NCT05060055

Brief Summary

After a single-tooth extraction, physiological remodeling processes are unavoidable which leads to a total loss of the periodontal ligament and resorption of the bundle bone. Immediate implant placement associated with bone substitutes and customized healing abutments seems to reduce the amount of resorption at peri-implant areas. Recently, studies evaluating the use of a connective tissue grafts are being conducted in order to assess possible final outcome advantages in immediate implant procedures. This study aims to evaluate peri-implant tissue dimensional changes after the use of a customized healing abutment with or without connective tissue graft in flapless maxillary immediate implant placement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 26, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 4, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 9, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 15, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

July 26, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 12, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

autograftswound healingthree-dimensional imagingtreatment outcomedental implantsalveolar ridge augmentationalveolar bone loss

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Buccal volume variation (BVvT0)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal aspect. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Buccal Volume Variation (BVv0-1, BVv0-2, and BVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0.

    Baseline (T0); 1 month (T1); 4 months (T2) and 12 months (T3)

  • Buccal volume variation (BVvT1)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal aspect. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Buccal Volume Variation (BVv0-1, BVv0-2, and BVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0.

    1 month (T1)

  • Buccal volume variation (BVvT2)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal aspect. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Buccal Volume Variation (BVv0-1, BVv0-2, and BVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0.

    4 months (T2)

  • Buccal volume variation (BVvT3)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal aspect. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Buccal Volume Variation (BVv0-1, BVv0-2, and BVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0.

    12 months (T3)

  • Total volume variation (TVvT0)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal and palatal side. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Total Volume Variation (TVv0-1, TVv0-2, e TVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0

    Baseline (T0); 1 month (T1); 4 months (T2) and 12 months (T3)

  • Total volume variation (TVvT0)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal and palatal side. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Total Volume Variation (TVv0-1, TVv0-2, e TVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0

    Baseline (T0)

  • Total volume variation (TVvT1)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal and palatal side. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Total Volume Variation (TVv0-1, TVv0-2, e TVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0

    1 month (T1)

  • Total volume variation (TVvT2)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal and palatal side. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Total Volume Variation (TVv0-1, TVv0-2, e TVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0

    4 months (T2)

  • Total volume variation (TVvT3)

    Variation of the alveolar volume at the buccal and palatal side. The 3D-analysis was conducted with "Boolean" functions, which allowed researchers to obtain the volume variation in each time point from different variables like the Total Volume Variation (TVv0-1, TVv0-2, e TVv0-3), computed in cubic millimetres (mm3) and To allow a direct comparison of different sites at different time points, relative percentages of these variables were calculated based on the ROI volume at T0

    12 months (T3)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Buccal wall thickness (BT)

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Test Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Customized healing abutment inserted in immediate implant placement in association with the use of a connective tissue graft.

Procedure: Immediate dental implant placement

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Customized healing abutment inserted in immediate implant placement.

Procedure: Immediate dental implant placement

Interventions

Immediate dental implant placement

Control GroupTest Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \) ≥18 years of age; 2) patients who had a failing tooth and needed an implant placing therapy in the aesthetic zone (between 15-25); 3) the failing tooth has adjacent and opposing natural teeth; 4) sufficient mesial-distal and inter-occlusal space for placement of the implant and definitive restoration; 5) had an intact socket wall previously to the extraction; 6) had sufficient apical bone to place an immediate implant with minimum primary stability of 30 N/cm.

You may not qualify if:

  • individuals diagnosed with periodontal disease; medical and general contraindications for the surgical procedure; heavy smokers (\> 10 cigarettes/day); an active infection at the implant site.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

Viseu, 3500, Portugal

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Fernandes D, Marques T, Borges T, Montero J. Volumetric analysis on the use of customized healing abutments with or without connective tissue graft at flapless maxillary immediate implant placement: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Sep;34(9):934-946. doi: 10.1111/clr.14119. Epub 2023 Jun 29.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone ResorptionBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPeriodontal AtrophyPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The present study was designed as a prospective, controlled clinical trial with a parallel-group design and balanced randomization (ratio 1:1)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Adjunct-Professor, Head of Oral Surgery, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health. Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Viseu, Portugal.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2021

First Posted

September 28, 2021

Study Start

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion

November 4, 2022

Study Completion

November 9, 2022

Last Updated

November 15, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Locations