Community Health Workers and Teleaudiology as a Culturally-relevant Approach to Improving Access to Hearing Health Care
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of a teleaudiology intervention with assistance from Community Health Workers to improve access to hearing health care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 4, 2020
CompletedMay 17, 2022
May 1, 2022
5 months
March 3, 2019
May 15, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self-efficacy: The Self-Efficacy for Situational Communication Management Questionnaire
The Self-Efficacy for Situational Communication Management Questionnaire (Jennings, 2005; Jennings et al, 2014) measures self-perceived hearing ability and hearing self-efficacy, or a participant's beliefs in their ability to manage communication with acquired hearing loss. The SESMQ contains 20 situations that are rated on two scales, hearing ability and perceived self-efficacy. Participants respond on a Likert scale from 0 (not well at all) to 10 (very well) to how well they can hear and how well they can manage in each situation. Total scores on each scale range from 0-200, with higher scores representing better perceived self-efficacy and better hearing ability. The two scales are scored and reported separately. We will evaluate the differences in SESMQ scores between experimental and control groups at 2-weeks post hearing aid fitting. Analyses will utilize baseline data and follow-up analyses will occur for 6-week and 12-week timepoints.
Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after hearing aid fitting
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Hearing aid benefit
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 14 weeks after hearing aid fitting
Satisfaction with teleaudiology service delivery
2 weeks after hearing aid fitting
Qualitative outcomes via semi-structured interviews
14 weeks after hearing aid fitting
Average hours of hearing aid usage per day
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 14 weeks after hearing aid fitting
Subjective hearing aid benefit
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 14 weeks after hearing aid fitting
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to the experimental group will receive hearing aid fitting and verification services via teleaudiology with local, hands-on support from a Community Health Worker.
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to the control group will receive hearing aid fitting and verification services via teleaudiology with local, hands-on support from a non-Community Health Worker (undergraduate student in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences).
Interventions
In this project, remote hearing aid fittings will be delivered by an audiologist with patient-site support from a local facilitator for a cohort of older adults (\>50 years) from a rural area that has been identified as under-resourced for hearing health care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilateral hearing loss within the fitting range of study hearing aids
You may not qualify if:
- Medically unqualified to receive hearing aids
- Current hearing aid user
- Cognitively impaired
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mariposa Community Health Center
Nogales, Arizona, 85621, United States
Related Publications (2)
Coco L, Leon K, Navarro C, Piper R, Carvajal S, Marrone N. "Close to My Community": A Qualitative Study of Community Health Worker-Supported Teleaudiology Hearing Aid Services. Ear Hear. 2024 Sep-Oct 01;45(5):1191-1201. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001507. Epub 2024 May 30.
PMID: 38812073DERIVEDMarrone NL, Nieman CL, Coco L. Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity. Ear Hear. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;43(Suppl 1):33S-44S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001183. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
PMID: 35724253DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura S Coco, AuD
University of Arizona
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2019
First Posted
March 6, 2019
Study Start
October 30, 2019
Primary Completion
March 27, 2020
Study Completion
June 4, 2020
Last Updated
May 17, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share