Ventilation and Gastric Insufflation During Three Levels of Inspiratory Pressure During Mask Ventilation
Evaluation of Adequacy of Ventilation and Gastric Insufflation During Three Levels of Inspiratory Pressure for Pressure-controlled Mask Ventilation During Induction of Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
111
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents is one of the leading causes of general anesthesia-related mortality. Gastric insufflation during positive pressure mask ventilation increases the gastric volume, and consequently the risk of regurgitation. Thus, positive pressure mask ventilation should be avoided during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia when full-stomach is suspected (e.g. inadequate fasting hours, gastrointestinal obstruction, delayed gastric emptying, and lower esophageal disease) Although avoidance of positive pressure mask ventilation during induction would potentially minimize the risk of aspiration, this would lead to rapid hypoxia . Hence, finding a proper regimen for mask ventilation would avoid hypoxia which might be serious in high-risk patients. Pressure-controlled face mask ventilation previously proved to be the least regimen to cause gastric insufflation in comparison to manual, and volume-controlled mask ventilation during induction of anesthesia. Later, a pressure of 15 cmH2O during face mask ventilation had been reported optimum to achieve the balance between adequate ventilation and reduced gastric insufflation in non-paralyzed patients. This finding was not yet replicated in paralyzed patients who represent the majority of population who receive mask ventilation during induction of anesthesia. We hypothesize that in paralyzed patient, the optimum pressure during face mask ventilation might be lower than the pressure which was previously reported in non-paralyzed patients. However, no studies to the best of our knowledge had confirmed this hypothesis. Gastric insufflation was previously evaluated using auscultation with stethoscope, microphone placed in the epigastric area, or esophageal manometry. Recently, gastric antrum ultrasound was used successfully to gastric insufflation in real time by measuring the cross sectional area of gastric antrum before and after face mask ventilation. This newly developed method is more sensitive than the auscultatory method and less invasive than esophageal manometry method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedSeptember 13, 2021
September 1, 2021
3 months
August 19, 2021
September 10, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
incidence of gastric insufflation by ultrasonography
gastric antrum cross sectional area increased by \> 30% after endotracheal intubation in relation to the baseline
within 1 minute after endotracheal intubation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Gastric antrum cross sectional area
1 minute before mask ventilation and within 1 minute after endotracheal intubation
tidal volume
at 30, 60, 90,120, 150, and 180 seconds after onset of mask ventilation
endtidal CO2
at 30, 60, 90,120, 150, and 180 seconds after onset of mask ventilation
peripheral O2 saturation
at 30, 60, 90,120, 150, and 180 seconds after onset of mask ventilation
incidence of gastric insufflation by auscultation
1 minute after onset of mask ventilation
Study Arms (3)
pressure 10
ACTIVE COMPARATORmask ventilation with peak inspiratory pressure of 10 cmH2O
pressure 15
ACTIVE COMPARATORmask ventilation with peak inspiratory pressure of 15 cmH2O
pressure 20
ACTIVE COMPARATORmask ventilation with peak inspiratory pressure of 20 cmH2O
Interventions
pressure controlled mask ventilation with peak inspiratory pressure of 10 cmH2O
pressure controlled mask ventilation with peak inspiratory pressure of 15 cmH2O
pressure controlled mask ventilation with peak inspiratory pressure of 20 cmH2O
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult patients (above 18 years)
- American society of anesthesiologist I-II
- scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- increased risk of difficult mask ventilation
- patients at risk of aspiration
- Patients with craniofacial anomalies
- BMI \>35 kg/m2
- pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kasr Alaini Hospital
Cairo, 11562, Egypt
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2021
First Posted
August 25, 2021
Study Start
September 9, 2021
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09