Vetsibular Socket Therapy Versus Buser's Technique
VST
Immediate Implant Placement Using Vestibular Socket Therapy Versus Early Implant Placement Using Buser's Technique for Managing Type 2 Extraction Sockets: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
immediate implant placement using the VST was compared to early implant placement protocol using Buser's technique regarding implant survival, changes in labial plate thickness and soft tissue height after 1 year of implant placement
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2021
CompletedApril 26, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.6 years
March 4, 2021
April 25, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
vertical and horizontal soft tissue changes
Amount of soft tissue changes were identified midfacially and at the apex of the mesial and distal papillae by superimposing the STL files of the models, obtained via intra-oral scanning, at the baseline (of the unrestorable tooth) with those after 12 months of implant insertion. The 3D software roughly aligned of both pre-and postoperative models through 3 identical points, identified on their surfaces. The best-fit algorithm of the software then perfected the superimposition process. The superimposed models were then imported into an STL viewer, where the measurements were performed. This method was proven to be accurate in volumetric measurements of hard and soft tissues.
crown delivery and 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
labial plate thickness changes
implant insertion -1 year
implant survival
Implant insertion- 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Vestibulart socket therapy and immediate implants
EXPERIMENTALA subperiosteal tunnel was created connecting the socket orifice and the vestibular access incision using periotomes and micro periosteal elevators (. Implant fixture were then inserted . A flexible cortical membrane shield that is made of cortical bone of heterologous origin was introduced from the vestibular access incision reaching 1 mm below the socket orifice through the tunnel then stabilized using a membrane tack or a micro screw to the alveolar bone apical to the base of the socket . The socket gap between the implant and the shield was then packed thoroughly with particulate bone graft
Buser's technique and early implant placement
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Buser's group early implant placement, the failing tooth was extracted atraumatically using a periotome. A collagen plug was placed to stabilize the wound clot. A healing period of 4-8 weeks was followed. Then an open flap implant surgery using a triangular flap design was cut. Implant was then placed under the crest of the palatal bone. A healing abutment was then attached. Contour augmentation was done using autogenous bone chips mixed with saline and bone conditioned medium (BCM) added to bioss bone granules to activate it.
Interventions
One-cm long vestibular access incision was made using a 15c blade 3-4 mm apical to the mucogingival junction at the related socket . A subperiosteal tunnel was created connecting the socket orifice and the vestibular access incision using periotomes and micro periosteal elevators (. Implant fixture were then inserted after drilling to its pre-planned location 3-4 mm apical to socket base with adequate primary stability achieved using a torque wrench reaching 30 Ncm torque . A flexible cortical membrane shield that is made of cortical bone of heterologous origin of 0.6 mm thickness was hydrated and then trimmed and introduced from the vestibular access incision reaching 1 mm below the socket orifice through the tunnel . The socket gap between the implant and the shield was then packed thoroughly with particulate bone graft
In Buser's group early implant placement, the failing tooth was extracted atraumatically using a periotome. A collagen plug was placed to stabilize the wound clot. A healing period of 4-8 weeks (depending on the size of the extracted tooth) was followed. Then an open flap implant surgery using a triangular flap design was cut. After preparing the implant bed, the site was irrigated using normal saline. A healing abutment was then attached. Contour augmentation was done using autogenous bone chips mixed with saline and bone. A non-cross liked membrane was then placed, after being soaked with BCM. Finally, the healing abutment was removed and the flap was released to allow for its suturing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all patients were adults ≥ 18 years
- non-adjacent hopeless maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone.
- The involved teeth had type II sockets.
- To achieve optimum primary stability for the implants (30Ncm insertion torque), adequate palatal and at least 3 mm apical bone should be available to engage the immediately placed implants.
You may not qualify if:
- Smoking and/or pregnant patients
- systemic diseases
- a history of chemo- or radiotherapy within the past 2 years were excluded.
- Infected sockets were also excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
- BioHorizons, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Faculty of dentistry
Cairo, Manial, 12911, Egypt
ElAskary and Associates Private clinic
Alexandria, Egypt
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Iman Radi, PhD
Cairo University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AbdelSalam Alaskary, BDS
Private Practice
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- AE and IR were responsible for measuring the outcomes and they were blinded to the treatments, since they were not involved in the treatment The statistician was also blinded to the treatment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2021
First Posted
March 8, 2021
Study Start
January 30, 2019
Primary Completion
August 31, 2020
Study Completion
October 31, 2020
Last Updated
April 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share