Paracervical Block Versus Transcervical Block in Outpatient Procedural Hysteroscopy
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Different Types of Local Anesthesia in Outpatient Procedural Hysteroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
242
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive, diagnostic and therapeutic gynecological surgical technique and the gold standard in the study of the uterine cavity. Thanks to the decrease in the diameter of hysteroscopes and to the vaginoscopic approach, anesthesia is no longer necessary in diagnostic hysteroscopy. Nevertheless, in operative hysteroscopy, given the instrumentalization and the need of cervical dilation, the use of local anesthesia, with or without sedation, is recommended. The different alternatives described in the literature are the following:
- 1.Cervical/ intracervical block: injection of local anesthetic into the four quadrants of the cervix.
- 2.Paracervical block: injection of local anesthetic in the cervicovaginal junction at 5 and 7 o'clock positions.
- 3.Transcervical (uterine) anesthesia: instillation of a local anesthetic agent via catheter through the cervix and into the uterine cavity.
- 4.Topical cervical anesthesia: application of local anesthetic in gel or spray to the cervix.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedAugust 1, 2023
June 1, 2023
1 year
June 19, 2023
July 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To assess the best anesthetic pathway to decrease pain during outpatient hysteroscopy
comparing 10 point visual analogue scale (from 0 to 10 points) between two groups of patients recieving Bupivacaine administrated through a paracervical block versus a transcervical block
during hysteroscopy
To assess the best anesthetic pathway to decrease pain during outpatient hysteroscopy
comparing 10 point visual analogue scale (from 0 to 10 points) between two groups of patients recieving Bupivacaine administrated through a paracervical block versus a transcervical block
15 minutes post hysteroscopy
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Compare the pain experience based on the visual analogue scale between pre and post-menopausal patients
during hysteroscopy
Compare the pain experience based on the visual analogue scale between pre and post-menopausal patients
15 minutes post hysteroscopy
Compare the pain experience based on the visual analogue scale between nulliparous and parous patients
during hysteroscopy
Compare the pain experience based on the visual analogue scale between nulliparous and parous patients
15 minutes post hysteroscopy
To evaluate the need for an extra intravenous sedative dose.
during hysteroscopy
Study Arms (2)
Paracervical block
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10cc Bupivacaine 1% at 0.5-1 cm depth of the cervicovaginal junction at 5 and 7 o'clock positions (20cc in total).
Transcervical block
EXPERIMENTAL10cc Bupivacaine 1% through the endocervix using an 17-gauge epidural catheter
Interventions
evaluation of pain by using two different types of local anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients
- years of age or older
- Indication of outpatient surgical hysteroscopy for polypectomy and myomectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Women under 18 years old
- Unable to understand how to score a visual analog scale pain score
- Hysteroscopy contraindication
- Patients with medical history or current status that makes outpatient procedure usafe
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Montreal East, Quebec, H1T 2M4, Canada
Related Publications (14)
Readman E, Maher PJ. Pain relief and outpatient hysteroscopy: a literature review. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Aug;11(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60042-4.
PMID: 15559340BACKGROUNDLau WC, Tam WH, Lo WK, Yuen PM. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of transcervical intrauterine local anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG. 2000 May;107(5):610-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13301.x.
PMID: 10826574BACKGROUNDDe Silva PM, Mahmud A, Smith PP, Clark TJ. Analgesia for Office Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jul-Aug;27(5):1034-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
PMID: 31982584BACKGROUNDBettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Feb;4(2):255-8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(97)80019-9.
PMID: 9050737BACKGROUNDCicinelli E, Didonna T, Ambrosi G, Schonauer LM, Fiore G, Matteo MG. Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Mar;104(3):316-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11460.x.
PMID: 9091008BACKGROUNDLau WC, Lo WK, Tam WH, Yuen PM. Paracervical anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr;106(4):356-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08274.x.
PMID: 10426243BACKGROUNDZupi E, Luciano AA, Valli E, Marconi D, Maneschi F, Romanini C. The use of topical anesthesia in diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1995 Feb;63(2):414-6.
PMID: 7843454BACKGROUNDBroadbent JA, Hill NC, Molnar BG, Rolfe KJ, Magos AL. Randomized placebo controlled trial to assess the role of intracervical lignocaine in outpatient hysteroscopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Sep;99(9):777-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13886.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 1420022BACKGROUNDCooper NA, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Local anaesthesia for pain control during outpatient hysteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c1130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1130.
PMID: 20332307BACKGROUNDKosus N, Kosus A, Guler A, Simavli SA, Turhan NO. Transcervical intrauterine levobupivacaine infusion or paracervical block for pain control during endometrial biopsy. Exp Ther Med. 2012 Apr;3(4):683-688. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.463. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
PMID: 22969951BACKGROUNDGuida M, Pellicano M, Zullo F, Acunzo G, Lavitola G, Palomba S, Nappi C. Outpatient operative hysteroscopy with bipolar electrode: a prospective multicentre randomized study between local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Hum Reprod. 2003 Apr;18(4):840-3. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg075.
PMID: 12660281BACKGROUNDHawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
PMID: 22588748BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.
PMID: 3785962BACKGROUNDChudnoff S, Einstein M, Levie M. Paracervical block efficacy in office hysteroscopic sterilization: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;115(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c51ace.
PMID: 20027030BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mélissa Roy, MD
OB-GYN
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2023
First Posted
August 1, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is not a plan to make IPD available