Preanesthetic Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI) and Propofol Injection Pain
Can Preanesthetic Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI) Predict Propofol Injection Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recently, Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) has been evaluated for objectively measuring peri-operative pain and to guide intra-operative opioid administration during various surgeries. Propofol injection pain (PIP) is a common problem and can be very distressing to the patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2023
CompletedOctober 10, 2023
October 1, 2023
9 days
August 24, 2021
October 6, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The correlation of Analgesia/nociception Index (ANI) and Propofol injection pain (PIP)
The correlation of preanesthetic ANI scores and incidence of PIP.
Immediately before administration of propofol (2mg/kg)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Incidence and severity of PIP
during anesthesia induction ( half-dose (1mg/kg) and full-dose of (2mg/kg) propofol administration)
The correlation of Analgesia/nociception Index (ANI) and Propofol injection pain (PIP)
Immediately before administration of propofol (2mg/kg)
Study Arms (2)
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORTo maintain blinding, in the control group, the remifentanil infusion was replaced with 50 ml of normal saline in 50 ml syringe. The remifentanil (or saline) infusion was run until the pump indicated the target Ce had been achieved. Pharmacokinetic model for remifentanil was the Minto model (Height, Weight, and Age) Anesthesia in all patients was induced using 2 mg/kg of 2% propofol. The attending anesthesiologist asked the patients how they felt pain to evaluate pain severity of PIP while half -dose of propofol was administered. After the rest of the propofol was administered, the attending anesthesiologists asked the same question.
Remifentanil group
EXPERIMENTALRemifentanil 1 mg was diluted into 50 ml of normal saline. A commercial TCI pump (Orchestra Base Primea, Fresenius Vial, France) was used for the effect-site TCI of remifentanil. The study groups received remifentanil to a target Ce of 4 ng/ ml. Pharmacokinetic model for remifentanil was the Minto model (Height, Weight, and Age) Anesthesia induction and the evaluation of pain were same as control group
Interventions
V1 and V5 electrocardiographic positions as per the manufacturer's recommendations. The ANI was continuously recorded and displayed with a frequency of 1 Hz. ANI scores measured immediately before propofol administration, half-dose administration (1mg/kg), and full-dose administration (2mg/kg)of propofol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male patients who scheduled for general anesthesia
- Cognitive patients who could understand this study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients receiving β-receptor blockers, ketamine, clonidine, or any vasoactive substance (i.e. metaraminol, ephedrine) and patients receiving neostigmine, atropine or glycopyrrolate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
WonwangUH
Iksan, Jeollabuk-do, 570-711, South Korea
Related Publications (3)
Chanques G, Tarri T, Ride A, Prades A, De Jong A, Carr J, Molinari N, Jaber S. Analgesia nociception index for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients: a diagnostic accuracy study. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):812-820. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex210.
PMID: 29121287BACKGROUNDLedowski T. Objective monitoring of nociception: a review of current commercial solutions. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e312-e321. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
PMID: 31047645BACKGROUNDAbdullayev R, Yildirim E, Celik B, Topcu Sarica L. Analgesia Nociception Index: Heart Rate Variability Analysis of Emotional Status. Cureus. 2019 Apr 2;11(4):e4365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4365.
PMID: 31192070BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cheol Lee, M.D,Ph.D
Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All study drugs were administered using a Minto pharmacokinetic model in a TCI device (Orchestra, Fresenius-Vial, France). The infusion pump was covered to blind the patients, investigator, and outcomes assessor
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2021
First Posted
September 20, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2023
Primary Completion
April 10, 2023
Study Completion
June 30, 2023
Last Updated
October 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
if other researchers ask, a decision will be made after discussion with the co-authors