Study Stopped
Study cancelled
Preoperative Fluoroscopy Guided Hip Articular Branch Blocks and Analgesic Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Arthroscopic hip surgeries are increasingly being performed as both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. These procedures are considerably painful, thus requiring the proper pain management techniques in order to provide patient satisfaction and sufficient pain control. Articular branch blocks have not been evaluated for their use in hip arthroscopy, but have potential advantages of blocking the sensory innervation of the entire hip joint, with minimal impact on motor innervation compared to alternative blocks. This current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using preoperative fluoroscopic-guided blockade of articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves for analgesic management of patients undergoing arthroscopy compared to a saline sham block. The utility of pre-operative hip articular branch block (ABB) prior to hip arthroscopy will provide superior pain management postoperatively compared to a saline sham block. We hypothesize that the ABB (Articular Branch Block) will reduce the area under the NRS pain scores by time curve (AUC) and decreased oral opioid milligram equivalent use in the first 24 hours post-operatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedSeptember 16, 2021
September 1, 2021
5 months
August 17, 2020
September 13, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
NRS Pain Scores (NRS)
Numerical Rating Scale is a self-reported pain assessment, in which a patient indicates their current pain level experienced. Patients can rate their pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain imaginable). Higher scores indicated on this scale may indicate that a patient is experiencing higher pain intensities at that particular point in time. Whereas lower reported scores indicate that the patient is experiencing less intense or minimal pain.
24 hours post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The QOR-15 (Quality of Recovery)
24 hours post-operatively
Analgesic medication use
24 hours post-operatively
Study Arms (2)
Sham Injection
SHAM COMPARATOR20cc of Normal Saline 0.9%
Articular Branch Block (ABB)
EXPERIMENTAL20cc of 0.5% Bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000
Interventions
0.5% Bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 (Articular Branch Block)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presenting for Hip Arthroscopy (Diagnostic or Therapeutic)
- Pre-operative Numeric Rating Score (NRS) for pain \<8 on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergies to any of the study medications
- Anti-coagulation status (INR \> 1.1, PT or APTT \> 1.5 control)
- History of Hip Arthroplasty
- Infection of Hip
- Evidence of tumor
- Pregnancy
- History of diabetes with HbA1c \> 10%
- Prior history of Hip Articular Branch Blockade or Hip Articular Branch PRF Ablation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (17)
Colvin AC, Harrast J, Harner C. Trends in hip arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 15;94(4):e23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01886.
PMID: 22336982BACKGROUNDYu HC, Al-Shehri M, Johnston KD, Endersby R, Baghirzada L. Anesthesia for hip arthroscopy: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;63(11):1277-90. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0718-7. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
PMID: 27530361BACKGROUNDSteinhaus ME, Rosneck J, Ahmad CS, Lynch TS. Outcomes After Peripheral Nerve Block in Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jun;47(6). doi: 10.12788/ajo.2018.0049.
PMID: 29979805BACKGROUNDGARDNER E. The innervation of the hip joint. Anat Rec. 1948 Jul;101(3):353-71. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091010309. No abstract available.
PMID: 18873153BACKGROUNDAprato A, Giachino M, Masse A. Arthroscopic approach and anatomy of the hip. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016 Dec 21;6(3):309-316. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2016.6.3.309. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
PMID: 28066735BACKGROUNDByrd JW. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Jul;14(7):433-44. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00006. No abstract available.
PMID: 16822891BACKGROUNDPhilippi MT, Kahn TL, Adeyemi TF, Maak TG, Aoki SK. Extracapsular local infiltration analgesia in hip arthroscopy patients: a randomized, prospective study. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Sep 18;5(3):226-232. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny030. eCollection 2018 Aug.
PMID: 30393549BACKGROUNDKay J, de Sa D, Memon M, Simunovic N, Paul J, Ayeni OR. Examining the Role of Perioperative Nerve Blocks in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 Apr;32(4):704-15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.022. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
PMID: 26907370BACKGROUNDKapural L, Jolly S, Mantoan J, Badhey H, Ptacek T. Cooled Radiofrequency Neurotomy of the Articular Sensory Branches of the Obturator and Femoral Nerves - Combined Approach Using Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound Guidance: Technical Report, and Observational Study on Safety and Efficacy. Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):279-284.
PMID: 29871372BACKGROUNDNye ZB, Horn JL, Crittenden W, Abrahams MS, Aziz MF. Ambulatory continuous posterior lumbar plexus blocks following hip arthroscopy: a review of 213 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Jun;25(4):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 May 9.
PMID: 23665305BACKGROUNDDold AP, Murnaghan L, Xing J, Abdallah FW, Brull R, Whelan DB. Preoperative femoral nerve block in hip arthroscopic surgery: a retrospective review of 108 consecutive cases. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):144-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513510392. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
PMID: 24284048BACKGROUNDKrych AJ, Baran S, Kuzma SA, Smith HM, Johnson RL, Levy BA. Utility of multimodal analgesia with fascia iliaca blockade for acute pain management following hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):843-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2665-y. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
PMID: 24061718BACKGROUNDLee EM, Murphy KP, Ben-David B. Postoperative analgesia for hip arthroscopy: combined L1 and L2 paravertebral blocks. J Clin Anesth. 2008 Sep;20(6):462-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.04.012.
PMID: 18929290BACKGROUNDKeller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):309-18. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005.
PMID: 15322437BACKGROUNDStark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
PMID: 23411725BACKGROUNDGriffin DR, Parsons N, Mohtadi NG, Safran MR; Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):611-6; quiz 616-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.027.
PMID: 22542434BACKGROUNDYaDeau JT, Tedore T, Goytizolo EA, Kim DH, Green DS, Westrick A, Fan R, Rade MC, Ranawat AS, Coleman SH, Kelly BT. Lumbar plexus blockade reduces pain after hip arthroscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2012 Oct;115(4):968-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318265bacd. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
PMID: 22822195BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2020
First Posted
September 3, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
September 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09