Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
Secondary identifiers
interventional
51
1 country
1
Study Start
March 3, 2022
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
July 28, 2022
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 28, 2022
Actual (reported)Background: Research has shown that anxiety affects more than feelings. It also affects behavior. Researchers want to learn how the brain and body respond to unexpected threats. They want to see if probable pleasant or unpleasant events change decisions. Objective: To better understand how changes in anxiety are associated with changes in decision-making. Eligibility: Adults aged 18-50 with generalized anxiety disorder, seasonal affective disorder, or panic disorder. Healthy volunteers are also needed. Design: Participants will be screened under protocol #01-M-0254. Participants will complete surveys about their anxiety, risk-taking, and curiosity. Participants will complete a computer task. They will be given different choices. They will make a choice. They will receive an unpleasant or pleasant stimulus based on their choice. They will repeat this task many times. Most participants will do the task in the clinic. The unpleasant stimulus will be electric shock and acoustic startle. They will receive electric shocks through electrodes placed on their arm or fingers. They may hear loud noises through headphones. Their eyeblinks will be recorded with electrodes placed under their eye. Their heart rate and skin conductance activity will be collected with electrodes as well. Some healthy volunteers will do the task during a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan. They will lie on a table that slides in and out of a scanner. A coil will be placed over their head. The unpleasant stimulus will be electric shock, given as stated above. The scanner will record their brain activity. Their breathing and pulse rate will be recorded as well. Participation will last for 3-4 hours.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 28, 2022
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
October 23, 2021
Actual (reported)October 26, 2021
Actual (reported)March 3, 2022
Actual (reported)July 28, 2022
Actual (reported)July 28, 2022
Actual (reported)May 22, 2024
Actual (reported)Difference in Learning Rate
Learning rate is a hyperparameter that quantifies the degree to which subjects update their beliefs in response to feedback. The outcome examined the difference in learning rate between experimental manipulation (condition) and population (healthy and anxiety subjects). During the multi-arm bandit task, participants choose from a set of choices and update their belief of the value of the choices based on prior choices with some choices having a higher probability of shock (punishment) than reward. The changes in learning rate were measured using the learning rate algorithm. The difference in learning rate was analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA with condition and population. The learning rate (α) range between 0 and 1. The higher the value, the faster rate of learning. However, a higher learning rate may also result in lower generalization capability.
End of experiment (3-4 hours in a single day visit)
Participants with anxiety completed computer tasks. They were given different choices and had to make choice(s). The objective was to find the optimal choice by sampling through the choices. They received an unpleasant or pleasant stimulus based on their choice(s). They repeated these tasks many times.
Healthy volunteers completed computer tasks. They were given different choices and had to make choice(s). The objective was to find the optimal choice by sampling through the choices. They received an unpleasant or pleasant stimulus based on their choice(s). They repeated these tasks many times.
Shock and startle devices were used as aversive stimulus (shock and startle)
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Maryland Pao, M.D.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
51 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
October 23, 2021
First Posted
October 26, 2021
Study Start
March 3, 2022
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
July 28, 2022
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 28, 2022
Actual (reported)Last Updated
May 22, 2024
Results First Posted
May 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2022-07-28
De-identified data will be shared to a repository. Identified individual participant data will not be shared.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: