Sinus Floor Augmentation and Graft Compared Sinus Membrane Elevation With Blood Coagulum. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With a 1:1 Mixture of Autogenous Bone Graft and Symbios Xenograft Granules Compared With Blood Coagulum. A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Implant placement in posterior maxilla is often compromised or impossible due to atrophy of the bone and pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus. Thus, alveolar ridge augmentation is frequently necessary. The most commonly used method to augment the maxillary region involves the maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with autogenous bone graft or bone substitute. Harvesting of autogenous bone graft is associated with risk of donor site morbidity and unpredictable resorption of the graft. Thus, bone substitutes alone or in combination with autogenous bone are used increasingly. Symbios xenograft granules is a new porcine bone mineral. Long-term studies have demonstrated that xenograft contains osteoconductive properties and is a safe grafting material. MSFA with xenograft alone or in combination with autogenous bone have shown high implant survival with new bone formation. In contrast, the maxillary sinus cavities possess significant potential for bone regeneration without the use of additional bone grafts or bone substitutes due to the principle of periosteal guided bone regeneration and surrounding bony walls. Bone regeneration after maxillary sinus membrane elevation with the use of coagulum as grafting material has shown high implant survival with new bone formation, as documented in reviews and short-term studies. The objective is to test the H0-hypothesis of no difference in the long-term implant outcome after MSFA with 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone graft and Symbios xenograft (control) compared with the coagulum (test). Forty consecutively healthy patients with a missing posterior maxillary tooth will be allocated to test or control. Implants will be inserted simultaneously with the MSFA. Clinical and/or radiographical evaluation using periapical radiographs and Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) will be performed preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, before abutment connection, after prosthetic rehabilitation, and one year after loading to assess the implant treatment outcome and the volumetric changes of the augmented area. The primary outcome will include survival of suprastructures, survival of implants, volumetric stability of the augmented area, peri-implant marginal bone level, oral health related quality of life, and complications related to the two treatment modalities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedFebruary 18, 2022
February 1, 2022
11 months
November 30, 2020
February 17, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Survival of suprastructures
Loss of suprastructures is defined as a total loss because of a non-treatable mechanical/or biological complication
After one year of functional loading
Survival of implants
Loss of implants is defined as removal of a non-integrated implant, mobility of previously clinical osseointegrated implant, and removal of non-mobile implants due to progressive peri-implant marginal bone loss and infection
After one year of functional loading
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Volumetric changes of the graft material
One year after sinus floor elevation and augmentation
Peri-implant marginal bone level
One year of functional loading
Study Arms (2)
Bone substitue
PLACEBO COMPARATORBone augmentation with bone substitute
Coagulum
EXPERIMENTALBone augmentation with coagulum
Interventions
Maxillary sinus membrane elevation with blood coagulum
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 1:1 autogenous bone graft and deprotinized porcine bone mineral
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥20 years.
- Missing one posterior maxillary tooth.
- Residual bone height of the maxillary alveolar process ≥4-7 mm≤.
- Width of the alveolar process ≥6.5 mm.
- Mandibular occluding teeth.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to implant therapy.
- Full mouth plaque score \>25%.
- Progressive marginal periodontitis.
- Acute infection in the area intended for implant placement.
- Parafunction, bruxism, or clenching.
- Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
- Heavy tobacco use, define as \>10 cigarettes per day.
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, North Denmark, 9000, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, DDS, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2020
First Posted
December 14, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
February 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Patient data will not be shared