NCT06195423

Brief Summary

By 2040, 25% of Canadians will have osteoarthritis, a disabling joint condition. Most people think osteoarthritis only affects older adults, but 50% of the 700,000 Canadian youth who hurt their knee playing sports annually will develop osteoarthritis by 40 years of age. These young people with old knees face knee pain and disability for much of their adult lives, interfering with parenting, work, and recreation. Yet, most do not know about osteoarthritis or how to reduce their risk. In this clinical trial, people who have torn the Anterior Cruciate ligament in their knee and had reconstruction surgery 9-36 months previously will be randomized to receive either a 6-month virtual education and exercise therapy program called Stop OsteoARthritis (SOAR) or a minimal intervention control program. Researchers will test if those who received the SOAR program have larger gains in knee health, including pain, symptoms, function, and quality of life at 6, 12, and 24 months. Researchers will also use MRIs (baseline and 24 months) to assess how the SOAR program influences knee cartilage degeneration and its cost-effectiveness.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
32mo left

Started May 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress43%
May 2024Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 22, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2024

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2026

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2028

Last Updated

May 10, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

December 22, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Randomized controlled trialPost-traumatic osteoarthritisKneeOsteoarthritis preventionExerciseRehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Self-reported knee-related pain, symptoms, function in sport and quality of life over 6 months (effectiveness outcome) (ACL tear participants)

    Patient partners identify pain, function and quality of life, which can be impaired up to 10-years post-ACLR, as priority outcomes. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) with sub-scales for knee pain (9-items), other symptoms (7-items), function in daily living (ADL; 17-items), function in sport/recreation (5-items), and quality of life (4-items) across injury and OA populations. Each subscale item is scored on a 5-point scale and individual subscale items summed and transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating better outcome. The KOOS4 which is an average of 4 sub-scales (excluding ADL) is a recommended and accepted primary outcome for ACLR RCTs and was responsive in our proof of concept RCT.

    Change from baseline KOOS score at 6 months (ACL tear participants)

  • Incremental cost-utility ratio over 6 months (efficiency outcome)

    To assess SOARs value for money (health systems perspective) we will estimate the incremental cost/mean change in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) gained by SOAR versus CONTROL at 6 months. Costs will be estimated with the Health Resource Utilization questionnaire (HRU) as the study population often uses resources not captured in administrative data and evidence of good agreement between administrative and prospectively collected HRU data. The HRU captures provider visits, hospital admissions, lab and diagnostic tests and medication use. QALYs will be estimated from health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) using area under the curve analysis. The EQ-5D-5L is widely used for cost-utility analyses in OA, and assesses 5 levels across 5 health domains to produce a health state profile using Canadian conversion tariffs.

    Incremental cost-utility ratio at 6 months

  • Provider adoption of SOAR over 6 months (implementation outcome) (physiotherapist participants)

    A 40-item fidelity checklist, refined in our proof-of-concept RCT, will be applied to all video-recorded 1:1 counseling sessions for 4 participants per PT, and the median % fidelity for each PT and checklist item reported. Items reaching ≤70% will be identified and inform the development of PT training modules to facilitate future evaluation and implementation.

    Percent fidelity at 6 months (physiotherapist participants)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Patient Acceptable Symptom State over 6 months (ACL tear participants)

    Change from baseline patient acceptable symptom state score at 6 months (ACL tear participants)

  • Self-reported perceived self-management over 6 months (ACL tear participants)

    Change from baseline self-reported perceived self-management at 6 months (ACL tear participants)

  • Osteoarthritis MRI features over 24 months (ACL tear participants)

    Change from baseline MRI at 24 months (ACL tear participants)

  • Health resource use costs over 24 months

    Health resource use costs over 24 months

  • Intervention delivery costs over 6 months

    Intervention delivery costs over 6 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (36)

  • Self-reported knee-related pain, symptoms, function in sport and quality of life over 12 months (ACL tear participants)

    Change from baseline KOOS score at 12 months (ACL tear participants)

  • Self-reported knee-related pain, symptoms, function in sport and quality of life over 24 months (ACL tear participants)

    Change from baseline KOOS score at 24 months (ACL tear participants)

  • Incremental cost-utility ratio over 12 months

    Incremental cost-utility ratio at 12 months

  • +33 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Stop OsteoARthritis (SOAR) program

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with a first-time ACL tear followed by reconstruction surgery randomized to the SOAR program group will complete a 6-month SOAR program (one-time Knee Camp, weekly home-based exercise therapy and physical activity with tracking, weekly 1:1 physiotherapist counseling sessions, and optional weekly group-based exercise classes) Consented trained physiotherapists will deliver the SOAR program throughout the study period to one or more SOAR program participants. Physiotherapists and SOAR participants will be randomly paired.

Behavioral: Stop OsteoARthritis (SOAR) program

Living Well after ACLR

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants with a first-time ACL tear followed by reconstruction surgery randomized to the minimal control (Living Well after ACLR) group will complete a 6-month minimal intervention control program (educational video, workbook, activity tracking, and one 1:1 physiotherapist counseling session).

Behavioral: Living Well after ACLR program

Interventions

The SOAR program is a 6-month, online-delivered (videoconferencing), PT-guided knee health program which consists of; 1. Knee Camp: Includes interactive education, and 1:1 physiotherapy knee exam and counseling session to co-identify home-based exercise-therapy and physical activity goals to address participants' unique functional limitations. Participants are given a wrist-worn activity monitor to wear 24hours/day. 2. Individualized Weekly Home-based Exercise-Therapy and Physical Activity Program: At home, participants work to meet their exercise-therapy and physical activity goals. Exercises and physical activity are tracked with an online form and the activity monitor. Participants can also attend an optional weekly group class. 3. Weekly PT-guided Exercise-Therapy and Physical Activity Counselling: Each week, participants attend a 1:1 physiotherapist counseling session to modify exercise-therapy and physical activity goals.

Also known as: SOAR
Stop OsteoARthritis (SOAR) program

Participants in the minimal intervention CONTROL group will receive access to a 30-minute educational video (knee anatomy, ACLR information, general exercise, physical activity, and goal-setting principles), a best practice workbook, one video-recorded virtual session with a physiotherapist (naïve to SOAR) who will explain the booklet and answer questions but not volunteer information beyond the video or booklet and the same wrist-worn activity tracker as the experimental group.

Also known as: CONTROL
Living Well after ACLR

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Currently live in British Columbia, Canada
  • years of age (inclusive)
  • months past a first-time ACLR performed ≤12-months of first-time ACL tear
  • Currently not receiving knee care from a health or fitness provider and have no scheduled surgical procedures (any part of the body) that would interfere with exercise during the study.
  • Score below a KOOS4 PASS (\<79 points)
  • Have daily access to an email address and a computer with internet
  • Are willing to wear an activity tracker during the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to communicate in English
  • No medical attention (healthcare provider) time-loss (missed physical activity, sport or work ≥2 occasions) injury to the ACLR knee before the ACL tear
  • Previous physician diagnosis of index knee osteoarthritis
  • Inflammatory arthritis or other systemic condition
  • Lower limb injury, surgery, or intra-articular injection in the past 6-months
  • Current pregnancy
  • MRI contraindications (i.e., Weight over 400 lbs (MRI machine limit); Pacemaker or any other implanted medical device (i.e., wires, defibrillator, artificial heart valve, an electronic device like a drug infusion pump, electrical stimulator for nerves or bones, coil, catheter, or filter in any blood vessel, ear or eye implant, or stainless steel intrauterine device (IUD); Brain or ferromagnetic aneurysm clip; any other metallic prostheses or shrapnel, bullets, or other metal fragments; injury where a piece of metal lodged in the eye or orbit, or; surgery, medical procedure or tattoos (including tattooed eyeliner) in the last 6 weeks).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Arthritis Research Canada

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Y 3P2, Canada

RECRUITING

Sea to Sky Orthopaedics

Whistler, British Columbia, V8E 1A6, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (45)

  • Bombardier C, Hawker G, Mosher D. The Impact of Arthritis in Canada: Today and Over the Next 30 Years. Arthritis Alliance of Canada. Fall 2011.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ackerman IN, Bohensky MA, Zomer E, Tacey M, Gorelik A, Brand CA, de Steiger R. The projected burden of primary total knee and hip replacement for osteoarthritis in Australia to the year 2030. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 23;20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2411-9.

    PMID: 30797228BACKGROUND
  • Sharif B, Kopec JA, Wong H, Anis AH. Distribution and Drivers of Average Direct Cost of Osteoarthritis in Canada From 2003 to 2010. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Feb;69(2):243-251. doi: 10.1002/acr.22933.

    PMID: 27159532BACKGROUND
  • Hunter DJ, Schofield D, Callander E. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;10(7):437-41. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.44. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

    PMID: 24662640BACKGROUND
  • Sharif B, Garner R, Sanmartin C, Flanagan WM, Hennessy D, Marshall DA. Risk of work loss due to illness or disability in patients with osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 May;55(5):861-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev428. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

    PMID: 26759430BACKGROUND
  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.

    PMID: 22310560BACKGROUND
  • Tugwell P, Bennett KJ, Sackett DL, Haynes RB. The measurement iterative loop: a framework for the critical appraisal of need, benefits and costs of health interventions. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(4):339-51. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90080-3.

    PMID: 3923014BACKGROUND
  • Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):331-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907797.

    PMID: 20660401BACKGROUND
  • Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88.

    PMID: 9699158BACKGROUND
  • Runhaar J, Schiphof D, van Meer B, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Oei EH. How to define subregional osteoarthritis progression using semi-quantitative MRI osteoarthritis knee score (MOAKS). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Oct;22(10):1533-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.022.

    PMID: 25278062BACKGROUND
  • Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Lo GH, Grainger AJ, Conaghan PG, Boudreau RM, Roemer FW. Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Aug;19(8):990-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 May 23.

    PMID: 21645627BACKGROUND
  • Truong LK, Mosewich AD, Miciak M, Pajkic A, Silvester-Lee T, Li LC, Whittaker JL. "I feel I'm leading the charge." Experiences of a virtual physiotherapist-guided knee health program for persons at-risk of osteoarthritis after a sport-related knee injury. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022 Dec 27;5(1):100333. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100333. eCollection 2023 Mar.

    PMID: 36685259BACKGROUND
  • Whittaker JL, Truong LK, Silvester-Lee T, Losciale JM, Miciak M, Pajkic A, Le CY, Hoens AM, Mosewich AD, Hunt MA, Li LC, Roos EM. Feasibility of the SOAR (Stop OsteoARthritis) program. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022 Jan 28;4(1):100239. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100239. eCollection 2022 Mar.

    PMID: 36474472BACKGROUND
  • Whittaker JL, Truong LK, Losciale JM, Silvester-Lee T, Miciak M, Pajkic A, Le CY, Hoens AM, Mosewich A, Hunt MA, Li LC, Roos EM. Efficacy of the SOAR knee health program: protocol for a two-arm stepped-wedge randomized delayed-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 25;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05019-z.

    PMID: 35078446BACKGROUND
  • Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 6;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.

    PMID: 20053272BACKGROUND
  • Collins NJ, Prinsen CA, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Aug;24(8):1317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

    PMID: 27012756BACKGROUND
  • Culvenor AG, West TJ, Bruder AM, Scholes MJ, Barton CJ, Roos EM, Oei E, McPhail SM, Souza RB, Lee J, Patterson BE, Girdwood MA, Couch JL, Crossley KM. SUpervised exercise-therapy and Patient Education Rehabilitation (SUPER) versus minimal intervention for young adults at risk of knee osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction: SUPER-Knee randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e068279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068279.

    PMID: 36657757BACKGROUND
  • Roos EM, Boyle E, Frobell RB, Lohmander LS, Ingelsrud LH. It is good to feel better, but better to feel good: whether a patient finds treatment 'successful' or not depends on the questions researchers ask. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;53(23):1474-1478. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100260. Epub 2019 May 9.

    PMID: 31072841BACKGROUND
  • Whittaker JL, Toomey CM, Nettel-Aguirre A, Jaremko JL, Doyle-Baker PK, Woodhouse LJ, Emery CA. Health-related Outcomes after a Youth Sport-related Knee Injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Feb;51(2):255-263. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001787.

    PMID: 30239493BACKGROUND
  • Whittaker JL, Culvenor AG, Juhl CB, Berg B, Bricca A, Filbay SR, Holm P, Macri E, Urhausen AP, Ardern CL, Bruder AM, Bullock GS, Ezzat AM, Girdwood M, Haberfield M, Hughes M, Ingelsrud LH, Khan KM, Le CY, Losciale JM, Lundberg M, Miciak M, Oiestad BE, Patterson B, Raisanen AM, Skou ST, Thorlund JB, Toomey C, Truong LK, Meer BLV, West TJ, Young JJ, Lohmander LS, Emery C, Risberg MA, van Middelkoop M, Roos EM, Crossley KM. OPTIKNEE 2022: consensus recommendations to optimise knee health after traumatic knee injury to prevent osteoarthritis. Br J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;56(24):1393-1405. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106299. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

    PMID: 36379676BACKGROUND
  • Smith D, Harvey P, Lawn S, Harris M, Battersby M. Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale. Qual Life Res. 2017 Jan;26(1):149-159. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1368-5. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

    PMID: 27432251BACKGROUND
  • Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Schomberg A, Stabler M. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997 Aug;77(8):820-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.8.820.

    PMID: 9256870BACKGROUND
  • Thomee P, Wahrborg P, Borjesson M, Thomee R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J. Self-efficacy, symptoms and physical activity in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007 Jun;17(3):238-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00557.x. Epub 2006 Jun 15.

    PMID: 16774652BACKGROUND
  • Ezzat AM, Whittaker JL, Brussoni M, Masse L, Emery CA. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the knee self-efficacy scale. Clinical journal of Sport Medicine. 2019;29(3):e57-58.

    BACKGROUND
  • Miller RP, Kori S, Todd D. The Tampa Scale: a measure of kinesiophobia. Clinical Journal of Pain. 1991;7(1):51-52.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L. Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Jul;13(5):393-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8. Epub 2005 Feb 10.

    PMID: 15703963BACKGROUND
  • Undheim MB, Cosgrave C, King E, Strike S, Marshall B, Falvey E, Franklyn-Miller A. Isokinetic muscle strength and readiness to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is there an association? A systematic review and a protocol recommendation. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(20):1305-10. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093962. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

    PMID: 26105017BACKGROUND
  • Amireault S, Godin G. The Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire: validity evidence supporting its use for classifying healthy adults into active and insufficiently active categories. Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Apr;120(2):604-22. doi: 10.2466/03.27.PMS.120v19x7. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

    PMID: 25799030BACKGROUND
  • Toomey CM, Whittaker JL, Nettel-Aguirre A, Reimer RA, Woodhouse LJ, Ghali B, Doyle-Baker PK, Emery CA. Higher Fat Mass Is Associated With a History of Knee Injury in Youth Sport. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Feb;47(2):80-87. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7101.

    PMID: 28142363BACKGROUND
  • Cleveland RJ, Alvarez C, Schwartz TA, Losina E, Renner JB, Jordan JM, Callahan LF. The impact of painful knee osteoarthritis on mortality: a community-based cohort study with over 24 years of follow-up. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Apr;27(4):593-602. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 22.

    PMID: 30583096BACKGROUND
  • EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.

    PMID: 10109801BACKGROUND
  • Talma H, Chinapaw MJ, Bakker B, HiraSing RA, Terwee CB, Altenburg TM. Bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition in children and adolescents: a systematic review and evidence appraisal of validity, responsiveness, reliability and measurement error. Obes Rev. 2013 Nov;14(11):895-905. doi: 10.1111/obr.12061. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

    PMID: 23848977BACKGROUND
  • Leahy S, O'Neill C, Sohun R, Jakeman P. A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Feb;112(2):589-95. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2010-4. Epub 2011 May 26.

    PMID: 21614505BACKGROUND
  • Roos EM, Dahlberg L. Positive effects of moderate exercise on glycosaminoglycan content in knee cartilage: a four-month, randomized, controlled trial in patients at risk of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Nov;52(11):3507-14. doi: 10.1002/art.21415.

    PMID: 16258919BACKGROUND
  • Munukka M, Waller B, Hakkinen A, Nieminen MT, Lammentausta E, Kujala UM, Paloneva J, Kautiainen H, Kiviranta I, Heinonen A. Physical Activity Is Related with Cartilage Quality in Women with Knee Osteoarthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jul;49(7):1323-1330. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001238.

    PMID: 28240703BACKGROUND
  • Koli J, Multanen J, Kujala UM, Hakkinen A, Nieminen MT, Kautiainen H, Lammentausta E, Jamsa T, Ahola R, Selanne H, Kiviranta I, Heinonen A. Effects of Exercise on Patellar Cartilage in Women with Mild Knee Osteoarthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Sep;47(9):1767-74. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000629.

    PMID: 25668399BACKGROUND
  • Guermazi A, Alizai H, Crema MD, Trattnig S, Regatte RR, Roemer FW. Compositional MRI techniques for evaluation of cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Oct;23(10):1639-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.026. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

    PMID: 26050864BACKGROUND
  • Matzat SJ, van Tiel J, Gold GE, Oei EH. Quantitative MRI techniques of cartilage composition. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2013 Jun;3(3):162-74. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.06.04.

    PMID: 23833729BACKGROUND
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

    PMID: 21479777BACKGROUND
  • Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):647-673. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

    PMID: 33284428BACKGROUND
  • Conner-Spady BL, Marshall DA, Bohm E, Dunbar MJ, Loucks L, Al Khudairy A, Noseworthy TW. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul;24(7):1775-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0910-6. Epub 2015 Jan 3.

    PMID: 25555837BACKGROUND
  • Bilbao A, Garcia-Perez L, Arenaza JC, Garcia I, Ariza-Cardiel G, Trujillo-Martin E, Forjaz MJ, Martin-Fernandez J. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):2897-2908. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1929-x. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

    PMID: 29978346BACKGROUND
  • Kersten P, White PJ, Tennant A. The consultation and relational empathy measure: an investigation of its scaling structure. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(6):503-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.610493. Epub 2011 Oct 8.

    PMID: 21981037BACKGROUND
  • Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):699-705. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh621. Epub 2004 Nov 4.

    PMID: 15528286BACKGROUND
  • Whittaker JL, Cammalleri A, Archibald C, Brooks-Hill A, Chin P, Clark S, Davis JC, Hoens AM, Hunt MA, Kausky K, Ko A, Leveille L, Li LC, Lodhia P, Losciale JM, Miciak M, Mosewich AD, Sheikh A, Silvester-Lee T, Truong LK, Wade D, Wilson DR, Xie H, Yan XH, Roos EM. Digital education and exercise therapy versus minimal intervention for young people at high risk of early onset knee osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction: a study protocol for the Stop OsteoARthritis (SOAR) randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Jun 20;26(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08896-6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Knee InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesOsteoarthritis, KneeMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and InjuriesOsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesBehavior

Study Officials

  • Jackie L Whittaker, BScPT, PhD

    University of British Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Jackie L Whittaker, BScPT, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The proposed trial is a two-arm, assessor-blinded, superiority, hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 RCT.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2023

First Posted

January 8, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Last Updated

May 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Locations