Comparison of Plyometric and Resistance Warmup on Running Performance in Athlets

NCT05045521 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: REC/00850 Tehmina Gul
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 33
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Background: Active Warm up is one of the best and commonly used techniques in athletes that can induce special type of cardiovascular and metabolic changes that can bring the prominent change in running performance. Warm up prepares the body to withstand the high intensity exercises and improves the athletic performance and reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Objective: The objectives of study are to compare two types of warm up resistance and plyometric warm up in recreational athletes to improve running performance.

Conditions

Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

Flexibility; Plyometric warm up; resistance warm up; running performance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Incremental Test. (Time of Exhaustion)

  Initial velocity will be 7 km h/1 and increased by 1 km h/1every 3 min up to 10 km h/1. The gradient of the motorized treadmill will be set at 1% to simulate the air resistance that athletes experience on an outdoor track. During the incremental test, at 10 km h/1, the gradient will be increased by 2.5% every 2 min until exhaustion. total distance and the time of exhaustion was noted.

  day 1

Secondary Outcomes (4)

• Modified Borg Scale (Rate of Perceived Exertion)

  day 1

• Visual Analogue Fatigue Scale (VAFS)

  day 1

• Cardiopulmonary Yo- Yo Test. (Endurance Competition)

  day 2

• sargent jump test

  day 1

Study Arms (3)

plyometric warm up group

EXPERIMENTAL

set of active exercises used as warm up protocol.

Other: plyometric warm up group

resistance warm up group

EXPERIMENTAL

warm up protocol on treadmill wearing weighted jacket

Other: resistance warm up

control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

warm up protocol on treadmill without weights

Other: control warm up group

Interventions

plyometric warm up group OTHER

participants will be asked to do 10 minutes self-paced jog on motorized treadmill. During the plyometric intervention, subjects will perform the 2 \* 8 squat jumps, 2 \* 8 scissor jumps, and 2 \* 8 double leg bounds (2 sets of 8 repetitions) as a part of warm-up, and will have 60 s to recover between each set. Prior to the intervention, participants will be shown the technique to be used during jumping through use of three videos.

plyometric warm up group

resistance warm up OTHER

participants will be asked to do 10 minutes self-paced jog on motorized treadmill. After the jog participants will perform the 6\*10s strides with the 15% of the weight. Velocity of the strides will be controlled by the participants. Warmup will be followed by the 10minutes rest

resistance warm up group

control warm up group OTHER

participants will be asked to do 10 minutes self-paced jog on a motorized treadmill. After the jog participants will perform the 6\*10s strides without the weight. Velocity of the strides will be controlled by the participants. Warmup will be followed by the 10minutes rest The total amount of time spended in each of the three warm-up protocols will be recorded. Participants will be instructed to wear the same pair of running shoes during the three tests.

control

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 19 Years - 25 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Both male and female gender
• Volunteers between age 19 to 25 years
• Having total exercise load less than 5 hours per week
• BMI having between 18.5kg/m2 to 25kg/m2
• Must fulfill the 10 minutes' walk test on treadmill before starting the warmup (8).

You may not qualify if:

• Any cardiovascular and neurological diseases,
• Suffering from any musculoskeletal injuries; Any history of traumatic injuries

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Riphah International University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Aman Medical Institute

Islamabad, Capital, 44000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (11)

• 1) Ahsan M. A Comparative Study of Different Types of Warm-up Effect on Postural Stability and Isokinetic Strength. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2019;10

  BACKGROUND

• Ramirez-Campillo R, Alvarez C, Henriquez-Olguin C, Baez EB, Martinez C, Andrade DC, Izquierdo M. Effects of plyometric training on endurance and explosive strength performance in competitive middle- and long-distance runners. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jan;28(1):97-104. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1f44c.

  PMID: 23838975 BACKGROUND

• Ruben RM, Molinari MA, Bibbee CA, Childress MA, Harman MS, Reed KP, Haff GG. The acute effects of an ascending squat protocol on performance during horizontal plyometric jumps. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):358-69. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26e0.

  PMID: 20072064 BACKGROUND

• Faigenbaum AD, McFarland JE, Keiper FB, Tevlin W, Ratamess NA, Kang J, Hoffman JR. Effects of a short-term plyometric and resistance training program on fitness performance in boys age 12 to 15 years. J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Dec 1;6(4):519-25. eCollection 2007.

  PMID: 24149486 BACKGROUND

• Kotzamanidis C. Effect of plyometric training on running performance and vertical jumping in prepubertal boys. J Strength Cond Res. 2006 May;20(2):441-5. doi: 10.1519/R-16194.1.

  PMID: 16686577 BACKGROUND

• Jung AP. The impact of resistance training on distance running performance. Sports Med. 2003;33(7):539-52. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00005.

  PMID: 12762828 BACKGROUND

• Wei C, Yu L, Duncan B, Renfree A. A Plyometric Warm-Up Protocol Improves Running Economy in Recreational Endurance Athletes. Front Physiol. 2020 Mar 12;11:197. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00197. eCollection 2020.

  PMID: 32226393 BACKGROUND

• Lum D, Tan F, Pang J, Barbosa TM. Effects of intermittent sprint and plyometric training on endurance running performance. J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Sep;8(5):471-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

  PMID: 31534822 BACKGROUND

• Grieco CR, Cortes N, Greska EK, Lucci S, Onate JA. Effects of a combined resistance-plyometric training program on muscular strength, running economy, and Vo2peak in division I female soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2570-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823db1cf.

  PMID: 22105047 BACKGROUND

• Hurley BF. Effects of resistive training on lipoprotein-lipid profiles: a comparison to aerobic exercise training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989 Dec;21(6):689-93. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198912000-00012.

  PMID: 2696856 BACKGROUND

• Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Hurlbut DE, Martel GF, Lemmer JT, Sorkin JD, Metter EJ, Fleg JL, Hurley BF. Regional bone mineral density after resistive training in young and older men and women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004 Feb;14(1):16-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00328.x.

  PMID: 14723783 BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• Aisha Razzaq, MSPT-OMPT

  Riphah International University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 23, 2021
• First Posted: September 16, 2021
• Study Start: September 1, 2020
• Primary Completion: June 30, 2021
• Study Completion: August 10, 2021
• Last Updated: September 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

PA (1)