Study Stopped
Withdrawal by sponsor
Liquid Biopsy With PET/CT Versus PET/CT Alone in Diagnosis of Small Lung Nodules
Liquid Biopsy in Combination With PET/CT Versus PET/CT Alone in Diagnosis of Small Lung Nodules
1 other identifier
observational
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if a liquid biopsy, a method of detecting cancer from a blood draw, combined with a PET/CT scan, a type of radiological scan, is better at determining whether a lung nodule is cancerous when compared to a PET/CT scan alone. A PET/CT scan is already used for diagnosis of lung nodules, but its efficacy is uncertain in nodules 6-20 mm in size. Therefore, the PET/CT will be evaluated for its diagnostic ability in lesions this size alone and in combination with a liquid biopsy. Secondarily, a machine learning model will be created to see if the combination of the PET/CT imaging data and the liquid biopsy data can predict the presence of cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2023
CompletedDecember 8, 2023
December 1, 2023
1.4 years
September 23, 2021
December 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of liquid biopsy with PET/CT to PET/CT alone for predicting lung cancer
Determine the sensitivity and specificity of liquid biopsy and PET/CT in combination compared with PET/CT alone for predicting lung cancer for lesions 6 mm- 20 mm in size
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
ctDNA gene panel ability in detecting lung cancer
24 months
DNA methylation liquid biopsy ability in detecting lung cancer
24 months
Validate ML classifier for predicting lung cancer
30 months
Study Arms (1)
Patients with Pulmonary Nodule
Patients at high-risk of lung cancer found to have a pulmonary nodule 6-20 mm in size.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with lung nodules found via imaging will be selected from the VA Palo Alto Health Care System.
You may qualify if:
- Over 18 years of age
- ECOG performance status of 0,1, or 2
- Newly discovered lung nodule with:
- At least one solid lung nodule measuring 6 mm- 20 mm in greatest diameter detected on screening CT
- No single lesion larger than 20 mm in greatest diameter when multiple nodules present
- High- or intermediate-risk nodules per American College of Chest Physician (ACCP) guidelines
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prior cancer of any type for the previous 3 years
- Prior organ, bone marrow, of hematopoietic stem cell transplant
- Contraindication to administration of \[18F\]FDG
- Inability to undergo a PET/CT scan
- Ongoing infection, either acute or subacute
- Severe COPD or lung disease requiring home oxygen use
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Related Publications (15)
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
PMID: 31912902BACKGROUNDMacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, Mehta AC, Ohno Y, Powell CA, Prokop M, Rubin GD, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Travis WD, Van Schil PE, Bankier AA. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161659. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
PMID: 28240562BACKGROUNDKinsinger LS, Anderson C, Kim J, Larson M, Chan SH, King HA, Rice KL, Slatore CG, Tanner NT, Pittman K, Monte RJ, McNeil RB, Grubber JM, Kelley MJ, Provenzale D, Datta SK, Sperber NS, Barnes LK, Abbott DH, Sims KJ, Whitley RL, Wu RR, Jackson GL. Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):399-406. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9022.
PMID: 28135352BACKGROUNDNational Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
PMID: 21714641BACKGROUNDHuo J, Xu Y, Sheu T, Volk RJ, Shih YT. Complication Rates and Downstream Medical Costs Associated With Invasive Diagnostic Procedures for Lung Abnormalities in the Community Setting. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):324-332. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6277.
PMID: 30640382BACKGROUNDNational Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines Lung Cancer Screening Version 1.2020.
BACKGROUNDLi S, Zhao B, Wang X, Yu J, Yan S, Lv C, Yang Y. Overestimated value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose pulmonary nodules: Analysis of 298 patients. Clin Radiol. 2014 Aug;69(8):e352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 27.
PMID: 24877581BACKGROUNDCescon DW, Bratman SV, Chan SM, Siu LL. Circulating tumor DNA and liquid biopsy in oncology. Nat Cancer. 2020 Mar;1(3):276-290. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-0043-5. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
PMID: 35122035BACKGROUNDNair VS, Keu KV, Luttgen MS, Kolatkar A, Vasanawala M, Kuschner W, Bethel K, Iagaru AH, Hoh C, Shrager JB, Loo BW Jr, Bazhenova L, Nieva J, Gambhir SS, Kuhn P. An observational study of circulating tumor cells and (18)F-FDG PET uptake in patients with treatment-naive non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 5;8(7):e67733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067733. Print 2013.
PMID: 23861795BACKGROUNDOdahowski CL, Zahnd WE, Eberth JM. Challenges and Opportunities for Lung Cancer Screening in Rural America. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr;16(4 Pt B):590-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.001.
PMID: 30947892BACKGROUNDSpalluto LB, Lewis JA, LaBaze S, Sandler KL, Paulson AB, Callaway-Lane C, Grogan EL, Massion PP, Roumie CL. Association of a Lung Screening Program Coordinator With Adherence to Annual CT Lung Screening at a Large Academic Institution. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Feb;17(2):208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
PMID: 31499025BACKGROUNDTriplette M, Thayer JH, Pipavath SN, Crothers K. Poor Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: Opportunities for Improvement. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr;16(4 Pt A):446-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
PMID: 30777648BACKGROUNDRuilong Z, Daohai X, Li G, Xiaohong W, Chunjie W, Lei T. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Jan;38(1):67-75. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000605.
PMID: 27741214BACKGROUNDTang K, Wang L, Lin J, Zheng X, Wu Y. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of different size of solitary pulmonary nodules. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(11):e14813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014813.
PMID: 30882661BACKGROUNDConstancio V, Nunes SP, Henrique R, Jeronimo C. DNA Methylation-Based Testing in Liquid Biopsies as Detection and Prognostic Biomarkers for the Four Major Cancer Types. Cells. 2020 Mar 5;9(3):624. doi: 10.3390/cells9030624.
PMID: 32150897BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
Whole blood sample
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rajesh Shah, MD
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Interventional Radiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2021
First Posted
October 4, 2021
Study Start
September 23, 2021
Primary Completion
February 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 1, 2023
Last Updated
December 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share