NCT05058066

Brief Summary

A single centre, open, comparative, parallel group, prospective clinical investigation with a single 10 year follow up visit.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 24, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 21, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 21, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 7, 2021

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 7, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • implant stability

    Implant Stability Quotiënt (ISQ) will be measured at the 10y-visit. The resonance frequency analysis renders an ISQ value ranging from 1 to 100. Measurements shall be performed at the abutment level, as is done in the previous investigations. The highest and lowest ISQ value out of two perpendicular measurements shall be recorded as ISQ High and ISQ low. The measurement should preferably be done by the same Osstell instrument (Osstell, Gothenburg, Sweden) that was used in the previous completed study. SmartPeg Type 43 and 55 shall be used during the measurement (Osstell, Gothenburg, Sweden). The procedures for obtaining ISQ values is described in the manufacturer's instruction that will be handed out to the investigators.

    10 years after implantation

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • implant survival

    10 years after implantation

  • soft tissue reaction

    10 years after implantation

  • device use

    10 years after surgery

Study Arms (3)

Control implant loaded at 6 weeks post-surgery

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control implant included the previous generation as-machined titanium Baha® flange fixture (diameter 3.75mm; length 4mm) with 6mm conically shaped abutment.

Device: Baha® flange fixture (diameter 3.75mm; length 4mm) with 6mm abutment

Test implant loaded at 6 weeks post-surgery

EXPERIMENTAL

The test implant and the implant used for the 3-week loading trial included the wide diameter titanium implant (diameter 4.5mm; length 4mm) with 6mm rounded, apically converging titanium abutment developed by Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB (Mölnlyncke, Sweden). This system with an additional minor change to the internal abutment connection design was later commercialized under the name Cochlear™ Baha® BIA300 Implant with abutment.

Device: Baha® BIA300 Implant (diameter 4.5mm; length 4mm) with 6mm abutment

Test implant loaded at 3 weeks post-surgery

EXPERIMENTAL

The test implant and the implant used for the 3-week loading trial included the wide diameter titanium implant (diameter 4.5mm; length 4mm) with 6mm rounded, apically converging titanium abutment developed by Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB (Mölnlyncke, Sweden). This system with an additional minor change to the internal abutment connection design was later commercialized under the name Cochlear™ Baha® BIA300 Implant with abutment.

Device: Baha® BIA300 Implant (diameter 4.5mm; length 4mm) with 6mm abutmentProcedure: Early loading

Interventions

The control implant included the previous generation as-machined titanium Baha® flange fixture (diameter 3.75mm; length 4mm) with 6mm conically shaped abutment.

Control implant loaded at 6 weeks post-surgery

The test implant and the implant used for the 3-week loading trial included the wide diameter titanium implant (diameter 4.5mm; length 4mm) with 6mm rounded, apically converging titanium abutment developed by Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB (Mölnlyncke, Sweden). This system with an additional minor change to the internal abutment connection design was later commercialized under the name Cochlear™ Baha® BIA300 Implant with abutment. In addition to the difference in abutment shape and the wider diameter, the test implant incorporates small-sized threads at the implant neck and the moderately rough TiOblast™ (Dentsply, Mölndal, Sweden) surface on the intraosseous part of the implant6-8.

Test implant loaded at 3 weeks post-surgeryTest implant loaded at 6 weeks post-surgery
Early loadingPROCEDURE

Loading the implant at 3 weeks after implantation (instead of 6 weeks after implantation)

Test implant loaded at 3 weeks post-surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • To be included in the original trials, patients had to be at least 18 years old.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525EX, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Teunissen EM, Caspers CJI, Vijverberg MA, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Long-Term Follow-up of a Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: 10-Year Experience on Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Implant-Abutment Combination. Otol Neurotol. 2023 Jan 1;44(1):40-46. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003763. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

    PMID: 36417764BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Interventions

Immediate Dental Implant Loading

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantationOral Surgical Procedures, PreprostheticOral Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeProsthesis ImplantationDentistryProsthodontics

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2021

First Posted

September 27, 2021

Study Start

June 24, 2019

Primary Completion

September 21, 2020

Study Completion

September 21, 2020

Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2021-09

Locations