NCT04667260

Brief Summary

Implant placement in posterior maxilla is often compromised or impossible due to atrophy of the bone and pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus. Thus, alveolar ridge augmentation is frequently necessary. The most commonly used method to augment the maxillary region involves the maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with autogenous bone graft or bone substitute. Harvesting of autogenous bone graft is associated with risk of donor site morbidity and unpredictable resorption of the graft. Thus, bone substitutes alone or in combination with autogenous bone are used increasingly. Symbios xenograft granules is a new porcine bone mineral. Long-term studies have demonstrated that xenograft contains osteoconductive properties and is a safe grafting material. MSFA with xenograft alone or in combination with autogenous bone have shown high implant survival with new bone formation. In contrast, the maxillary sinus cavities possess significant potential for bone regeneration without the use of additional bone grafts or bone substitutes due to the principle of periosteal guided bone regeneration and surrounding bony walls. Bone regeneration after maxillary sinus membrane elevation with the use of coagulum as grafting material has shown high implant survival with new bone formation, as documented in reviews and short-term studies. The objective is to test the H0-hypothesis of no difference in the long-term implant outcome after MSFA with 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone graft and Symbios xenograft (control) compared with the coagulum (test). Forty consecutively healthy patients with a missing posterior maxillary tooth will be allocated to test or control. Implants will be inserted simultaneously with the MSFA. Clinical and/or radiographical evaluation using periapical radiographs and Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) will be performed preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, before abutment connection, after prosthetic rehabilitation, and one year after loading to assess the implant treatment outcome and the volumetric changes of the augmented area. The primary outcome will include survival of suprastructures, survival of implants, volumetric stability of the augmented area, peri-implant marginal bone level, oral health related quality of life, and complications related to the two treatment modalities.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2020

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 14, 2020

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 18, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

November 30, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Survival of suprastructures

    Loss of suprastructures is defined as a total loss because of a non-treatable mechanical/or biological complication

    After one year of functional loading

  • Survival of implants

    Loss of implants is defined as removal of a non-integrated implant, mobility of previously clinical osseointegrated implant, and removal of non-mobile implants due to progressive peri-implant marginal bone loss and infection

    After one year of functional loading

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Volumetric changes of the graft material

    One year after sinus floor elevation and augmentation

  • Peri-implant marginal bone level

    One year of functional loading

Study Arms (2)

Bone substitue

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Bone augmentation with bone substitute

Procedure: Maxillary sinus membrane elevationProcedure: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation

Coagulum

EXPERIMENTAL

Bone augmentation with coagulum

Procedure: Maxillary sinus membrane elevationProcedure: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation

Interventions

Maxillary sinus membrane elevation with blood coagulum

Also known as: Sinus membrane elevation
Bone substitueCoagulum

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 1:1 autogenous bone graft and deprotinized porcine bone mineral

Also known as: Sinus floor augmentation
Bone substitueCoagulum

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥20 years.
  • Missing one posterior maxillary tooth.
  • Residual bone height of the maxillary alveolar process ≥4-7 mm≤.
  • Width of the alveolar process ≥6.5 mm.
  • Mandibular occluding teeth.

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindications to implant therapy.
  • Full mouth plaque score \>25%.
  • Progressive marginal periodontitis.
  • Acute infection in the area intended for implant placement.
  • Parafunction, bruxism, or clenching.
  • Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
  • Heavy tobacco use, define as \>10 cigarettes per day.
  • Pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, North Denmark, 9000, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Sinus Floor Augmentation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Oral Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeBone TransplantationOrthopedic ProceduresDentistry

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Blinded
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, DDS, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2020

First Posted

December 14, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion

December 1, 2020

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

February 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Patient data will not be shared

Locations