The Effects of High Intensity Circuit Training in Nature Vs. Indoor on Exercise Performance, and Wellbeing
A Randomized Trial of High Intensity Circuit Training in Nature and Indoors to Compare Exercise Performance, Emotions, Perceived Exertion, and the Variability of Movement and Heart Rate in Recreational Exercisers.
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Exercising in a nature setting has been credited with benefits for health and well-being, more so than exercising indoors. Additionally, motoric performance in the same exercise (e.g., running speed, more strenuous physical activity) has been reported in some studies to be greater if practiced outdoors, in a nature setting. The explanation may be in the inherent variability of natural landscapes, the textures, elevations, obstacles and objects which are not found in standard built and indoor settings. Indoor settings are characterized by safe, organized, patterned textures and objects created for specific ends, which inhibit variability in physical and physiological behavior. Variability in the environment turns into variability in body systems, which benefits health, well-being, and skill acquisition. Variability in behavior depends also on the task. Running or walking is essentially a journey throughout the environment in which interaction with obstacles, puddles, and other runners is part of the variability of the activity. On the other hand, physical activity such as HICT is done in a small area, and is a scripted, prescribed activity (e.g., push-ups, sit-ups), which lowers the amount of variability in behavior. The aim of this trial is to test if a low variability activity shows differences in performance, wellbeing, and behavior measures according to the amount of variability in the environment. In this trial the participants will engage in two high intensity circuit training (HICT) interventions - one in an indoor setting, and another in a nature setting. The HICT intervention includes 12 calisthenic exercises, and will be performed at a self-selected intensity by the participants. Each exercise will be performed during one minute, followed by 30 seconds of rest where the participants will be instructed what the next exercise will be. Before exercising, the participants put a heart rate monitor and two inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the right arm and leg, according to the correct usage guidelines, and rate their positive affect, arousal, and perceived exertion. Immediately after exercising, they rate the same measures again. Research Hypotheses: Greater movement variability, heart rate variability, performance, wellbeing, and arousal during HICT in nature setting than indoor setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2024
CompletedMarch 20, 2024
March 1, 2024
1.1 years
September 29, 2021
March 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Heart Rate Variability
Heart Rate Variability is the variation in R-R intervals (time between systolic injections) of the heart. Heart bands will be used to collect the base R-R intervals
through study completion, an average of 10 minutes
Movement Variability
changes in acceleration of body segments can be seen as a direct measure of body movement adaptation to environmental constraints.
through study completion, an average of 10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Exercise performance
through study completion, an average of 10 minutes
Change score of the Feeling Scale
through study completion, an average of 10 minutes
Change score of the Rating of Perceived Exertion
through study completion, an average of 10 minutes
Change Score in the Trail Making Test
through study completion, an average of 10 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Green
EXPERIMENTALGreen exercise participants will exercise in the nature-based condition.
Indoor
EXPERIMENTALIndoor participants will exercise in the indoor condition.
Interventions
The participants will execute a 12-exercise High Intensity Circuit Training protocol. Each exercise will have an active part taking 30 seconds, in which exercisers are encouraged to do as many repetitions as possible, and a resting part taking 10 seconds in which the participants rest and are informed of the next exercise. Before and after the 12-exercise routine, the participants rate their affect, arousal and perceived exertion, while using a heart rate monitor and two IMU sensors on their arms and legs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Fit for engaging in intense physical activity according to a physician.
You may not qualify if:
- Participating in another research project at the same time.
- Unable to perform the proposed exercises due to physical impairment.
- Taking medication or being under medical treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana
Cruz Quebrada, Oeiras, 1499-002, Portugal
Related Publications (22)
Lahart I, Darcy P, Gidlow C, Calogiuri G. The Effects of Green Exercise on Physical and Mental Wellbeing: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 15;16(8):1352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081352.
PMID: 30991724BACKGROUNDThompson Coon J, Boddy K, Stein K, Whear R, Barton J, Depledge MH. Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Mar 1;45(5):1761-72. doi: 10.1021/es102947t. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
PMID: 21291246BACKGROUNDBowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Knight TM, Pullin AS. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 4;10:456. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456.
PMID: 20684754BACKGROUNDByrka, K., & Ryczko, N. (2018). Positive effects of dancing in natural versus indoor settings: The mediating role of engagement in physical activity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 57, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.06.002
BACKGROUNDRogerson M, Barton J. Effects of the Visual Exercise Environments on Cognitive Directed Attention, Energy Expenditure and Perceived Exertion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jun 30;12(7):7321-36. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120707321.
PMID: 26133125BACKGROUNDSlapsinskaite, A., Garcia, S., Razon, S., Balague, N., Hristovski, R., & Tenenbaum, G. (2016). Cycling outdoors facilitates external thoughts and endurance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 27, 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.08.002
BACKGROUNDAraújo, D., Brymer, E., Brito, H., Withagen, R., & Davids, K. (2019). The empowering variability of affordances of nature: Why do exercisers feel better after performing the same exercise in natural environments than in indoor environments? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.020
BACKGROUNDExel J, Mateus N, Goncalves B, Abrantes C, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Sampaio J. Entropy Measures Can Add Novel Information to Reveal How Runners' Heart Rate and Speed Are Regulated by Different Environments. Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01278. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31214084BACKGROUNDMoras G, Fernandez-Valdes B, Vazquez-Guerrero J, Tous-Fajardo J, Exel J, Sampaio J. Entropy measures detect increased movement variability in resistance training when elite rugby players use the ball. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Dec;21(12):1286-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 24.
PMID: 29804653BACKGROUNDKlika, B., & Jordan, C. (2013). High-intensity circuit training using body weight: maximum Results With Minimal Investment. ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, 17(3), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1249/FIT.0b013e31828cb1e8
BACKGROUNDSilva RA, Rogers K, Buckley TJ. Advancing Environmental Epidemiology to Assess the Beneficial Influence of the Natural Environment on Human Health and Well-Being. Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Sep 4;52(17):9545-9555. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01781. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
PMID: 30064205BACKGROUNDFlowers, E. P., Freeman, P., & Gladwell, V. F. (2018). Enhancing the acute psychological benefits of green exercise: An investigation of expectancy effects. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 39, 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.014
BACKGROUNDJang, S., & So, W.-Y. (2017). The effect of short-term outdoor taekwondo training on the concentration and mood of taekwondo players. Journal of Men's Health, 13(2), e68-e75. https://doi.org/10.22374/1875-6859.13.2.9
BACKGROUNDNiedermeier M, Grafetstatter C, Hartl A, Kopp M. A Randomized Crossover Trial on Acute Stress-Related Physiological Responses to Mountain Hiking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 11;14(8):905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080905.
PMID: 28800067BACKGROUNDShanahan DF, Franco L, Lin BB, Gaston KJ, Fuller RA. The Benefits of Natural Environments for Physical Activity. Sports Med. 2016 Jul;46(7):989-95. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0502-4.
PMID: 26886475BACKGROUNDBrymer E, Araujo D, Davids K, Pepping GJ. Conceptualizing the Human Health Outcomes of Acting in Natural Environments: An Ecological Perspective. Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01362. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32765336BACKGROUNDDonnelly AA, MacIntyre TE, O'Sullivan N, Warrington G, Harrison AJ, Igou ER, Jones M, Gidlow C, Brick N, Lahart I, Cloak R, Lane AM. Environmental Influences on Elite Sport Athletes Well Being: From Gold, Silver, and Bronze to Blue Green and Gold. Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 4;7:1167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01167. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27540370BACKGROUNDCollins, L., & Brymer, E. (2020). Understanding nature sports: a participant centred perspective and its implications for the design and facilitating of learning and performance. Annals of Leisure Research, 23(1), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2018.1525302
BACKGROUNDReich AH, Queathem EJ. Setting, Age, and Intensity Influence Responses to Exercise in Young Endurance Runners. Percept Mot Skills. 2020 Jun;127(3):533-554. doi: 10.1177/0031512520903907. Epub 2020 Feb 9. No abstract available.
PMID: 32036749BACKGROUNDHutchinson, J. C., & Tenenbaum, G. (2007). Attention focus during physical effort: The mediating role of task intensity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(2), 233-245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.006
BACKGROUNDLind E, Welch AS, Ekkekakis P. Do 'mind over muscle' strategies work? Examining the effects of attentional association and dissociation on exertional, affective and physiological responses to exercise. Sports Med. 2009;39(9):743-64. doi: 10.2165/11315120-000000000-00000.
PMID: 19691364BACKGROUNDBrito H, Lopes H, Vaz de Carvalho M, Carrilho D, Carvalho A, Araujo D. The effects of nature-based vs. indoor settings on the adaptability, performance and affect of calisthenics exercisers. A registered report. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2024 Jul;73:102626. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102626. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
PMID: 38492765DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Henrique Brito, MSc
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Participants will not be informed of the opposite group details, and it is not expected that they meet other participants during the meeting or intervention periods.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2021
First Posted
October 22, 2021
Study Start
October 15, 2022
Primary Completion
November 30, 2023
Study Completion
January 20, 2024
Last Updated
March 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data available indefinitely.
- Access Criteria
- Open access
plan available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029224000372