NCT05068063

Brief Summary

An adequate balance between analgesia and motor function is an essential requirement to facilitate functional recovery and early discharge after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Proximal nerve blocks (i.e. femoral and sciatic nerve blocks) are associated with optimal analgesia, but they can cause muscle weakness, interfering with rehabilitation and increasing the risk of falls . A recent randomized controlled trial concluded that, compared to mid-and distal ACB, a distal femoral triangle block (FTB) is associated with lower opioid consumption and improved postoperative analgesia for ambulatory ACL reconstruction. In ACL reconstruction surgery there are other potential sources of pain not covered by a FTB, such as intra-articular structures (menisci, cruciate ligaments), posterior knee capsule and the graft donor site. Evidence supporting the addition of an IPACK block to a FTB has been studied for patients undergoing total knee replacement, nonetheless, there is no trial analyzing the analgesic contribution of IPACK to a FTB in the context of ACL reconstruction surgery. In this multicentric trial, the investigators set out to analyze the analgesic benefit of adding an IPACK block to a FTB.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 15, 2021

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 5, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 15, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

nerve blockIPACKfemoral triangle

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative pain scores at 2 hours of arrival to Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

    Pain evaluated during knee flexion in Numeric Rating Score from 0 to 10 points

    2 hours after arrival to PACU

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Post-operative static pain scores at 0 hours of arrival to PACU

    0 hours after arrival to PACU

  • Post-operative static pain scores at PACU discharge

    at discharge of PACU up to 2 hours postoperatively

  • Post-operative static pain scores at 6 hours of arrival to PACU

    6 hours after arrival to PACU

  • Post-operative static pain scores at 12 hours of arrival to PACU

    12 hours after arrival to PACU

  • Post-operative static pain scores at 24 hours of arrival to PACU

    24 hours after arrival to PACU

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Femoral Triangle + IPACK block

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to receive a combination of femoral triangle block and active IPACK block

Drug: Bupivacaine Injection

Femoral Triangle block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized to receive a combination of femoral triangle block and sham IPACK block

Drug: normal Saline

Interventions

Ultrasound-guided Femoral Triangle block with 20 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25% and IPACK block with 20 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%

Femoral Triangle + IPACK block

Ultrasound-guided Femoral Triangle block with 20 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25% and IPACK block with 20 mL of normal saline 0.9%

Femoral Triangle block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient scheduled to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under general anesthesia with ipsilateral autologous graft.
  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
  • Body mass index between 19 and 35 (kg/m2)

You may not qualify if:

  • Adults who are unable to give their own consent
  • Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination)
  • Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
  • Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
  • Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
  • Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs), morphine or tramadol
  • Pregnancy
  • ACL revision surgery
  • Contralateral graft or any type of allograft
  • Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Clinica Alemana de Santiago

Santiago, RM, Chile

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING

Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile

Santiago, RM, Chile

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

  • Wilde J, Bedi A, Altchek DW. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health. 2014 Nov;6(6):504-18. doi: 10.1177/1941738113500910.

    PMID: 25364483BACKGROUND
  • Sharma S, Iorio R, Specht LM, Davies-Lepie S, Healy WL. Complications of femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):135-40. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1025-1. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

    PMID: 19680735BACKGROUND
  • Abdallah FW, Whelan DB, Chan VW, Prasad GA, Endersby RV, Theodoropolous J, Oldfield S, Oh J, Brull R. Adductor Canal Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia and Superior Quadriceps Strength Compared with Femoral Nerve Block in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Anesthesiology. 2016 May;124(5):1053-64. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001045.

    PMID: 26938989BACKGROUND
  • Abdallah FW, Mejia J, Prasad GA, Moga R, Chahal J, Theodoropulos J, Dwyer T, Brull R. Opioid- and Motor-sparing with Proximal, Mid-, and Distal Locations for Adductor Canal Block in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2019 Sep;131(3):619-629. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002817.

    PMID: 31246607BACKGROUND
  • Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Pedersen EM, Borglum J. Redefining the adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):442-3. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000119. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25140514BACKGROUND
  • Johnston DF, Sondekoppam RV, Uppal V, Litchfield R, Giffin R, Ganapathy S. Effect of combining peri-hamstring injection or anterior obturator nerve block on the analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;124(3):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.11.032. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

    PMID: 31980156BACKGROUND
  • Johnston DF, Black ND, Cowden R, Turbitt L, Taylor S. Spread of dye injectate in the distal femoral triangle versus the distal adductor canal: a cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan;44(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000002.

    PMID: 30640651BACKGROUND
  • Chan E, Howle R, Onwochei D, Desai N. Infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee (IPACK) block in knee surgery: a narrative review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Sep;46(9):784-805. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102681. Epub 2021 May 14.

    PMID: 33990439BACKGROUND
  • Bushnell BD, Sakryd G, Noonan TJ. Hamstring donor-site block: evaluation of pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010 Jul;26(7):894-900. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 May 13.

    PMID: 20620788BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAcute PainPain, PostoperativeKnee Injuries

Interventions

BupivacaineSaline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and InjuriesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic Processes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Officials

  • Andrea Gonzalez, MD

    Clinica Alemana de Santiago

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Sebastian L Layera, MD

CONTACT

Julian Aliste, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2021

First Posted

October 5, 2021

Study Start

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion

September 30, 2022

Study Completion

October 15, 2022

Last Updated

June 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations