NCT05048433

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to develop an implementation strategy to improve the use and sustainment of active learning in elementary schools and to conduct a feasibility study to evaluate the impact of the developed implementation strategy on the implementation and effectiveness of active learning.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
301

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2021

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 17, 2021

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 4, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 22, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 22, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 14, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 14, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

September 8, 2021

Results QC Date

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Implementation of Physical Activity Programs in Schools

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Acceptability of Active Learning Among Teachers as Assessed by the Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM)

    The Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) total score is from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing higher levels of acceptability.

    Baseline

  • Acceptability of Active Learning Among Teachers as Assessed by the Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM)

    The Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) total score is from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing higher levels of acceptability.

    Approximately 7 months after baseline

  • Acceptability of Active Learning Among Teachers as Assessed by the Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM)

    The Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) total score is from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing higher levels of acceptability.

    Approximately 13 months after baseline

  • Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Self-reported Implementation Logs to Assess Dose of Delivery

    Implementation logs will be completed weekly throughout the study and dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.

    Baseline

  • Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Self-reported Implementation Logs to Assess Dose of Delivery

    Implementation logs will be completed weekly throughout the study and dose of delivery is the number of minutes per week of active learning used.

    Approximately 7 months after baseline

  • Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Self-reported Implementation Logs to Assess Dose of Delivery

    Implementation logs will be completed weekly throughout the study and dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.

    Approximately 13 months after baseline

  • Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Teacher Survey of Dose of Delivery

    Dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.

    Baseline

  • Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Teacher Survey of Dose of Delivery

    Dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.

    Approximately 7 months after baseline

  • Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Teacher Survey of Dose of Delivery

    Dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.

    Approximately 13 months after baseline

  • Student Physical Activity as Indicated by Number of Minutes Per Day Spent in Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity as Assessed by the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer

    Baseline

  • Student Physical Activity as Indicated by Number of Minutes Per Day Spent in Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity as Assessed by the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer

    Approximately 7 months after baseline

  • Student Physical Activity as Indicated by Number of Minutes Per Day Spent in Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity as Assessed by the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer

    Approximately 13 months after baseline

Study Arms (2)

Implementation strategy for active learning to promote physical activity

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Implementation strategy for active learning to promote physical activity

Usual implementation support

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Usual implementation support

Interventions

The experimental arm includes using a multifaceted implementation strategy to support the use of classroom-based physical activity approaches. The strategy consists of a series of leadership trainings designed to help them support teachers, teacher trainings to build skills, and a monthly newsletter to reinforce implementation and provide access to existing resources.

Implementation strategy for active learning to promote physical activity

Usual support consists of the potential to access general resources from the district wellness department. These resources include access to funds to send staff to external trainings and general guidance for how to use active learning approaches.

Usual implementation support

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • lead teachers who teach kindergarten to fifth grade
  • children in kindergarten to fifth grade

You may not qualify if:

  • non English or Spanish speaking

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Walker TJ, Craig DW, Pfledderer CD, Lee M, Onadeko K, Saving EE, Bartholomew JB, Fernandez ME. Feasibility and acceptability of an implementation strategy to enhance use of classroom-based physical activity approaches in elementary schools: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2025 Nov 27;26(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-25333-0.

  • Walker TJ, Kohl HW 3rd, Bartholomew JB, Green C, Fernandez ME. Using Implementation Mapping to develop and test an implementation strategy for active learning to promote physical activity in children: a feasibility study using a hybrid type 2 design. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Mar 7;3(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00271-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Limitations and Caveats

The reported implementation and physical activity outcomes are unadjusted values.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Timothy J Walker, PhD
Organization
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Study Officials

  • Timothy J Walker, PhD

    The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2021

First Posted

September 17, 2021

Study Start

August 4, 2023

Primary Completion

November 22, 2024

Study Completion

November 22, 2024

Last Updated

January 14, 2026

Results First Posted

January 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations