10-year Follow-up of a Wide Diameter Bone Anchored Hearing Implant
Long-term Follow-up of a Wide Diameter Bone Anchored Hearing Implant: the 10-year Experience on Stability, Survival and Tolerability of the BIA300®
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A single centre, open, comparative, parallel group, prospective clinical investigation with a single 10 year follow up visit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2021
CompletedNovember 18, 2025
September 1, 2021
1.2 years
September 7, 2021
November 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
implant stability
Implant Stability Quotiënt (ISQ) will be measured at the 10y-visit. The resonance frequency analysis renders an ISQ value ranging from 1 to 100. Measurements shall be performed at the abutment level, as is done in the previous investigations. The highest and lowest ISQ value out of two perpendicular measurements shall be recorded as ISQ High and ISQ low. The measurement should preferably be done by the same Osstell instrument (Osstell, Gothenburg, Sweden) that was used in the previous completed study. SmartPeg Type 43 and 55 shall be used during the measurement (Osstell, Gothenburg, Sweden). The procedures for obtaining ISQ values is described in the manufacturer's instruction that will be handed out to the investigators.
10 years after implantation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
implant survival
10 years after implantation
soft tissue reaction
10 years after implantation
device use
10 years after surgery
Study Arms (3)
Control implant loaded at 6 weeks post-surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control implant included the previous generation as-machined titanium Baha® flange fixture (diameter 3.75mm; length 4mm) with 6mm conically shaped abutment.
Test implant loaded at 6 weeks post-surgery
EXPERIMENTALThe test implant and the implant used for the 3-week loading trial included the wide diameter titanium implant (diameter 4.5mm; length 4mm) with 6mm rounded, apically converging titanium abutment developed by Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB (Mölnlyncke, Sweden). This system with an additional minor change to the internal abutment connection design was later commercialized under the name Cochlear™ Baha® BIA300 Implant with abutment.
Test implant loaded at 3 weeks post-surgery
EXPERIMENTALThe test implant and the implant used for the 3-week loading trial included the wide diameter titanium implant (diameter 4.5mm; length 4mm) with 6mm rounded, apically converging titanium abutment developed by Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB (Mölnlyncke, Sweden). This system with an additional minor change to the internal abutment connection design was later commercialized under the name Cochlear™ Baha® BIA300 Implant with abutment.
Interventions
The control implant included the previous generation as-machined titanium Baha® flange fixture (diameter 3.75mm; length 4mm) with 6mm conically shaped abutment.
The test implant and the implant used for the 3-week loading trial included the wide diameter titanium implant (diameter 4.5mm; length 4mm) with 6mm rounded, apically converging titanium abutment developed by Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB (Mölnlyncke, Sweden). This system with an additional minor change to the internal abutment connection design was later commercialized under the name Cochlear™ Baha® BIA300 Implant with abutment. In addition to the difference in abutment shape and the wider diameter, the test implant incorporates small-sized threads at the implant neck and the moderately rough TiOblast™ (Dentsply, Mölndal, Sweden) surface on the intraosseous part of the implant6-8.
Loading the implant at 3 weeks after implantation (instead of 6 weeks after implantation)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be included in the original trials, patients had to be at least 18 years old.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525EX, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Teunissen EM, Caspers CJI, Vijverberg MA, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Long-Term Follow-up of a Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: 10-Year Experience on Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Implant-Abutment Combination. Otol Neurotol. 2023 Jan 1;44(1):40-46. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003763. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
PMID: 36417764BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2021
First Posted
September 27, 2021
Study Start
June 24, 2019
Primary Completion
September 21, 2020
Study Completion
September 21, 2020
Last Updated
November 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2021-09