NCT05031364

Brief Summary

This study is a 4-year randomized, controlled trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to usual clinical care for children (aged 6-14 years) with autism and emotional dysregulation (e.g., irritability, anxiety). We will randomly assign 50 mental health clinicians, each treating 2 youth (N = 100 youth total), to CBT program for emotional dysregulation and core autism symptoms with weekly live consultation with an expert or to usual clinical care augmented by self-instruction in CBT, in a 1:1 allocation. The CBT manual is well-supported in our efficacy research, has been replicated in other centers, is free/open-access (meya.ucla.edu), and has user-friendly digital and traditional print materials for mental health clinicians (e.g., psychologists, counselors) to use in preparing for and conducting therapy sessions. The primary outcome measure will be assessed weekly. Additional assessments will occur at Screening, Mid-treatment, Post- treatment and 3-month Follow-up.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Jul 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress98%
Jul 2021Jun 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2021

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 1, 2021

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

February 9, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

July 28, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Brief Problem Monitor (BPM)

    The BPM (Achenbach et al., 2011) is an abbreviated version of the widely used Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2001). The sum of the parent-report BPM Internalizing and Externalizing subscales will be utilized as the primary outcome measure in this study to index improvement across core aspects of children's mental health (i.e., anxiety, irritability, depressed mood, defiance). The BPM is comprised of 19 items. Each item is rated 0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true, or 2 = very true. Higher scores reflect more problems. Research suggests the BPM has good reliability and validity and is sensitive to change in effectiveness studies of youth psychotherapy (Piper et al., 2014; Weisz et al., 2012). The BPM can be administered remotely via the internet.

    Baseline (week 0), Sessions 1 to 16 (weekly, approximately weeks 1 to 16), and Follow-up (approx. week 29)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Youth Top Problems (YTP) Rating Scale

    Baseline (week 0), Sessions 1 to 16 (weekly, approximately weeks 1 to 16), and Follow-up (approx. week 29)

  • Change in Social Responsiveness Scale II (SRS-II)

    Baseline (week 0), Session 8 (approximately week 8), Immediate Post-Treatment [approx. week 16], and Follow-up (approx. week 29)

  • Consumer Satisfaction Parent Questionnaire

    Immediate Post-Treatment [approximately week 16]

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Therapy Procedures Checklist (TPC)

    Immediate Post-Treatment [approximately week 16]

  • The Modular EBPs for Youth with Autism Fidelity Scale (MEYA-FS; McLeod et al., 2022)

    Sessions 1 [approximately week 1], 5 [approx. week 5], 9 [approx. week 9], and 13 [approx. week 13]

  • Change in BIACA Therapist Quiz

    Baseline [week 0] and Immediate Post-Treatment [approximately week 16]

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Consultation-Based Training on BIACA

EXPERIMENTAL

Community mental health clinicians will be given online one-on-one training and consultation in the BIACA (Behavioral Interventions for Anxiety in Children with Autism; e.g., Wood et al., 2020) CBT program. Clinicians will be provided with weekly 30-minute video-conference-based consultation sessions with an expert in BIACA. These consultation sessions are manual-driven and utilize a Practice-Based Coaching format, in which a trained consultant meets weekly with clinicians to provide practice-based feedback (cf. McLeod et al., 2018). Consultation meetings include agenda setting, case material review, planning for the next treatment session, and a meeting summary. Relevant online training materials (e.g., demonstration videos of CBT sessions; corresponding written session materials) developed in the context of a NIMH R34 grant available on meya.ucla.edu (1R34MH110591) will also be provided to clinicians for each upcoming therapy session.

Behavioral: Behavioral Interventions for Anxiety in Children with Autism (BIACA)

Usual Care Augmented by Self-Instruction Resources for CBT for Autism

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Community mental health clinicians in this arm will provide any therapy, counseling, and/or behavioral treatment procedures they deem appropriate for each participating child. Clinicians randomized to this arm will be given immediate access to CBT-for-autism self-instruction materials that are already freely available to any clinician at meya.ucla.edu (see Consultation-Based Training on BIACA arm, above), to supplement their usual clinical care, if they so choose, until they complete their Usual Care/Self-Instruction participation and are offered direct training and weekly consultation in BIACA.

Behavioral: Treatment-as-Usual Supplemented by Internet-Based Self-Instruction (MEYA)

Interventions

In the BIACA CBT program (e.g., Wood et al., 2020), clinicians work with families for 16 weekly sessions that include both the child and parent(s). In BIACA, anxiety, rigidity and inflexible routines, and irritability are all addressed using in vivo exposure therapy strategies during sessions as well as parent (and teacher) training to promote regulation across settings. ASD-related clinical needs that can impact mental health and emotion regulation such as friendship skills and social entry skills (e.g., joining games at school) are addressed with modeling, self-management, and parent- (or teacher-) implemented social coaching in daily settings. For youth with limited communication, therapy is adapted through the use of play-based representations of challenging situations and an emphasis on more action-oriented exposure therapy.

Consultation-Based Training on BIACA

Participating clinicians are expected to have varied training in numerous psychological therapy procedures (e.g., insight-oriented procedures, cognitive interventions, family therapy, etc.), any or all of which they may choose to implement with a participating child. These practices will be characterized through the Therapy Procedures Checklist (Weersing et al., 2002). Additionally, participating clinicians will be provided with information about self-instruction resources on CBT for children with autism, namely, the Modular Evidence-Based Practices for Youth with Autism (MEYA) website developed by our research group. MEYA is freely accessible to clinicians worldwide at meya.ucla.edu. MEYA incorporates treatment elements of both BIACA (Wood et al., 2020) and SEBASTIEN (Wood et al., 2021), which was designed to address additional autism-related clinical needs (e.g., reciprocal conversation). Clinicians in this arm will provide up to 16 therapy sessions.

Usual Care Augmented by Self-Instruction Resources for CBT for Autism

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 14 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Youth will have a pre-existing clinical diagnosis of ASD made by an appropriate licensed professional (e.g., clinical psychologist, developmental pediatrician) which will be documented in a report or medical note provided by the family, or confirmed telephonically by the diagnosing professional.
  • The parent-reported Social Responsive Scale-2 (SRS-2; Constantino \& Gruber, 2012) Total T-Score will be \> 60 (cut-score maximizing ROC curve parameters for screening for ASD; area under the curve = 98.8%; Schanding et al., 2011).
  • Youth will meet criteria for clinically significant emotion dysregulation symptoms as defined by a minimum T-score of 60 on the Externalizing or Internalizing subscales of the parent-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) and at least 15 T-score points over 50 between these two BPM subscales (e.g., Internalizing=60 + Externalizing=55).
  • The youth has a Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3 Communication Composite Standard Score \> 60 and Expressive Communication subscale v-score \> 8 (in both cases \> 1st %ile).

You may not qualify if:

  • \. For participants presenting with severe comorbid symptomology (e.g., psychotic symptoms), the comorbid conditions cannot be sufficiently severe to warrant immediate treatment or require ongoing medication titration.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Westside Regional Center

Culver City, California, 90024, United States

RECRUITING

California Autism Professional Training and Information Network (CAPTAIN)

Sacramento, California, 95817, United States

RECRUITING

Naval Medical Center San Diego

San Diego, California, 92115, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Wood JJ, Kendall PC, Wood KS, Kerns CM, Seltzer M, Small BJ, Lewin AB, Storch EA. Cognitive Behavioral Treatments for Anxiety in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 May 1;77(5):474-483. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4160.

    PMID: 31755906BACKGROUND
  • Wood JJ, Ehrenreich-May J, Alessandri M, Fujii C, Renno P, Laugeson E, Piacentini JC, De Nadai AS, Arnold E, Lewin AB, Murphy TK, Storch EA. Cognitive behavioral therapy for early adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and clinical anxiety: a randomized, controlled trial. Behav Ther. 2015 Jan;46(1):7-19. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

    PMID: 25526831BACKGROUND
  • Wood JJ, McLeod BD, Klebanoff S, Brookman-Frazee L. Toward the implementation of evidence-based interventions for youth with autism spectrum disorders in schools and community agencies. Behav Ther. 2015 Jan;46(1):83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

    PMID: 25526837BACKGROUND
  • Lecavalier L, Wood JJ, Halladay AK, Jones NE, Aman MG, Cook EH, Handen BL, King BH, Pearson DA, Hallett V, Sullivan KA, Grondhuis S, Bishop SL, Horrigan JP, Dawson G, Scahill L. Measuring anxiety as a treatment endpoint in youth with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 May;44(5):1128-43. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1974-9.

    PMID: 24158679BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Autistic Disorder

Interventions

Behavior Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Autism Spectrum DisorderChild Development Disorders, PervasiveNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Wood

    University of California

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Treatment condition and timepoint will be masked for the outcomes assessors (independent evaluators \[IEs\]), who will administer the interview-based measures.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2021

First Posted

September 1, 2021

Study Start

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

To comply with the Policy, we propose to make de-identified data, codebooks, and documentation available under the auspices of the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR) (for data) and the PI's UCLA website (for codebooks, documentation, etc.). The study protocol is posted on clinicaltrials.gov.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Datasets associated with manuscripts that are published during or following the grant period will be available once each manuscript is made available by the publisher. The final data set will be made available from Dr. Wood within 3 years after the end of all data collection activities. All datasets will be stored and made available for a minimum of 10 years or longer, depending on the extant NDAR policies.
Access Criteria
NDAR sets a universal policy for accessing its datasets. Other information will be freely available on the PI's website.

Locations