NCT05039424

Brief Summary

A randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) versus a control sham intervention (diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) without pyloric disruption) in patients with medically refractory gastroparesis.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Feb 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress97%
Feb 2022Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 19, 2021

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 23, 2022

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 26, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

August 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI)

    Change in Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) at Baseline to 12 weeks post-procedure. Possible scores range from 0 (None) to 5 (Very Severe).

    Baseline, 12 weeks post-procedure

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Gastric Emptying

    Baseline, 12 weeks post-procedure

  • 36-Item Short Form; Quality of Life Survey

    Baseline,12 weeks post-procedure

Study Arms (2)

Endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will undergo Endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP).

Procedure: Endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP)

Sham / Control Arm

SHAM COMPARATOR

Participants will undergo a diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) without pyloric disruption. Following the 12-week blinded trial period, these participants will be unblinded and offered Endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) if they remain symptomatic.

Procedure: Endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP)Procedure: Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) without pyloric disruption

Interventions

Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP), alternatively knows as gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM), accomplishes longitudinal division of the pylorus using an endoscope. This procedure involves utilizing endoscopic electrosurgical knife to make an incision in the gastric mucosa and develop a submucosal tunnel to visualize the pyloric ring. The pyloric ring is divided longitudinally, and the mucosotomy incision is sealed with endoscopic clips.

Endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP)Sham / Control Arm

While under general anesthesia, a standard gastroscope is introduced and a diagnostic upper endoscopy is performed. The operator talks through the procedure steps as if completing POP. The gastroscope is withdrawn and the patient is extubated.

Sham / Control Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female, aged 18-75
  • Diagnosis of medically refractory gastroparesis by 4 hour non-extrapolated solid phase gastric emptying study completed within 12 months of enrollment. Medical refractoriness is defined by at least 6 months of medical treatment with no significant improvement in baseline symptoms
  • Completion of all routine assessments in our multidisciplinary gastroparesis clinic, which includes evaluation by gastroenterology, behavioral health, and nutrition specialists
  • Ability to take oral medication and be willing to adhere to the post-procedure dietary and medication regimen
  • For females of reproductive potential: use of highly effective contraception for at least 1 month prior to screening and agreement to use such a method during study participation
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • Willingness and reasonable expectation that the individual will be able to travel to the study site for the intervention and each scheduled in-person assessment, as well as virtual assessments if necessary
  • Be able to speak and read the English language.

You may not qualify if:

  • Active use of narcotic pain medication
  • Presence of concomitant gastrointestinal transit disorder such as small bowel dysmotility or uncontrolled colonic dysmotility (As defined by clinical judgement or \< 3 bowel movements per week)
  • Etiology of gastroparesis is post-surgical
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • History of egg allergy
  • Prior surgical intervention of the stomach or gastric pylorus
  • Current parenteral nutrition
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy (platelet count \<50,000 and INR\>1.5) or use of anticoagulant medications (with the exception of antiplatelet therapy)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • Hasler WL. Gastroparesis: symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;36(3):619-47, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2007.07.004.

    PMID: 17950441BACKGROUND
  • Wang YR, Fisher RS, Parkman HP. Gastroparesis-related hospitalizations in the United States: trends, characteristics, and outcomes, 1995-2004. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;103(2):313-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01658.x. Epub 2007 Nov 28.

    PMID: 18047541BACKGROUND
  • Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, Divers J, Isom S, Dolan L, Imperatore G, Linder B, Marcovina S, Pettitt DJ, Pihoker C, Saydah S, Wagenknecht L; SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Incidence Trends of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes among Youths, 2002-2012. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1419-1429. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610187.

    PMID: 28402773BACKGROUND
  • Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Dubois D, Kahrilas P, Stanghellini V, Talley NJ, Tack J. Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI): development and validation of a patient reported assessment of severity of gastroparesis symptoms. Qual Life Res. 2004 May;13(4):833-44. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021689.86296.e4.

    PMID: 15129893BACKGROUND
  • Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Dubois D, Kahrilas P, Stanghellini V, Talley NJ, Tack J. Development and validation of a patient-assessed gastroparesis symptom severity measure: the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jul 1;18(1):141-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01612.x.

    PMID: 12848636BACKGROUND
  • Abell TL, Bernstein RK, Cutts T, Farrugia G, Forster J, Hasler WL, McCallum RW, Olden KW, Parkman HP, Parrish CR, Pasricha PJ, Prather CM, Soffer EE, Twillman R, Vinik AI. Treatment of gastroparesis: a multidisciplinary clinical review. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006 Apr;18(4):263-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00760.x.

    PMID: 16553582BACKGROUND
  • Yu D, Ramsey FV, Norton WF, Norton N, Schneck S, Gaetano T, Parkman HP. The Burdens, Concerns, and Quality of Life of Patients with Gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Apr;62(4):879-893. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4456-7. Epub 2017 Jan 21.

    PMID: 28110376BACKGROUND
  • Lacy BE, Crowell MD, Mathis C, Bauer D, Heinberg LJ. Gastroparesis: Quality of Life and Health Care Utilization. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;52(1):20-24. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000728.

    PMID: 27775961BACKGROUND
  • Jones MP, Maganti K. A systematic review of surgical therapy for gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2122-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07721.x.

    PMID: 14572555BACKGROUND
  • Lal N, Livemore S, Dunne D, Khan I. Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:762972. doi: 10.1155/2015/762972. Epub 2015 Jul 12.

    PMID: 26246804BACKGROUND
  • Ramkumar D, Schulze KS. The pylorus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005 Jun;17 Suppl 1:22-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00664.x.

    PMID: 15836452BACKGROUND
  • Mearin F, Camilleri M, Malagelada JR. Pyloric dysfunction in diabetics with recurrent nausea and vomiting. Gastroenterology. 1986 Jun;90(6):1919-25. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90262-3.

    PMID: 3699409BACKGROUND
  • Koch KL, Calles-Escandon J. Diabetic gastroparesis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;44(1):39-57. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2014.11.005.

    PMID: 25667022BACKGROUND
  • Toro JP, Lytle NW, Patel AD, Davis SS Jr, Christie JA, Waring JP, Sweeney JF, Lin E. Efficacy of laparoscopic pyloroplasty for the treatment of gastroparesis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;218(4):652-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.024. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

    PMID: 24529808BACKGROUND
  • Hibbard ML, Dunst CM, Swanstrom LL. Laparoscopic and endoscopic pyloroplasty for gastroparesis results in sustained symptom improvement. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Sep;15(9):1513-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1607-6. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

    PMID: 21720926BACKGROUND
  • Lebares C, Swanstrom LL. Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP): An Emerging Application of Submucosal Tunneling for the Treatment of Refractory Gastroparesis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2016 Apr;26(2):257-270. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2015.12.012.

    PMID: 27036896BACKGROUND
  • Allemang MT, Strong AT, Haskins IN, Rodriguez J, Ponsky JL, Kroh M. How I Do It: Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP). J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Nov;21(11):1963-1968. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3510-2. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

    PMID: 28752406BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez JH, Haskins IN, Strong AT, Plescia RL, Allemang MT, Butler RS, Cline MS, El-Hayek K, Ponsky JL, Kroh MD. Per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: initial results from a single institution. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5381-5388. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5619-5. Epub 2017 May 31.

    PMID: 28567693BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez J, Strong AT, Haskins IN, Landreneau JP, Allemang MT, El-Hayek K, Villamere J, Tu C, Cline MS, Kroh M, Ponsky JL. Per-oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Short Term Results From the First 100 Patients at a High Volume Center. Ann Surg. 2018 Sep;268(3):421-430. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002927.

    PMID: 30004920BACKGROUND
  • Woodhouse S, Hebbard G, Knowles SR. Psychological controversies in gastroparesis: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb 21;23(7):1298-1309. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i7.1298.

    PMID: 28275310BACKGROUND
  • Soykan I, Sivri B, Sarosiek I, Kiernan B, McCallum RW. Demography, clinical characteristics, psychological and abuse profiles, treatment, and long-term follow-up of patients with gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Nov;43(11):2398-404. doi: 10.1023/a:1026665728213.

    PMID: 9824125BACKGROUND
  • Arts J, Holvoet L, Caenepeel P, Bisschops R, Sifrim D, Verbeke K, Janssens J, Tack J. Clinical trial: a randomized-controlled crossover study of intrapyloric injection of botulinum toxin in gastroparesis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov 1;26(9):1251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03467.x.

    PMID: 17944739BACKGROUND
  • McCallum RW, Snape W, Brody F, Wo J, Parkman HP, Nowak T. Gastric electrical stimulation with Enterra therapy improves symptoms from diabetic gastroparesis in a prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov;8(11):947-54; quiz e116. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

    PMID: 20538073BACKGROUND
  • McCallum RW, Sarosiek I, Parkman HP, Snape W, Brody F, Wo J, Nowak T. Gastric electrical stimulation with Enterra therapy improves symptoms of idiopathic gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Oct;25(10):815-e636. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12185. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

    PMID: 23895180BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalez JM, Benezech A, Vitton V, Barthet M. G-POEM with antro-pyloromyotomy for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: mid-term follow-up and factors predicting outcome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug;46(3):364-370. doi: 10.1111/apt.14132. Epub 2017 May 15.

    PMID: 28504312BACKGROUND
  • Mancini SA, Angelo JL, Peckler Z, Philp FH, Farah KF. Pyloroplasty for Refractory Gastroparesis. Am Surg. 2015 Jul;81(7):738-46.

    PMID: 26140897BACKGROUND
  • Khashab MA, Ngamruengphong S, Carr-Locke D, Bapaye A, Benias PC, Serouya S, Dorwat S, Chaves DM, Artifon E, de Moura EG, Kumbhari V, Chavez YH, Bukhari M, Hajiyeva G, Ismail A, Chen YI, Chung H. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: results from the first multicenter study on endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.048. Epub 2016 Jun 25.

    PMID: 27354102BACKGROUND
  • Gersin KS, Rothstein RI, Rosenthal RJ, Stefanidis D, Deal SE, Kuwada TS, Laycock W, Adrales G, Vassiliou M, Szomstein S, Heller S, Joyce AM, Heiss F, Nepomnayshy D. Open-label, sham-controlled trial of an endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass liner for preoperative weight loss in bariatric surgery candidates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 May;71(6):976-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.051. Epub 2010 Mar 20.

    PMID: 20304396BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastroparesis

Interventions

PyloromyotomyEndoscopy, Digestive System

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stomach DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesParalysisNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeGastrectomyMyotomyDiagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Matthew Allemang, MD

    The Cleveland Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: A comparative effectiveness, single center (with two surgical units), randomized (1:1) study of POP vs. sham endoscopic surveillance in patients with medically refractory gastroparesis. This study will also include a crossover approach, offering POP to patients randomized to the sham arm, if they remain symptomatic at 12 weeks post randomization.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2021

First Posted

September 9, 2021

Study Start

February 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 26, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations