHP-Hôpital Jean Verdier

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: a pilot interventional study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2021

First Posted

November 9, 2021

Study Start

February 2, 2022

Primary Completion

June 19, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 2, 2026

Last Updated

January 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations