Clinical Validation of Biofinity Toric MTO (Made To Order) Lenses
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study hypothesis is there is no difference in the clinical performance between the test and control lenses, in particular in lens stability, toric mislocation, comfort ratings and anterior segment ocular health findings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 2, 2017
CompletedMarch 7, 2017
January 1, 2017
Same day
July 7, 2014
August 2, 2016
January 24, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (19)
Lens Surface Assessment of Study Lenses - Surface Wettability
Investigator's objective assessment of lens surface wettability at 15min and 6hrs. Scale (0-4; 0=non-wetting, 4=Excellent)
15min & 6hrs
Lens Surface Assessment of Study Lenses - Deposits
Investigator's objective assessment of lens surface deposition at 15min and 6hrs. Graded on the appearance of lens surface by slit lamp. Rated on a scale (0-4; 0=no deposits, 4=deposits ≥0.5mm or film \> 75% of surface)
15min & 6hrs
Lens Surface Assessment of Study Lenses - Surface Acceptance
Investigator's objective assessment of surface acceptance at 15min and 6hrs. Rated on a scale (0-4; 0=very poor, 4=excellent)
15min & 6hrs
Subjective Rating For Comfort - Comfort Since Last Visit
Participant's subjective rating of comfort now of study lenses. Surveyed at 15min, 3hr, and 6hr. Scale (0-100; 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever)
15min, 3hrs, 6hrs
Subjective Rating For Comfort Preference
Participant's subjective rating of comfort preference of study lenses. Scale: (Strongly Prefer Right lens - Strongly Prefer Left Lens)
1min, 15min, 3hrs, 6hrs
Subjective Rating For Handling - Insertion
Participant's subjective rating for ease of insertion of the study lenses. Scale (0-100; 0=could not place lens on eye;100=always easy to place lens on eye)
1 min
Subjective Rating For Handling - Removal
Participant's subjective rating for ease of removal of study lenses. Scale (0-100; 0=could not remove lens from eye;100=always easy to place remove from eye)
1 min
Investigator's Assessment of Stability
Investigator's assessment of the study lenses overall stability difference measured from 0-180 degrees, 0=very good stability, 180=very bad stability.
15min & 6hrs
General Lens Fit - Fit Acceptance
Investigator's assessment for fit acceptance of study lenses. Scale: 0-4 (0=Should not be worn; 4=Perfect)
15min & 6hrs
Lens Fitting - Rotation/Mislocation
Investigator's observed the rotation/mislocation (toric mark) of study lenses from the desired 6 o'clock position following temp rotation 30 degrees, 10 blinks; rotation toward desired 6 o'clock position=(+); rotation away from desired 6 o'clock position=(-).
Baseline, 15min & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - Corneal Staining (Central)
Corneal staining (central) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. (Scale 0-4, 0=No staining; 4= \>45% of area)
baseline & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - Corneal Staining (Nasal)
Corneal staining (nasal) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. (Scale 0-4, 0=No staining; 4= \>45% of area)
baseline & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - Corneal Staining (Temporal)
Corneal staining (temporal) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. (Scale 0-4, 0=No staining; 4= \>45% of area)
baseline & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - CornealStaining (Superior)
Corneal staining (superior) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. (Scale 0-4, 0=No staining; 4= \>45% of area)
baseline & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - Corneal Staining (Inferior)
Corneal staining (inferior) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. (Scale 0-4, 0=No staining; 4= \>45% of area)
baseline & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - Conjunctival Staining (Nasal)
Conjunctival staining (nasal) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. Scale: 0-4, (0=None; 4=Deep confluent).
baseline & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - Conjunctival Staining (Superior)
Conjunctival staining (superior) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. Scale: 0-4, (0=None; 4=Deep confluent).
baseline & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - Conjunctival Staining (Temporal)
Conjunctival staining (temporal) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. Scale: 0-4, (0=None; 4=Deep confluent).
baseline & 6hrs
Anterior Ocular Health - Conjunctival Staining (Inferior)
Conjunctival staining (inferior) for comfilcon (A) toric and comfilcon (A) toric XR lenses assessed at baseline and 6 hours. Scale: 0-4, (0=None; 4=Deep confluent).
baseline & 6hrs
Study Arms (2)
comfilcon A MTO
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will be randomized to receive either the Test or Control lens as a matched pair at each visit per a predetermined randomization schedule.
comfilcon A
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be randomized to receive either the Test or Control lens as a matched pair at each visit per a predetermined randomization schedule.
Interventions
Randomized to a test lens in one eye and control lens in the other as a matched pair.
Randomized to a test lens in one eye and control lens in the other as a matched pair.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years.
- Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer.
- Has read and understood the information consent letter.
- Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.
- Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual vision correction or 20/20 best-corrected.
- Currently wears soft contact lenses.
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease.
- Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the examination
You may not qualify if:
- Has never worn contact lenses before.
- Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
- Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health.
- Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses.
- Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye.
- Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.
- Is aphakic.
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
- Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CORL, Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. Manager, Clinical Research
- Organization
- CooperVision, Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pete S Kollbaum, O.D.
Indiana University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2014
First Posted
July 9, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 7, 2017
Results First Posted
January 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01