The SAVVY Guidewire in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures
SAVVY
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
TAVR patients exhibiting post-procedural residual AR had higher mortality and hospitalization rates due to heart failure, with the extent of this association increasing proportionally to the severity of the regurgitation. Optimizing transcatheter valve performance by intra-procedural hemodynamic evaluation of AR and residual transvalvular gradient remains of high clinical importance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 28, 2021
CompletedJanuary 18, 2022
January 1, 2022
3 months
September 21, 2021
January 14, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Presence of Major complications
Presence of major complications related to the SAVVY guidewire including (i) guidewire kink hindering or preventing the advancement of the transcatheter valve system
Periprocedural
Presence of Major vascular complications
Major vascular complications related to the SAVVY guidewire are defined as stroke, bleeding or left ventricular perforation
Periprocedural
Number of transcatheter valve malpositioning
Pacing capture failure translating into valve malpositioning. Valve malpositiong will be evaluated by a landing site to low or too high, leading to hemodynamically unfavorable results.
Periprocedural
Number of valve embolization
Pacing capture failure translating into valve embolization
Periprocedural
Number of effective rapid pacing run
Effective rapid pacing will be defined as an adequate ventricular pacing capture for a minimum of 10 seconds, with no capture loss, and leading to a reduction of aortic pressure of at least 50%, with/or a systolic pressure value \<60 mmHg. Efficacy will be assessed by the physician.
Periprocedural
Number of accurate ventricular pressure
Accurate ventricular pressure will be defines as a pressure wire measurements similar (differences \<5 mmHg) to those obtained simultaneously with a pigtail catheter in the same cavity or vascular segment (differences \<5 mmHg in SBP, differences \<5 mmHg in LVEDP).
Periprocedural
Study Arms (1)
Guidewire
EXPERIMENTALThe SAVVY guidewire will be used in all TAVR procedures of patients included in the study
Interventions
The SAVVY guidewire will be used for rapid pacing runs, valve delivery and for left ventricular pressure measurements pre- and post-THV deployment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing a TAVR procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Failure to provide signed informed consent.
- Extremely calcified aortic valve (Agatston score \>3000 AU)
- Extremely horizontal aorta.
- Severe septal hypertrophy (interventricular septum \>15 mm as measured by TTE).
- Extreme tortuosity at the level of the iliofemoral arteries, thoracic or abdominal aorta.
- Prohibitive surgical risk precluding (according to the Heart Team) conversion to open heart surgery in case of a life threatening complication.
- Young patients (\<18 Years) and pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
ICM
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada
IUCPQ
Québec, G1V 4G5, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Fleisher LA, Jneid H, Mack MJ, McLeod CJ, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017 Jun 20;135(25):e1159-e1195. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000503. Epub 2017 Mar 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 28298458BACKGROUNDPopma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O'Hair D, Bajwa T, Heiser JC, Merhi W, Kleiman NS, Askew J, Sorajja P, Rovin J, Chetcuti SJ, Adams DH, Teirstein PS, Zorn GL 3rd, Forrest JK, Tchetche D, Resar J, Walton A, Piazza N, Ramlawi B, Robinson N, Petrossian G, Gleason TG, Oh JK, Boulware MJ, Qiao H, Mugglin AS, Reardon MJ; Evolut Low Risk Trial Investigators. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
PMID: 30883053BACKGROUNDMack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, Russo M, Kapadia SR, Malaisrie SC, Cohen DJ, Pibarot P, Leipsic J, Hahn RT, Blanke P, Williams MR, McCabe JM, Brown DL, Babaliaros V, Goldman S, Szeto WY, Genereux P, Pershad A, Pocock SJ, Alu MC, Webb JG, Smith CR; PARTNER 3 Investigators. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
PMID: 30883058BACKGROUNDGenereux P, Head SJ, Hahn R, Daneault B, Kodali S, Williams MR, van Mieghem NM, Alu MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Leon MB. Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the new Achilles' heel? A comprehensive review of the literature. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 19;61(11):1125-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1039. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
PMID: 23375925BACKGROUNDAthappan G, Patvardhan E, Tuzcu EM, Svensson LG, Lemos PA, Fraccaro C, Tarantini G, Sinning JM, Nickenig G, Capodanno D, Tamburino C, Latib A, Colombo A, Kapadia SR. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 16;61(15):1585-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.047.
PMID: 23500308BACKGROUNDNishimura RA, Carabello BA. Hemodynamics in the cardiac catheterization laboratory of the 21st century. Circulation. 2012 May 1;125(17):2138-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.060319. No abstract available.
PMID: 22547754BACKGROUNDPibarot P, Hahn RT, Weissman NJ, Monaghan MJ. Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):340-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.008.
PMID: 25772838BACKGROUNDLiao YB, Deng XX, Meng Y, Zhao ZG, Xiong TY, Meng XJ, Zuo ZL, Li YJ, Cao JY, Xu YN, Chen M, Feng Y. Predictors and outcome of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EuroIntervention. 2017 Apr 20;12(17):2067-2074. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00254.
PMID: 27890858BACKGROUNDKamioka N, Wells J, Keegan P, Lerakis S, Binongo J, Corrigan F, Condado J, Patel A, Forcillo J, Ogburn L, Dong A, Caughron H, Simone A, Leshnower B, Devireddy C, Mavromatis K, Guyton R, Stewart J, Thourani V, Block PC, Babaliaros V. Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Next-Day Discharge After Minimalist Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.021.
PMID: 29348004BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2021
First Posted
October 18, 2021
Study Start
October 8, 2021
Primary Completion
December 28, 2021
Study Completion
December 28, 2021
Last Updated
January 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share