NCT05097144

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance and subjective lens handling (insertion and removal) of two toric silicone hydrogel contact lenses after one month of daily wear each.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 21, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 15, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 8, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 8, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 24, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 17, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

October 15, 2021

Results QC Date

August 1, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 5, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Lens Handling (Insertion and Removal)

    Subjective lens handling measured ease of insertion and removal on a scale of 0-10, where 10=better performance.

    1 month

Study Arms (2)

Lens A, then Lens B

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants wore Lens A for one month and then wore Lens B for one month.

Device: Lens A (fanfilcon A)Device: Lens B (asmofilcon A)

Lens B, then Lens A

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants wore Lens B for one month and then wore Lens A for one month.

Device: Lens A (fanfilcon A)Device: Lens B (asmofilcon A)

Interventions

Daily wear for one month

Lens A, then Lens BLens B, then Lens A

Daily wear for one month

Lens A, then Lens BLens B, then Lens A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
  • Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
  • Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer
  • Is not a habitual wearer of either study lens
  • Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +4.00 to - 10.00 (inclusive). Best corrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better in either eye
  • Have contact lens prescription of no less than -0.75D of astigmatism and no more than -2.25 D in both eyes.
  • Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
  • Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
  • Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter.
  • Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses.
  • Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, \> 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so).
  • Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

You may not qualify if:

  • A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
  • A person was excluded from the study if he/she:
  • Has a CL prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses.
  • Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.50 D of cylinder in either eye.
  • Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (5 days per week; \> 8 hours/day)
  • Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.
  • Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities
  • Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
  • Pathological dry eye or associated findings
  • Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
  • Neovascularization \> 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
  • Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
  • Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
  • Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Autonomous University (UNAM)

Mexico City, Código, 54090, Mexico

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AstigmatismMyopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
José A. Vega OD, MSc, FAAO
Organization
CooperVision Inc.

Study Officials

  • Rubén Velázquez Guerrero, MSc, FIACLE

    National Autonomous University (UNAM)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2021

First Posted

October 28, 2021

Study Start

August 21, 2021

Primary Completion

December 8, 2021

Study Completion

December 8, 2021

Last Updated

October 17, 2023

Results First Posted

August 24, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10

Locations