Migration Rates of Sutured vs Non-sutured Esophageal Stent Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
No standard approach currently exists for endoscopic esophageal stent placement, and both sutured and un-sutured techniques are employed for esophageal stent placement currently. The primary purpose of this study is to find out if suture fixation of esophageal stents is superior to non-suture fixated stent placement. Consecutive patients who are scheduled for esophageal stent placement will be identified as potential study participants by study personnel and will be approached on the day of the procedure. Informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized into suture fixation and non-suture fixation groups. Patients in the suture fixation group will have their esophageal stent secured in location with two endoscopic sutures. Those in the non-suture fixation group will have no sutures placed. Main study outcome is stent migration, and rates of stent migration will be compared in the two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2023
CompletedApril 23, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.7 years
October 6, 2021
April 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite of stent migration or total stent dislodgement
Stent migration will be defined as stent displacement of 20 mm or more from initial chest Xray. 20 mm has been taken as reference due to some fore-shortening that is expected with the stents, and to account for angulation and measurement related inter-radiograph variability. Inability to locate stent on chest radiograph or Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) will be defined as total stent dislodgement, which will be analyzed separately as well as included in the composite outcome.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Total stent dislodgement
4 weeks
Stent Migration
4 weeks
Technical success
4 weeks
Adverse events
3 months
Length of procedure
4 weeks
Other Outcomes (2)
Cost of procedure
3 months
Dysphagia
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Suture arm
EXPERIMENTALEsophageal stent will be placed in standard of care fashion by the endoscopists using standard gastroscopes. After esophageal stent placement, endoscopic suturing will be performed in cases of patients randomized to suture fixation.
Non-suture
PLACEBO COMPARATOREsophageal stent will be placed in standard of care fashion by the endoscopists using standard gastroscopes. No sutures will be placed to fixate the stent
Interventions
Esophageal stent will be placed in the standard of care fashion by the endoscopists using standard gastroscopes. Covered self-expanding metal stent will be placed as per endoscopist preference. After esophageal stent placement, endoscopic suturing will be performed in cases of patients randomized to suture fixation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to provide informed consent
- Indication for esophageal stent placement
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of any contraindication to esophageal stent placement
- Incarceration
- Inability to tolerate anesthesia
- Pregnant status
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26508, United States
Related Publications (1)
Singh S, Maan S, Hadi Y, Agrawal R, Adekolu AA, Cohen EM, Ali FS, Fang W, Markovich B, Krafft M, Thakkar S. Endoscopic suturing to prevent migration of esophageal fully covered self-expandable metal stents: a randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Oct;102(4):525-535.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.037. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
PMID: 40024292DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shailendra Singh
West Virginia University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arunkumar Krishnan
West Virginia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor & Director, Bariatric Endoscopy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2021
First Posted
October 19, 2021
Study Start
July 20, 2021
Primary Completion
March 15, 2023
Study Completion
March 15, 2023
Last Updated
April 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share